• Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    25 days ago

    There is a distinct type of person, very good at one thing, that is unable to understand that doesn’t translate to the rest of their life. Easiest to describe them as a high int, low wis character.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Still incredible that people bought into “half the features twice the price” Apple products so hard that it corrupted the entire industry

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          I will give him credit he turned computers and phones into fashion accessories. He is closer to Coco Chanel than any tech visionary. If you think about it his methods were closer to QAnon or flat earth people. You can sell some people anything if you can convince them they are better than other people if they follow you. I am still salty about him overshadowed Dennis Richie’s passing who was a real tech visionary.

          • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Steve Jobs, Edison, Elon are all similar to me as they used smart people and took most of the credit. Westinghouse at least for the time treated his employees above average.

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              Considering how much control Apple tries to exert over how you use your devices that does seem pretty close to the truth.

              • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                Apple’s shitty software isn’t the problem. Literally everything online is collected. Why wouldn’t they? How much do you think this comment costs outside the fediverse? And fuck Apple, too you’re right

        • bisby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to realize that convenience and simplicity are sometimes a feature. Just Works™ technology has a lot of value (assuming the thing does in fact just work).

          I don’t have any Apple products, but there are plenty of other categories in my life where I’ve paid more for a worse product just because I didn’t have to think at all about the one I got.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Just Works™ technology has a lot of value (assuming the thing does in fact just work).

            And that assumption is unfounded in Apple’s case. My parents have constant issues with their iPhones that you would never get on Android. But my mom is convinced that it’s easier to use than Android despite never having tried Android

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              I’d be interested to hear what those problems are. Not saying you’re wrong by any means, but the legacy of the iPhone has been, from the very beginning, a simple, non customizable, piss easy to use, smart phone for dumb people that basically can’t be broken (at least on a software level) because it won’t let you play with any of the fiddly bits. It does exactly what it does and if you don’t like that, shoulda bought an Android instead, because this iPhone isn’t about to let you change it.

              That’s not to say that they can’t have bugs or issues, because they certainly can, but the ability of the phone owner to brick themselves is like a fraction of a fraction of a percent of what you’d see with Androids in my experience. Android will let you do what you want up to and including breaking your boot loader if you mess around with developer settings, Apple doesn’t even give you dev settings last I knew.

              I’m an Android fan myself but I do see that Apple has a use case, and that use case is giving non technically minded people a device that “just works” mostly without having to fiddle with it.

              • rooroo@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 days ago

                I’ve switched to iOS exclusively about 10 years ago cause I got tired of android being full of it. I just wanted a phone that works without me tweaking every little thing. I don’t regret the choice one bit, other than giving money to the other tech giant.

                This is not me hating android either; I guess I was unlucky with the phones I had.

                That said, being a dev myself, my phone shouldn’t be a side project I maintain, but something I can use with ease. Apple products fit that description for me and just as that won’t be a universal sentiment (which it never should be) that’s nothing to be scoffed at.

          • Snowclone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            I feel this way about cars. I still don’t even like automatic doors. Electrical systems in any car is a nightmare. Add 10k little doodads and features all drawing electrical power make so complicated a mess you’ll never sort it out and if you do you’ll probably realize that the automotive engineer set it up that way because there isn’t a better solution that’s obvious to anyone who knows how electrical systems are designed and work let alone a backyard mechanic.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I used to work as a court clerk and judges are like this. You cannot tell them anything because if they get it into their heads that they know better than you then they will completely ignore reality in favor of their own, largely arbitrary, fictional universe.

      The best incentive ever not to commit a crime is to find out how utterly dysfunctional the legal system is.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        The Alito brain is the end stage of this mentality.

        “‘Any’ limitation?? Have you considered fish and birds aren’t mammals? The principal wouldn’t be happy! Checkmate EPA, now you can’t enforce water quality standards.” -SCOTUS last week.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        People say he was good at marketing but really he was only okay at marketing. He got fined because everyone hated him. Then they completely mismanaged the company and had no choice but to bring him back, which of course just reinforced his ego.

        The truth was they could have got any moderately competent CEO and they would have brought Apple back from the brink, just as much as Steve Jobs did. Look at Tim Cook, he’s not doing an obviously worse job than Jobs did, but because he doesn’t have the formers aura, people rightfully call him out every time he does something stupid.

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        I think he had a good grasp on consumer desires. Which seems to be really tough for the majority of people, perhaps business people in particular.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Doctors failed to communicate the situation in a way he would grasp that his choices were death or chemo. Maybe a, "that’s your choice? OK, before you go, how world you like us to handle your corpse? So you want a full autopsy to confirm the cancer diagnosis, or would you prefer we didn’t? Is there a particular burial home you have plans with? "

      But in all likelihood there’s nothing anyone could have said to him to make him see reason.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        But in all likelihood there’s nothing anyone could have said to him to make him see reason.

        “The CEO after you will mess up the design of apple products”

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Also everyone will stop using iPods because they realized the truth that was always there which is that having a separate device for listening to music, when you already have a portable computer in your pocket is stupid.

          • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            I’m legitimately wondering if you’re young enough to not know that the iPod came WAY before the first iPhone, which was the first widely adopted smart phone.

            • Mîm@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              You could play your music from your phone quite a good bit before the first iPhone. But even then, IIRC the iPod came before that was common.
              Never understood what it did different to a regular mp3 player though.

              • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                Yeah, that is true, but it’s also true like the other guy said, it was absolutely not worth it and sounded terrible.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        There is a real systemic problem with healthcare. I dunno if it would have applied to Jobs, but with normal patients, the quick get-in get-out assembly line–like approach to healthcare means patients don’t feel well taken care of, which is a stark contrast to pseudoscientific woo-woo like chiropracty, reiki, naturopathy, and other “alternative medicine”, where the practitioners take their time and make the patients feel listened to. Is it any wonder that some people, especially those of minorities that have historically tended to be treated even worse by actual medical professionals (women’s “hysteria”, black people “feel pain less”, fat people “just need to lose weight”, etc ), are becoming more likely to embrace the thing that makes them feel good, rather than the thing that actually works?

        IMO alternative medicine practitioners who discourage their customers from going to real doctors should be imprisoned. But the big problem is a lack of funding to real doctors to allow them to spend more time providing more personal care to patients.

        • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          The guy had practically unlimited money. He could have paid a world class doctor to clean his bathroom every week while giving health advice and playing the guitar at the same time.

          I know people who are well off, have serious health issues and spend a lot of effort to go to doctors who are experts in their fields. I’d say part of the problem is that most doctors are really bad with humans.

  • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    The behind the bastards episode will teach you a lot about this piece of shit. Wozniak is the genius, this is just another predatory businessman. Good riddance.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Yknow, while I 90% agree with you there seems to be some element between the technical genius (Wozniak) and the idiot businessman that is Tim Apple.

      Jobs may have been a piece of shit but there’s something to be said for the uncompromising non-technical focus on UX that allowed Jobs to make the iPhone a success.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Sure Wozniak invented the Apple I and II. But if he never met Jobs his inventions would have stayed a hobby and Apple would have never existed. Woz also didn’t push for an OS with a GUI (which was revolutionary back then) that was Jobs’ idea. Not to mention that Woz had nothing to do with Apple’s comeback. He has been an honorary employee since Jobs was fired. Woz is a genius but people give him way too much credit just like they do with Jobs.

      • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        “Invent” is the wrong term, it’s “design”.

        a new idea is an invention, the implementation is a design.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Jobs had no ideas. GUI, like everything else, was stolen from someone else. Apple and Microsoft both got big by stealing ideas.

        • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Is it really stealing if you pay for it?

          Xerox PARC had lots of great ideas, and then just never really commercialized any of them.

    • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      Italiano
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Still remeber an interview to Buffet in his time when he used to hang with Bill Gates.

      It surprised me he considered Gates a talented investor, like he shouldn’t supposed to be. I mean Warren, Bill is an investor as much as you are. Even Buffet was confused from the “tech nerd” aura of Bill.

      Same with Jobs, Musk and so on. They’re just good investors (and usually despicable persons).

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Wow, they made 4 episodes about him, each over an hour long.

      Haven’t listened to Behind The Bastards but will give this one a listen.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Careful, it’s addicting, I’ve probably listened to over 100 hours of Robert Evans talking about the scum of the Earth now.

        • Michal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Not to worry, I’m binging a few addicting podcasts already and I need something to fall back to once they run out. Recently discovered “Lateral” by Tom Scott (the youtuber).

  • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I mean, fucking up is a common thing people do and is an integral part of the human condition. What should be emphasized about Jobs case is that he fucked up his own liver, learned the cause and treatments, used his wealth to cut in the waiting line to get a liver transplant, and then fucked his second liver just the same way. This is the definition of terminally stupid, and no UX focus will ever change that.

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Forgot about that. I too am deeply irresponsible with my liver, but I would never ask for a second one. That’s an entire human organ!

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Iirc, what we normally call “sugar” is sucrose, made up of glucose and fructose. Glucose is used all over the place and too much is definitely bad (ask diabetics), while fructose is processed in your liver. Like a poison.

          Just trying to remember that from stuff I’ve seen from Robert Lustig MD. There’s a very old “sugar: the bitter truth” lecture of his on YouTube, plus lots of media since then.

          • easily3667@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Glucose is only bad in the same way oxygen is bad. I think you need to rewatch your lecture.

            Diabetics don’t have a problem with too much glucose they have an issue with too little insulin or insulin resistance

                • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Not the commenter but as a type 1 diabetic yeah you’re right, but when most say diabetes they mean type 2, which is the kind where you eat unhealthy and don’t exercise where type 1 is when your immune system just doesn’t like your pancreas

                  I was going somewhere with this but completely lost my train of thought

              • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 days ago

                Kind of? Getting fat and eating too much regularly are great ways to get diabetes, and sugar is a great way to get fat.

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  Sugar is also acidic. Not enough to kill you, but that’s why ketoacidosis kills people. It also increases blood viscosity, making it pump harder and causing hypertension. Plus, it causes chronic inflammation, which calcifies triglycerides in your blood to form clots.

                  Sugar has tons of negative effects.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I remember reading a story a while back about the documentary they were making on him. He had his special diet of juices and supplements and whatnot, which he claimed helped him while his liver was failing. The actor who portrayed him started following the same diet to better get in character. Only then he collapsed on set with liver problems. They did a full medical work up and basically told him whatever you’re doing stop doing it because it’s killing you. He went back to his normal diet and he was fine. Raising the serious question, did Steve Jobs outsmart himself to death? If he had given up all the diets and supplements and whatnot might he have lived?

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        If he had pursued modern medical treatments rather than a sugar filled diet he might have lived. He would have to have stepped down though and he did not want to do that.

        He would also have to admit he was completely wrong about his diet and that he absolutely did not want to do as it was tied to some dumbass “philosophy” he followed.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        If “outsmart” is ignore people who know things because you believe you know everything…yes

        A better description would be that he treated his body the way he treated his employees. Or he let himself believe his own reality distortion field. “Outsmart” is not the word I’d choose for a narcissistic asshole who thinks he knows better but in fact does not.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        It’s kind of an effort post. It’s also just a “imagine if this other concept took off, because it didn’t happen I can imagine an alternative history where it did take off” except the post doesn’t exactly imagine the outcome, just seems to say "like we should have done this thing in the 60s and we didn’t and look how bad capitalism is at making good things happen which is true but not an argument actually for anything.

        Quora was at one point fine, it’s just like all such sites.

      • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Quora became good in its first years until the other co-founder was fired around 2012 (Coincidence? Who were the visionaries?). Quora stagnated until 2018 when the remaining (visionless) co-founder started enshittifying it.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’d be far more interested in learning more about the other folks on the Macintosh team. They’re an amazing group of people who put a lot of care into something they believed in, Steve Jobs notwithstanding. What they did with what they had was amazing, and the fact that they got lost in Jobs’ spotlight is tragic.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I was reading an interesting article the other day about how after World War II people were obviously opposed to populism, and by the '80s and certainly the '90s people that were born after the war had lost the awareness of the danger that hero worship creates.

    At the same time, many organizations including government organizations had failed to update themselves over the years, so people romanticized the idea of someone walking in and magically making the correct snap judgments that would remedy the situation. This was so pervasive in the business world I think in part because it allowed corporate executives to justify f****** over ordinary employees. If the company makes or breaks because of one person at the top, who cares if you’re paying people minimum wage and they can’t even afford to pay for dental care or a car.

    What amazed me is how long that vision of Steve Jobs stuck around. Even in recent years people have been praising him, but if you think of the value in his company, it’s mostly a load of s***. Those phones and computers are incredibly overpriced, and they have so many bad aspects, especially lock-in, which most people intuitively understand these days. And still we have Apple addicts.

    • lumpybag@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Your take feels incredibly aggressive. Most people do not want to tinker, they just want their tech to work… Regarding Steve Jobs, are you saying he did not steer Apple to a level of success and prosperity that 99% other companies dream of?

      Your opinion of what is overpriced is just your opinion. Apples sales numbers says otherwise, they do not have a monopoly in any market they compete in.

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Regarding Steve Jobs, are you saying he did not steer Apple to a level of success and prosperity that 99% other companies dream of?

        Congratulations, you have defended ultra capitalism and the destruction of workers and competition for the personal profit of the shareholders.

        • lumpybag@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Why is everyone so aggressive about history and facts? Please take your blind rage back to Reddit. This thread is about Steve Jobs, acting like he did not lead Apple to numerous successes is a bold face lie. You might not agree with his methods but that doesn’t mean he accomplished nothing.

          Your example proves my point, the alternative, Google, is just as if not more evil than Apple… just because they allow third party stores and less lock-in does not mean their product is better. Each person can choose the product that suits their needs.

            • lumpybag@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Of course he did bad things, he’s human, every great person has said, you learn and grow from your failures.

              Apple’s iOS was far more polished than Android in the beginning. Hell, Apple’s iTunes Store paired with its iPods revolutionized the cell phone with the iPhone.

              The lock-in has both pros and cons. Do i think it’s hard to move off of Apple once you’re in it? No not really, again they don’t own a monopoly in anything. They just provide a very polished experience in what they do aka “it just works.”

              The only thing you can’t really transfer is one-time Apple App Store purchases.

              Is it easy to switch from Gmail? Yes, creating a new email is easy, do you get the same benefits leaving the market leader? Most likely not…

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’m not an Apple fan, I never liked the way he dictated form and function and told everyone to fuck off about their feelings. Now that said, his leadership did bring some things to market that would not have grown organically, for better or for worse.

      The competition had to contend with good phone battery life, unibody laptops with high DPI screens, and large touchpads with physical feedback. Left to their own devices, these companies would have just kept regurgitating/iterating the same cheap designs they had made for decades.

      He wasn’t magic; if he had any superpower, it was attracting and retaining talent.

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Pretty sure Apple just packaged shit other companies made with extraordinary marketing. Like the ipod circle everybody went nuts for they settled a lawsuit with creative because of patent infringement. I actually had a creative zen and loved it because it didn’t have Apple software trying to control my music library.

      • aceshigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Jobs created toxic work environments. That’s nothing to envy. Nothing to replicate. But we’re in a capitalist society so fuck your feelings.

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Jobs created toxic work environments.

          …and so did Linus Torvalds* — he’s certainly not the embodiment of capitalism. But I absolutely have a huge amount of respect for Torvalds, even if I don’t approve of his way of his interpersonal/professional style.

          (I used to run Arch btw [but I run Debian now].)

          *He’s supposedly taken steps in the right direction here and has made improvements.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          That’s nothing to envy.

          I don’t think that word, or anything like it appeared in my statement.

  • LucidLyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Jobs paved the way for Musk. I hate that he’s so often cited as a genius to look up to in the tech world

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Not musk, the entire silicon valley fake it and hope you make it mindset. Jobs opened the door for Holmes. Jobs opened the door for Uber to completely make up a business plan. Jobs opened the door to Elon buying “founder” status. His genius contribution is in making the tech industry the batch of lying scum it is today.

      • LucidLyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Which is one of the reasons I’m giving up on working in tech despite having a PhD from my home country in Telecommunications. I have skills and could learn the ones I lack but I just don’t have the mindset and attitude and don’t feel like developing them. I’d rather code my own projects in my own way while remaining underemployed.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Maybe, but then you also have people like my brother who basically worship Jobs, and say shit like “Wozniak is expendable.”

        I told him people like Wozniak are the real geniuses who actually make shit work, and he told me straight faced that without people like Jobs people like Wozniak will probably just have a desk job.

        • WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          People that worship psuedo intellectuals like Jobs are just coping with that fact that they’re less intelligent. Sales dudes love having sales rule over engineering. I’d go as far to say it’s difficult to be a decent human being and in sales at the same time.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          You need a desk to place the components on to build the computer and then to place the computer on, to do the programming.

          I’d say, even with Jobs, Wozniak had a desk job.


          Of course, unless you use a projector or floor-stands for the monitors and keep the keyboard+mouse on your lap, in which case, you can get away from the desk.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I find it really amusing to know Bill Gates ones made fun of him:

        “Steve’s achievements are all the more impressive when you know that he couldn’t look at a piece of code and know what it was.”

        However he also said:

        “Clearly, he had so many skills that I didn’t, but we were both a little bit pied pipers in terms of getting people to work ridiculous hours.”

        Which really should tell you everything you need to know given who made the money and how many people were made to work “ridiculous hours”.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The behind the bastards episodes on Jobs was really eye-opening to just how awful of a leader he was

  • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    Italiano
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Dude sent his kids to a Waldorf school.

    I mean, his kids doesn’t actually learn how to write, their ass is covered, but I wonder how many followed the example of this idiot.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Only fanboys. The same kind that worship Musk or any other fellated-by-the-press CEO as some kind of hero. They softball any criticisms and turn them into positives - “He murdered a bunch of kids, but the creativity he got from the blood splatter and time spent in court-ordered community service got us this addictive device we’re all fawning over…let’s justify the ridiculous price and wait in line for one!” Something about objectively shitty people heading up organizations seems to attract sycophants and bootlickers.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Only fanboys.

      Oh I wish. It’s more like 2/3 of American society, and I’m sure plenty of others around the world. But if you wanted to cast a wide net and call them fanboys of the rich, I guess that’s fair.

      If you are worth billions, and even moreso if you are a business leader and therefore “earned” those billions, then “worship” is the right word. They are not just good people, but the greatest among us who should be put in charge of everything. (Enter our new emperor)

  • cdkg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Steve jobs ain’t a genius. He was just a good salesman.

    • Juice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The sales people almost always end up doing well in companies. And then when they get high up in the company they only value others ability to make sales and work for bonuses. As time goes on a company’s e-suite gets more and more saturated with charismatic dummies who will do anything for a buck, leaving less room for good administrators and engineers.

      • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Small thing, but I’ve never heard it called an e-suite, only c-suite. I assume the “e” stands for executive vs the “c” being chief.