I can only imagine she was offered a low price.

Talk to the boss’s and explain the situation? I can’t imagine that to be a healthy work environment, I can’t imagine the company wanting their employees to not learn.

I haven’t looked at the code but I always assumed that println was a call to print with a new line added to the original input.
Something like this:

void print(String text) { ... }
void println(String text) { this.print(text + '\n'); }

That’s because ther nvidia driver broke the report button. /s

They are working hard on Cosmic, here is to hoping that we will see a full release soon^TM.

TIL

We do need vitamin B12 which can only be found (naturally) in the animal kingdom. It can be supplemented though.

Just so that I understand the question, are you asking why a shareholder has to pay property tax for the company?

I had to read that twice before I got it. Nice one.

How often does a shareholder get in trouble when corporate does a felony?

Never because they don’t decide how the company operates?

I requested a PTR record once from my ISP. They first didn’t understand what it was, then said they didn’t provide it. I didn’t have a static IP but still.

I meant, how did you delete all files??

I once wanted to move all the files in the folder was I in to another folder and I did something like mv /* ../. What is important here is that I did /* and not ./*. Fortunately it was only a raspberry pi so it went fast to flash the SD card.

Also, how did you go about reinstalling VLC if you deleted all dependencies?

Sorry, I should have been clearer. I found the second part of the comment super funny.

TL;DR: User has programming and sysadmin skils.

This is spot on!

EDIT: This was spot on. TL;DR below.

I stopped reading after the third word, I’m here for memes, not to read a damned book!

See, that’s your problem. You’re arguing, with me, about something that was said to you by someone else. Do you realize why I’m questioning your argumentative skills?

I’m sorry? You came to me.

Here is how I see it:

1. Someone compared AI to calculator/calendar
2. I said you cannot compare that
3. You asked why I even argue with the first person
4. I said that I want a better discussion
5. You said that I should stop dimissing other people’s arguments
6. I tried to explain why I don’t think it is a valid argument to compare LLM to “calculator can do reliably. or a timer. or a calendar.”
7. You did not seem to agree with me on that from what I understand.
8. And now we are here.

–

Here’s a source to a study

I don’t have the time to read the articles now so I will have to do it later, but hallucinations can definitively be a problem. Asking for code is one such situation where an LLM can just make up functions that does not exist.

No one ever said they were

https://lemmy.world/post/27126654/15901324

literally can’t do what a calculator can do reliably. or a timer. or a calendar.

Edit to add: For the record, I am very interested in your arguments and would love to read the reports that has come to the conlusion that LLMs produce bad output. That’s news to me (or I should say, a good prompt producing bad output. And what is considered bad and why?). So if you have a link to a report or something similar, please share. But don’t claim that I am trying to construct a strawman when the THE VERY FIRST argument provided to me in this very comment chain was what I have talked about all along.

Edit 2: Here is the personal attack, the other point I disagree with: https://lemmy.world/post/27126654/15901907

I’m am dismissing invalid arguments, that started all this. AIs are not calendars and should be used as such.

That is your opinon and that is fine. Just don’t attack people because they don’t agree, and don’t argue that LLMs are because because they can’t do what they are not made to do. It is okey to say the ChatGPT is shit because you can’t use it as a calendar if OpenAI is trying to market that. But that is not LLM in general.

If you want to shit on OpenAI because you think they stink, that is fine. If you want to shit on their LLM because you think it sucks, that is also fine. But don’t say that the concept of LLM sucks because OpenAI and their product is bad or their marketing of said product. Say that LLM sucks because there is no regulation and companies are using this to hurt people. Say that OpenAIs LLM suck because they took from the people to create it without giving back. Don’t say that OpenAIs LLM cannot produce good output becuase they stole, because the output is good. Stealing is still wrong. Don’t say that someone else is worse at what they are doing because they used an LLM. Say that they are worse at what they are doing because (and if) they cannot do it without an LLM.

It would be a nice discussion if you did not try to argue on bad faith. Of course I don’t want to compare something that is meant to kill with something that could if you really try. Should be ban ropes because you can strangle people with them? Of course not, that’s stupid and you know it.