MAGA fans are rejoicing on social media in favor of President Donald Trump’s plan to sign an executive order requiring commercial truck drivers to speak English.

Breitbart News reported that Trump would sign the order Monday evening because “President Trump believes that English is a non-negotiable safety requirement for professional drivers.” Last month, Trump designated English as “the official language of the United States.”

“This is such a big deal! So grateful for this, the roads will be much safer. Like many, I have seen many accidents or near accidents from unqualified drivers,” posted @coffeegirlvegas.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good news! With the tarriffs throwing cold water on freight all across the US, we won’t need as many truck drivers!

      …I really wish I was joking, but the fiance is OTR and freight has already slowed for him. Here’s an article from February that talks about how it was already slower than expected.

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ouch. Things are about to get real harsh before they get worse. I hope you are prepared.

        It’s been speculated that Trump is doing this to prepare for the drop in cargo transport in the next few days. Me, I have doubts because nothing that Trump has said or done so far makes me believe that he or his sycophants are intellectually capable of that kind of rational planning. What do you think?

        • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          He has no goddamned clue what he’s doing. Whoever is speculating that is welcome to point to even one time where Trump prepared to keep people from economic harm in such a fashion, but I’ve only ever seen him walk things back, not actually insulate someone from harm.

          • toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Word history!

            1784, a colloquial American English alteration of darnation (itself a minced oath in place of damnation), influenced by tarnal (1790), a mild profanity, clipped from phrase by the Eternal (God), for which see eternal.

            • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Neat … never did think about where the word ‘tarnation’ came from … heard it many times and just thought it was a made up nonsense word … never thought it had an actual history like that. Thanks!

              • toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                okay, you’ve got to check out RobWords and Words Unraveled. i’m not usually one to plug youtube channels, but i think you’d really like them. i suggest you check out words unraveled first - just because it’s a lot of fun and jess (his co-host) adds a lot and makes him blush.

                • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You are a monster … I spend hours watching furniture and small engine restoration videos … documentaries and history … now you’ve given me a new branch of content to watch.

                  I can both simultaneously thank you and curse for this information. Regardless, I’m happy to have met you.

  • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Literally no trumpees anywhere can tell you their top three works of literature.

    This is fact.

      • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s informational text, not literature.

        My severely undereducated state rep trumpee Angela Rigas replied to me that her top three works of literature are the bible, constitution, and declaration of independence. She had no response when I told her those aren’t literature.

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was being sarcastic, because I know you’d get a lot of extremely similar answers.

          Besides… the Bible is fiction

          • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fiction would count as literature. I’d say it goes in the self-help section next to the Tony Robbins cassette tape series.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is just an excuse for ICE to pull people over. And since they’re a part of the executive branch, they care less about due process and laws.

  • DBT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “This is such a big deal! So grateful for this, the roads will be much safer. Like many, I have seen many accidents or near accidents from unqualified drivers,” posted @coffeegirlvegas.

    Oh yea? You and many others have witnessed many accidents that were due to a truck driver’s inability to speak English?

    You dumb bitch.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Meanwhile how many accidents are caused by dumb bitches on their phones?

    • socphoenix@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s already part of the federal commercial driver regulations too… so no. No they have not. The most they’ve seen is someone with a heavy accent and maybe broken English.

      • DBT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m willing to bet the most they’ve seen is some accidents involving trucks, with no knowledge of what happened or who was driving.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s already part of the federal commercial driver regulations too

        If it is already part of the rules, what makes this EO a bad thing? Sounds like it’s just enforcing a status-quo that nobody had an issue with.

        “Interpreters are prohibited during the administration of skills tests. Applicants must be able to understand and respond to verbal commands and instructions in English by a skills test examiner.” CDL Standards

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          What’s bad about performative actions in the form of executive orders applying rules to situations the president has clearly demonstrated he doesn’t understand?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If it is already part of the rules, what makes this EO a bad thing?

          It’s a power grab by the executive that will be used to, for example, harass minorities driving on the street. If it’s already part of the rules then it doesn’t need an executive order.

        • socphoenix@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          From my personal experience the bigotry towards non white non male folks in the industry can be pretty extreme, so off the very top of my head I can think of several ways a bombastic EO could inflame that worse. Not to mention I’d like my government to focus on fixing shit instead of meaningless performative bullshit

        • Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because this EO isn’t about speaking English for road safety. The same way locking trans people out of bathrooms isn’t about protecting women. Or how deporting green card holders and naturalised citizens isn’t about US Security.

          There are so many examples of this from the last 100 days. The US is honestly a lost cause at this point.

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So the party of small government is going to administer english tests to truck drivers? maybe create some kind of language registry with proficiency levels? sounds kinda woke

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was a video on ?imgur? in the past couple days, I didn’t know if it was real. Guy says he was a truck driver and had stopped at a weigh station. He said they asked if he could read and write English; he said yes. They gave him a piece of paper to read, which he did; they then told him to write those words down on another piece of paper, which was filled with identical words in various handwritings. He said he saw a bunch of people off to the side in handcuffs, and said that if you couldn’t speak or write English, you had to pay a $5000 “fine” on the spot, and that if you couldn’t pay, you were arrested on the spot and your driving license immediately suspended. There was some condition (I don’t remember what it was) where the trucking company might also have to pay a $10000 “fine”.

      The comments discussion pointed out that, if they had had $5000 to pay the “fine”, it likely would’ve been taken in civil forfeiture. There was also a robust discussion on whether this was real or not, trying to find other sources, which were slim and primarily referenced questionable sources.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Running the entire economy via a central planning committee is exactly the sort of right-wing free market the GOP voters wanted. I guess? Up is down. The past is alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s the double-think we’ve all come to know and love. Double plus good, party member

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The party of states rights (in areas they’re losing federally) makes yet another federal commandment in areas they want to gain ground on

      • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sorry, but the whole thing is ridiculous. Surely you are aware that there are countries (eg your neighbour to the north) that have more than one official language. As far as i know, only one city in Canada has bilingual signage, yet Canadians manage to drive safely all over the country without necessarily having proficiency in both languages. The european union has ??? languages and yet somehow manages to have safe roads. this is all part of trump’s pandering to the racist and xenophobic idiots who comprise his base.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Commerical driving licenses already require English proficiency so this is a non-issue. Now ask yourself why this particular administration is trying to “solve” a non-issue via executive order and not an act of Congress. Hint: It’s a power grab that will be used to the detriment of minorities.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah yes, those unqualified drivers that are being hired as professional truck drivers. It’s their lack of English skills that are the problem.

    How was their totally legitimate and law abiding employer supposed to know about their lack of ability or driving licence? They are the real victims here, being forced to hire them and all.

    • toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      ah, there’s the old rub. how many of trucking companies are going to be held accountable for hiring them? i’d wager it’s just about as many farmers that get fucked for hiring lettuce pickers. oh yeah, how’s that lettuce picking going now?

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, they will arrest people for not obeying an executive order that, and IANAL, has no basis in law? How will they be identifying these drivers? What is the justification for pulling them over?

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they’ll just add it as a requirement to do any work with federal jobs or something.

      The executive office in the us has so many levers of power it can pull that they don’t really need laws anymore.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they’re brown, pull 'em over.

      If you have to take off your sunglasses to understand their accent, arrest 'em

      -From the official executive order.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is already a Commercial Driver’s License requirement. What is the specific issue here?

    “Interpreters are prohibited during the administration of skills tests. Applicants must be able to understand and respond to verbal commands and instructions in English by a skills test examiner.” CDL Standards

      • uselessRN@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re right. You just need to be able to read, write, and understand instructions. Wait that sounds like knowing the language

        • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just like reddit to downvote someone who actually knows what the fuck they’re talking about because it doesn’t sound right to you.

          • uselessRN@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re being down voted by others. Mostly cause what you said is stupid

            • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              And yet I know more than you and am correct. Maybe because you are just guessing and don’t have actual first hand knowledge.

              It is quite common to have CDL drivers that only speak Spanish whether or not they’re supposed to be able to speak English.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can’t pull someone for “driving while brown”, but you can pull someone over for “driving while not speaking English, which I just concluded from you being brown”

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The same people who said they would remove big government that tries to control everything and everyone

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      oh, they still want total control… but only of those deemed ‘unworthy’. the ‘big’ government they want to get rid of is only the bits that watch what they (the rich fucks and their companies) do and might enforce laws that they break.

      • Pistcow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trucking is the quickest way to make $100k/year. It ain’t easy hours but demand for drivers is insanely high. My company at one point was offering $15k signing bonus for drivers.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I personally know at least a dozen that I work with daily at work that do not have any English fluency whatsoever.

        Actually it’s helped my Spanish skills lol

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I dunno how they did it. They’re third party contract drivers.

            But we do live in a very Spanish-speaking part of the country so it was probably as easy as finding a friendly enough bi-lingual examiner at the DMV.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was going to mostly crash anyway, when the ships stop coming next week, due to the tariffs.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I keep on thinking of the mad tv skit with the woman who says she can’t understand people with accents.