• teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      128
      ·
      2 months ago

      The oldest millennials are in their early 40s now but to boomers they will always be teens.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was so bad that the PC software that came with the camera often had a red eye removal feature. I remember being fascinated when I figured out you could use it on things other than eyes and it just took the red out of anything.

      • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My oldest nephew was born in 2003 and I was still having to manually remove red eye using Paintshop Pro 7 from my mum’s digital photos of him when was about 6 or 7.

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hell, even the older Gen-Z grew up with analog cameras, VHS players, paper maps, and no computers.

      I’m not sure people realize zoomers are almost 30, and millennials are nearing 50.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Red eye happens because of the flash. So still happens on digital cameras. It’s just nowadays they automatically detect and correct for it after the shot has taken. Or some cameras can do a pre flash before the flash for the shot fires or a light turns on when you half press the shutter button. That way the pupil will shrink and less light will enter the pupil and not light up the back of the eye.

      • Twiglet@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I hate cameras that do the pre-flash with a burning passion, there’s a period in time where every (flash) photo of me either has me with my eyes closed or visibly straining to keep them open.

    • oppy1984@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously, I remember taking a disposable camera with me on our school trip Washington. I also remember that it was during that trip that we all found out you could open those things up and turn them into mini tasers.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Right? Who made this? What millennial doesn’t remember red eye, it was in every damn photo when I was a kid and Im not a particularly old millennial.

    • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had a super cool N64 film camera that I took with me to sleepovers and took lots of shitty photos with because I was a dumbass kid that didn’t know anything about photography.

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    When the fuck do we get to retire from the “young and stupid” category?

    Also, I had red eyes in most photos from my child- and teenhood. I spent a lot of money on film in my teens before I got my first phone with a proper camera in 2007.

    Next you’re gonna condescendingly explain what a floppy disc or a cassette tape is too? Even Gen z is old enough to know about those.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t think you properly understand how generations work.

      • A Boomer is anyone older then me who I disagree with.
      • A millennial is anyone younger then me who I disagree with.
      • Someone from Gen Z is anyone younger than me who uses a technology (usually a social media site) I don’t like.
      • Nangijala@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you were concerned, then why not send a private message instead? “Not trying to be rude”, sure. Sounds like you’re trying to intimidate. Maybe you shouldn’t do that.

  • FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    I, Gen Z, am old enough too remember the red eyes on photos? What is this trying to say xd

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    People call “millennials” young because they are old but too proud to say “teenagers”.

    Plus the generational infighting is what the ruling class will use to replace or supplement the culture war.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      110 film! The first time I figured out that capacitors hurt was when I dropped a 110 film camera. The front plate popped off and when I tried to pick up the camera, I touched the wrong part of the circuit board and the flash cap discharged into my hand. I dropped the camera, and it recharged the capacitors. I picked it up again and got zapped again. Was not the brightest kid. Picked it up more carefully and popped the front plate back on. Camera was fine. Entire cartridge of film developed perfectly.

  • jedibob5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wait, do digital cameras not do the red eye effect? Now that I think about it, I don’t think I’ve seen a photo with red eye in it in a long time, but I had always assumed that was a consequence of the camera flash, not the film…

    Edit: TIL that camera redeye does come from the flash, but it hasn’t been much of a thing these days because today’s phones/cameras adjust the flash timing to compensate. Thanks for the replies!

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hardly anyone takes photos with a flash anymore.
      Phones instead crank up the sensitivity and use AI to get rid of the noise (=draw an image that vaguely resembles what’s in front of the camera).

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        The sensors themselves are also slightly better than 20 years ago, much less 40. Meaning they can probably produce a nicer image before all the AI shit.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh god , remember the anti red eye flash that strobed for a second before the flash?

        I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

          I understood it as the red eyes you see in photos is the wide open iris of an eye you’re photographing zooming in on the blood vessels in the back of the eye. Flashing bright light before the photo makes the iris of the person you’re photographing contract significantly, so you can’t see the blood vessels in the back of the eye anymore.

        • 0xSim@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, that’s it. A first (few) flash(es) to contract your retina, and then the flash to take the picture.

    • dreugeworst@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I distinctly remember early Facebook and its predecessors being filled with red-eye pictures

      • jedibob5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Now that you mention it, I think you might be right… My memory’s not the best lol. From the other replies, it seems that the rarity of redeye these days comes from the timing of modern cameras’ flash, not whether or not it uses film.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The red eye effect happens when flash reflects off the retina. Compact cameras (film and early digital) had flash very close to the lens, so there was a high chance of that happening.

      Not much of a chance these days, when most people take photos with cell phones, the cellphone cameras have adequate low light performance so you don’t need flash to begin with, and the “flash” is just an LED that isn’t as luminous as a real flash bulb.

  • JPSound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mhhh… yes, we millenials who are approaching or are already in our 40s… what’s all that red eye stuff about?

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Fun fact some may find disturbing, when you see a red-eye photo you’re actually looking at the inside of the person’s eyeballs. Red-eye in photos happens when a camera flash reflects off the back of the eye, specifically the choroid, a layer rich in blood vessels behind the retina. When the flash is too quick for the pupil to contract, the light enters the eye and bounces off this red tissue, giving you a great picture of the inside of their eyeballs. I hope everyone enjoys knowing that as much as I have.

    • SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      And when it’s not red, you have a serious issue going on. This is actually how a couple initially noticed something was wrong with their toddler’s eye. Turned out she had cancer. She’s a healthy adult now, with a glass eye, but I have never looked at red eyes in photographs in a negative way since then.