• Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    When my these first arrived my brother was all about them. Dude was stoked and thought he was the next billionaire. I then asked him what’s to stop someone from copying the image? He shrugged and idk man man but im going all in. It was on that day that I knew my brother was tarded

    • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Tbh I get it from a certain point of view. We all made fun of bitcoin at first but now it’s pretty common for people to wish they could tell their younger self to get as much as they can afford.

      I get the idea of not wanting to miss out on the next thing that did that.

      • breecher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Bitcoin is still fucking shit. That just amounts to “I wish I was there first in this this pyramid scheme”. It doesn’t change what it is.

        • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Sure, never said otherwise, so you can see how someone could theoretically think maybe nft is the next bitcoin and want to get in early.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          There were enough layers in that pyramid and enough years in construction to have room for more people to make a buck.

          What’s the difference between a scam and a bubble, and is the bubble more legitimate or just a bigger, longer scam?

          • NFTs were a misuse of blockchain giving no real value. Plus it was very short term and really only rewarded scammers and manipulators. A true scam.
          • Crypto is better thought out and actually could serve as a currency. It has a bit more staying power and even enriched a few non-scammers. Does that make it a “bubble” ?
      • shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Did we make fun of bitcoin? It was a cool currency for buying drugs on the black market at first.

        • Agrivar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I made fun of it immediately, despite also recognizing and using its ability to facilitate online purchases of contraband.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      My one regret is that I will never be able to find all the really stubborn, dimwitted assholes on reddit who were screaming bloody death-threats at me for warning people that NFT’s were a scam, and be able to just verbally ream them out, fucking rub their faces in their own shit.

      I bet some of them are out there, reading this maybe, maybe they even recognize me.

      If so… hi. How you doin? 😊

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    When they were first blowing up, I thought sure, I’ll turn a couple old unreleased tracks of mine into NFTs. I signed up to some site I forget the name of, uploaded the tracks, and then then found out I had to pay something like $500 a track to turn them into NFTs. It was a pretty duh moment for me. Of course the content doesn’t mean shit, it’s just the money. I never paid them a dime and deleted my stuff.

    • kadup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      When I first heard of NFTs I thought the media was encoded within the blockchain - in that case sure, I wouldn’t necessarily buy one but I understand how that’d be interesting.

      Ten minutes later when I was told they are just proof of purchase that points to a URL hosting your monkey image somewhere, I knew they were a total scam

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    How do you know a crypto scheme is a scam?
    You already know, the answer is “yes”. It’s always “yes”.
    The only question is, can you hold the tiger’s tail just long enough to make a mint and still let go in time that you aren’t the last one holding it.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      can you hold the tiger’s tail just long enough

      The answer to this is also usually “no” because the people who set up the scamcoin usually don’t like to leave things to chance and have a plan for when to time their rug-pull.

      Trying to get in on these grifts is like spotting a bank-robbery in-progress and trying to join the crew and get paid. Sure it can happen, but you’re not exactly playing with the best odds of success.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s the big question: do you recognize the scam in time to take advantage of it, and have the awareness to get out in time when there are still suckers?

      I know a few people who made money on crypto in the early stages this way: recognize the scam but take advantage.

      It was probably possible to take similar advantage of the Trump bribe laundering crypto scam, even without the benefit of the insider trading and market manipulation

      I very briefly considered it but don’t trust my awareness to get out in time, plus participating in the scam would eat me up.

      • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I very briefly considered it but don’t trust my awareness to get out in time, plus participating in the scam would eat me up.

        Ya, one of the best pieces of advice I got was, “never gamble money you can’t afford to lose”. This is what keeps me out of trying to chase that tiger. Sure, it could be possible to make some money by jumping on one of these scams early and trying to ride sell the bump. But, it’s also likely that be the sucker losing out in the end. I’d rather not waste my money that way.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I get the impression that most of the people who are swindled by crypto nowadays are aware of the scam and jump into it thinking they’re going to make money by finding a greater fool to dump their participation the scheme on for a profit.

      Such people are really trying to be scammers in the scam.

      That explains them invariably rushing to defend whatever scam token they’re holding whenever it gets criticized in social media: if outsider are generally made to suspect the true nature of the scam and hence become unwilling to jump in, these wannabe scammers aren’t going to find a greater fool to take those tokens out of their hands and give them a nice profit.

      Of course as @ameancow@lemmy.world pointed out, these scams are done from the very start for maximum profitability of those starting the scam, not for the profit of the first ones to buy into it, so often those wannabe scammers end up being the greater fools of that scam themselves.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        You are absolutely right, just look at the popular investment subreddits, they don’t talk about long-term goals and successful investment strategies for retirement, etc. They talk about what the latest fast-buck is going to be, what the newest short or pump-and-dump is doing, they report on when a rug gets pulled or a bubble bursts so that their buddies can stop working in inflating it.

        It’s an entire industry of scams and cons, from crypto to the stock-market broadly, it’s all about short-term rewards at any cost.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I used to work in Tech back in the late 90s, during the first bubble and up to the Tech Crash. I also worked in both Investment Finance and Tech Startups much more recently.

          I can’t even begin to describe just how angry, disgusted and dissapointed this unholly intersection between Tech and Hyperspeculative-Finance of the XXI century makes me.

          The whole spirit in pretty much the entire domain of Tech back in the 90s was completely different from this neverending bottomless swamp of crap we have in the supposedly innovative parts of Tech.

          Ever since the sleazy slimeballs who saw from the first Tech bubble that there were massive opportunities to use Tech-mumbu-jumbo to extract money from suckers started (immediatly after the Crash) trying to pump the Net bubble back up (they even called it Web 2.0) that the old spirit of innovation for the sake of improving things of the old days in Tech was crushed and replaced by the most scammy, fraudulent, naked greed imaginable.

          After my time in Finance (which, curiously, also involved a Crash in the Industry I was working in) I started describing Tech Startups as “The Even Wilder Wild West of Speculative Finance”.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah it’s such a degeneracy……

            When I worked in investments, it was all about finding the best statistical model to balance returns against risk. It was fascinating how complex the models could be, and even included currency hedging to reduce the risk of exchange rates. And most importantly to also minimize trades to control costs and tax impact. This was before lightning trading: plenty of the funds were monthly trading. Those were the good old days when a better algorithm could shave points enough to stand out but everyone was on similar footing

          • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            After my time in Finance (which, curiously, also involved a Crash in the Industry I was working in)

            A-ha! We’ve found the cause of the market crashes.

            Joking aside, I was around for the dotcom bubble burst and the 2008 crash. Both were caused by wild speculation and we seemed to have learned nothing from them. I have little doubt we’re headed for another recession and it will again, be driven by speculation. We also have a problem with private equity (I call them “vulture equity”) which likes to capitalize on businesses which are struggling . They swoop in, buy up the company in a leveraged buyout, and then start extracting as much value from the company as possible. Usually this is in the real estate that the company owns. Once all of the value is extracted, the company is spun back off, saddled with the debt used to buy the company in the first place, and then it flounders until it ultimately collapses. This was the fate of companies like Sears or Red Lobster. Once a vulture equity company engages in a leveraged buyout of a company, that company is doomed.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Yeah, well, Asset Owners and the Speculators who caused the 2008 Crash got saved by Governments all around the World with public money and that was done by taking money away from those whose income comes from their Work (notice how salaries keep getting less and less able to cover living costs all the while asset prices keep beating records).

              What I learned from the 2008 Crash - being right smack in the middle of the Industry which made it happen and spending the subsequent years observing what Governments were doing to “recover” from it and trying to figure out “how did this happen” - was that politicians don’t work for most people, they work for a handful of people, and when push comes to shove they’ll sacrifice the rest to make sure those few keep on accumulating riches.

              The fishy speculation that played around the line separating Legal from Fraud has in the aftermath of the 2008 Crash fully became Fraud and more, once the industry figured out that politicians from the main parties had their backs, which is why we find ourselves were we are now. This was especially so in places like the US and UK were power is a duopoly which just alternates between two groups of politicians who all frequent the same social circles and send their children to the same private schools.

              It’s a big group and we ain’t in it.

          • Agrivar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Fuck. Yup. I was working in industrial automation in the late 90s, and then transitioned to network engineering at a global scale. Around 2000, the entire vibe seemed to shift. I walked out just before 9/11 and am so glad to be in an entirely different industry now.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s a big part of knowing when to get out. They don’t. …… or maybe they do: I don’t know if that scam is still finding enough suckers.

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Unfortunately for them that ship has sailed. It’s not hard to get in on a scam like this of you do it early enough, i probably would have done it if i had enough money when this started (don’t judge, much, money is important when you don’t have it) and i probably would have gotten out like a bandit. Now though, it’s mostly targeting them.

    • Googledotcom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Scam or not some of them are very useful to pay for some not so legal things

      Investing in currency is already dumb, in cryptocurrency? Doubly so

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    There use to always be a crowd of TSLA stock owners (fewer now) defending Tesla in posts criticising Musk and Tesla, and similarly lots of people who are clearly cryptocurrency owners coming out of the woodworks to defend cryptocurrencies in posts critical of them.

    Under this post we seem to be getting a lot of NFT owners doing the same: “selling their book” as they say in Finance.

    People will say any old bollocks and dissemble like pros to keep up interest in the “investment” assets they own until they find a greater fool to dump them on.

    Makes me think of the difference in the discourse around Bitcoin back in the early days vs latter stages: NFTs were created from the very go as way of separating fools from their money so the talk around them has always been swindlers’ talk - or if you want to describe it in a positive light, “the grifters grift” - but Bitcoin did not start as a vehicle for money making, and I remember back in the beginnings of Bitcoin how the talk was very different - mainly naive idealism - and how it changed over time as greedy types became a greater and greater part of those who had bought Bitcoin.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      There use to always be a crowd of TSLA stock owners (fewer now) defending Tesla

      Seems like a resurgence now, plus I’m seeing a lot more misleading videos.

      This time it’s worse: all scam and manipulation.

      Before there were a lot of true believers and the bubble went on too long to be just a scam

  • fiddledeedee@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    i smoked a joint with an one of those ape drawings on the jar last night, that was a Nice Fuckin Toke

  • Googledotcom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I had too much money once. I bought some nft Reddit avatars for like 2k and it is still there somewhere but I am too lazy to even check on that

    It’s somewhere there some kind of nft safe they have or something like that. It’s all very clunky.

    I think I had to note down some access code at some point or something like that, it’s all too tiring to remember and unclear if there is anything you can do with it

      • Googledotcom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It’s just money right, it’s not like there’s a shortage.

        At some point it only goes up and up, multiplicating like some kind of sex starved horny rabbits. Population of which you are informed monthly by some clean but boring site: -0.67%, 2.27%, -1.23%… which for some reason is trying hard to appeal to you and that fake tone seeps through every second word on their butt licking reports.

        Please use our services, oh maam please. We are here for you please use us

    • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Honestly provides basically no benefits that existing token systems don’t already handle. Games have been tracking completely unique items as commodities in a large market for a long time - the only benefit new to NFT was decentralization, which basically nobody peddling them understands anyway.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The only thing it opens up is that as a game developer I can make a contract that turns NFT items from another game into NFT items of my game. Like HyperDragons that you level up by feeding them CryptoKitties, without consent or approval from CryptoKitties devs.

        But why on earth, as a game developer, would you ever do that… Well, other than as a PR stunt.

  • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    We will need an immutable signature for content at some point moving forward since AI is going to be so prevalent and it will be easy to make fraudulent clips, podcasts etc. NFTs would be perfect for this.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      What would be the advantage over current digital signatures?

      The idea of NFT was not as much a proof of authenticity, but more like a way to sell and but those signatures.

      In the context of AI I don’t see an advantage to having a easy way to sell your private key sort of speaking.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not any moreso than any other signature verification method, and we already have several better than NFTs.

  • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The amount of ignorance regarding crypto is too damn high. I agree that NFT’s are stupid, always felt that way, but when people just say a “all crypto is a scam” really don’t understand what they are saying. There’s a plenty of legit crypto products out there, but yes, the vast majority are just garbage. Invest in the blue chips, the REAL industry of crypto, not memes or things no ones ever heard of before. (Bitcoin, Solana, Ethereum, etc…)

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a solution in search of a problem. Currencies are government backed because the vast majority of people have faith in their governments’ enforcement of legislation regarding use of that currency. It’s good to be able to make class action lawsuits against scammers and most in the population will choose anything government backed if they have the option.

      So if the goal is to get away from government backing, who do you give control to? In the case of a blockchain, it’s the parties with the majority of the “proof of XYZ” creation hardware. Which are not normal people. Then there’s the possibility of developers of a blockchain choosing to rewrite the ledger, causing splits. So you didn’t invent some unmodifiable currency either, the control lies with people who you probably should trust even less than the parties managing EUR/USD.

      Then, it’s incredibly energy inefficient. Especially proof of work is a ridiculous waste of computational resources, at least tie the problem to something NP-hard with actual value instead of whatever reverse hashing search is usually done. But wasting resources is the design of the system anyways.

      • SparroHawc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        it’s the parties with the majority of the “proof of XYZ” creation hardware. Which are not normal people.

        Originally the idea was that it WOULD be normal people using their own CPU cycle time to secure the chain and mint new blocks. Even then, as long as no one party holds the majority of hash power, the incentive is to support the security of the coin rather than subvert it. The moment that changes is the moment that Bitcoin dies, because no one will be able to trust it any more - which also means there is an incentive to make sure there are enough competing BTC farms.

        there’s the possibility of developers of a blockchain choosing to rewrite the ledger, causing splits.

        The blockchain is upheld by the combination of the developers and the miners. If the developers aren’t acting in good faith and the miners don’t like it, they don’t move to the new chain. Sure, you get a split, but odds are one of them is going to die.

        • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          People don’t care because crypto is literally a made up thing.

          Sure, people make money off of it. But people make money off loads of things. That doesn’t change that it’s literally a made up currency that has tons of people scamming the shit out of people for a quick buck.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Solana and Ethereum are both centralized scams that have been going down vs Bitcoin for the last year, despite the bull market.

      • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Scams with ETFs regulated by the government, audited by the government through MANY lawsuits, multiple bills being proposed to regulate the indusy… so scammy right? Legit products. Both of them. Centralization isn’t a make or break for any crypto really, they don’t have to be decentralized to be a valid product.

        And price doesn’t matter at all, not sure why you even mention it. It bears nothing on the conversation at all.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          lol yes absolutely they are. Yes the government is allowing legal scams. Yes scammers win lawsuits. Yes congress supports scams. A government stamp doesn’t make trusting some corporate CEO a good idea; it just means they paid the bribes.

          “Blue chips” typically perform well, especially relative to their risk. You’ve got all the risks of Bitcoin, plus trust in a central party that needs government permission.

      • mrbubblesort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure, but millennials weren’t the generation that brought us things like this. They thought they could horde them to fund their kids college. I know firsthand, my mom spent hundreds of thousands on them claiming they would only go up. Now she’s got nothing. God forbid she buy a fucking savings bond.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Uh oh, you’ve offended the people who are prone to falling for scams and grifts. Across multiple generations.

      • mrbubblesort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I think it’s also the younger users here don’t know/remember the time when all Boomers flipped their shit and thought Beanie Babies were THE ONE TRUE investment strategy. They didn’t watch their parents blow their entire retirement fund on a scam. Instead they were the ones that actually got to play with them, so naturally they look back on them fondly.

  • John@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    I quite enjoyed supporting artists like Ame72 and Sabat by purchasing their digital artwork. 🤷‍♀️

    I don’t see how it’s much different than Patreon. You pay creators that you enjoy, you get a digital collectable, and access to discord of you care about that sort of thing. NFTs allowed many people to do art full-time.

    • breecher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You didnd’t purchase their artwork though. The fact that you still haven’t figured that out says a lot about what kind of customerbase was needed to get NFTs off the ground.

      • John@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        So if somebody buys my digital photos off Deviant art, they didn’t “purchase my photos”? Geez, I better go call that TV studio that used some of my work and let them know they got scammed.

        When I hired a wedding photographer 15 years ago and got the digitals, did I get scammed?

        Are you against people buying anything digital or just the underlying technological platform?

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s having a legal contract that passes the intellectual property to your name and a Legal System backing that contract with the power and willingness to enable the use of Force to confiscate the property of contract breakers, that give you de facto ownership rights.

          That’s the essential difference between your example and NFTs.

          Thinking that a mere “ownership certificate” which is not legally recognized is “ownership” is just a variant of the Sovereign Citizen delusions only with “magical” bytes instead of “magical” words - techno-magical mumbu jumbo for people who can’t understand that symbols not backed by enforcement structures mean nothing in a society.

          An “ownership stamp”, no matter how technically advanced, which is not recognized or backed by a Legal System gives you de facto no ownership rights because nothing will back you up when others disregard your claims of ownership asserted by that “ownership stamp” and if you yourself try to enforce it that Legal System will likely turn against you depending on how you try and enforce yourself your ownership claims (for example if you do something legally deemed Theft or Assault it’s you who ends up in facing the might of the Legal System).

          That’s the essence of the complete total idiocy of thinking NFTs are ownership: ownership is not merely having a “certificate of ownership”, it’s there being societal structures that recognize your ownership and will back you up when you want to assert ownership rights. In fact, most ownership does not require any certificates, digital or otherwise, just an entry in a database of the appropriate Legal Registrar of ownership.

          As I said, thinking it’s some made up certificate of ownership that gives you ownership rights is Sovereign Citizen “logic”

          • John@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s having a legal contract that passes the intellectual property to your name and a Legal System backing that contract with the power and willingness to enable the use of Force to confiscate the property of contract breakers, that give you de facto ownership rights.

            Here’s an excerpt of the “Holder Rights” explicitly outlined from a very very very large and well known music artist who released music NFTs:

            “[Redacted] token holders have full commercial rights to their unique version. They can remix and release it, play it publicly, or use it in other content like videos.”

            “[Redacted] includes the ability to render full quality audio files and to render individual tracks as Stems to make edits and remixes easy.”

            “Holders do not have exclusive rights, meaning they cannot remove their version from [redacted] or stop it from showing up in NFT marketplaces like OpenSea.”

            “If you do use a version commercially, you should not sell the token. If you do, you will transfer the rights and may need to obtain permission from the new owner to coninue your use.”

            “Every buyer will be responsible for their own copyright claims.”

            Do you think this would hold up in a court of law?

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s pretty much a standard non-exclusive commercial licensing contract, same as you get from places that license musice for commercial use like Envato - it makes that token a tranferable license for that work with the licensing rights defined there and no more than that, and legally gives you no ownership (i.e. the copyright being yours) of those works.

              Per those terms the copyright owner (which is not the person who has ownership of the token, as per those terms that only gives them a commercial license to use that work) can license it to other people under whatever terms they want.

              Oh, and all of that is backed by Copyright laws, not by whatever technical solution was used for the NFT - they could’ve just as easilly used a seashell or a piece of paper as ownership “token”.

              If you bought an NFT which is a token for this work as per these contract terms, thinking you own the music, you’ve been had and should’ve had a lawyer check it out first.

              • John@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                So your chief complaint is mainly a semantical one related to the terms outlined, and not the underlying platform. Got it. Thanks for the responses. ☺️

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  You did not make the case that NFTs add value over a standard non-exclusive commercial licensing contract with your example and instead showed us an NFTs which even when actually backed by a contract does not provide “ownership”, thus confirming my point and that of previous posters that NFTs by themselves don’t given ownership.

                  Beyond that, if you think legally defined intellectual contract language elements like “ownership” and “licensing” are just semantics, you’re going to be sorelly dissapointed when trying to assert your ownership of those assets.

          • renzev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            bruh it’s really not that difficult. Fan sends money to artist. Fan receives some magical bytes in return. Could fan have right clicked and downloaded the artwork without paying? Of course. But fan wants to support artist. Because fan likes artist’s art. It’s how any digital “marketplace” works, NFT or not. All this “legal system” and “ownership” and “legal registrar” nonsense you’re pulling up is completely irrelevant. You’re reading too much into it.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              “Bruh”, your problem is exactly that in your mind it’s all simple even though you live in a Society right next to millions of people and you somehow think that what you believe because you read it on a website gives you “rights” that those millions of people will respect just because you say so.

              It’s like thinking that a toilet needs not be connected to a sewage line to handle your shit or the electricity for your house appears by merelly having power lines rather than coming via them from where it gets generated via a complex infrastruture to get it to you.

              It’s the Soverign Citizen kind of take on the world, and the results are pretty much the same for techno-deluded kind of Soverign Citizen as for the document-deluded ones: nobody else respects your claims to having certain rights hence the only worth you can extract from such “certificates” is from finding and swindling even greater fools to sell those “certificates” to.

              • renzev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                You’re putting words in my mouth. I didn’t say shit about “rights” and “respect”. The guy in the original comment mentioned nothing about it either. You said that. You’re bringing this idea into the conversation and then arguing against yourself. Seriously, what is your endgame here?

                I genuinely have no clue what you think I “read on a website” about NFTs. To set the record straight, my understanding of NFTs is that you have a ledger where your public key is associated with a token short string of characters, and every computer participating in the ledger agrees on that. that’s it. All of these ideas of “ownership” and “rights” and societal analogies is bullshit you brought into the conversation.

                • John@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Seriously, what is your endgame here?

                  They just really really really hate NFTs/crypto for some reason. I can’t imagine ever getting so worked up about a technology like people do today about crypto. I want to support an artist so apparently I need to have a PhD in contract and IP law in order to do so.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  As per another poster higher up this thread:

                  You didnd’t purchase their artwork though. The fact that you still haven’t figured that out says a lot about what kind of customerbase was needed to get NFTs off the ground.

                  You seem to have chosen a very specific, very “curious” cutoff point for contextual relevance of responses not alligned with your opinion in this thread in order to claim my response to you is some wild unrelated “bullshit”.

                  Further, you responded to my comment criticising NFTs as a means of guaranteing ownership, with an example usage that has nothing to do with ownership and were NFTs do literally nothing useful at all (you can just send the money to the artist if indeed your objective is to “contribute to the artist” no NFTs required), so per your own logic your post is bullshit you brought into the conversation.

                  Your example provides no support for the idea being discussed by everybody else in this thread, so either that post of yours is bullshit you brought into the conversation (since it goes out on a tangent and doesn’t support the points I was replying to or made in my comment) or you wanted to support the idea that NFTs are useful and failed miserably and now are just criticizing me for following you down your irrelevant tangent to the points being discussed in the thread.

                  Seriously, what is your endgame here?

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      yeah exactly I still haven’t heard a single explanation of what makes NFTs a “scam”. People just shout that word and expect you to accept it. Seriously, which part of a consensual transaction between two well-informed parties qualifies as a “scam”?

      • John@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        There is undoubtedly a huge number of rugpulls, vaporware, empty promises, and outright scams with NFTs. But this is true of any nascent technology, any sort of project like this. The reason so many people know about it and are aware about it is because of the permissionless and open nature of crypto which allows people to see these projects in realtime.

        IMO it’s neither good nor bad. It’s just nascent tech. For an artist like Sabet, it’s obviously good! It gets people exposed to his art, with a low entry barrier, and allows people to support him. For people like Trump, it’s pretty clearly bad, and it just allows him to scam/rugpull people easier and faster.