NASA, with the tampons.

  • perishthethought@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    10 days ago

    NASA once asked astronaut Sally Ride if 100 tampons would be enough for her week-long mission in space, but she later clarified that this number was excessive. While the engineers were concerned about potential needs, Ride humorously noted that a much smaller amount would suffice.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      10 days ago

      Tbh, this is not quite as dumb as it sounds. Tampons weigh nothing and if there’s no way to resupply, it’s not quite as dumb to take more than you need. What if, for example, there’s a series defect on these things and a large portion of them are defective?

      In fact, when they asked her said it’s excessive, to which they told her they wanted to be on the safe side, so she said to cut it in half and bring 50pcs (which is still excessive for most periods, but on the safe side).

      In fact, in the same mission they also brought jelly beans, which were entirely irrelevant to the mission, because Reagan insisted on his favourite snack to go to orbit. They were likely heavier than 100 tampons and also much less necessary up there.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Tampons weigh nothing

        When you’re dealing with the tyranny of rocketry, every gram matters.

        That said, I agree with your point. The mass and volume was well within acceptable mission parameters.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      On NASA defence is not the first time that due problems with vehicles an astronaut have to stay up there for much much much longer than their planed stance.

      At the end I think the astronaut said that 50 would be enough. So the NASA estimate wasn’t really that far off. As it’s totally normal for a woman to use half or double the tampons than other woman during period.

      But it is a funny story indeed.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Still a pretty dumb approach by the NASA guys. Didn’t it occur to them to ask a woman - any woman - before coming up with the initial estimate? Like “hey Sally, how many tampons do you normally need during your period? OK we’ll triple that for a safety margin.” There. Done.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        They did ask her. Sure, they could have asked how many instead, but it probably came in a 100 count well within any significant mass margins, so they just asked if 100 would be enough.

        • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 days ago

          it probably came in a 100 count

          A 100-count box seems like an absurdly large unit size. Are you doing the very thing that the anecdote is intended to highlight?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 days ago

            They definitely come in 100 counts. This part isn’t speculation. I have no Idea what NASA procurement looks like though, and I don’t have anyone to ask.

    • Corn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      100/hour? That might be enough, but we really want wider safety margins, don’t you think?

  • brem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    10 days ago

    One of my favorite things about Lemmy ~ Star Trek references can occur anywhere, at any given moment.

    I have a personal metric system for rating social networking platforms based on the percentage of Trekkies/Trekkers.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      I just wish I saw more Star Wars references but not that bootleg Disney crap, I like my star wars like I like my bands in the EU.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        As a purist, we can agree that the only real series was TNG, this was the cornerstone, built on the hallowed but kind of silly ground made by the original series, but followed by DS9 when we grew up a little, and we can kinda accept Voyager was a thing that happened somewhere in the distance but we don’t get too close.

        There was nothing else. The franchise ended and we all moved on, happy for the good run. “ALL GOOD THINGS…”

        • atomic@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          wtf is a Star Trek “purist” and why should anyone care about your arbitrary opinion?

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            why should anyone care about your arbitrary opinion

            By this metric, what’s the point of even browsing any forums or websites at all? Everything is someone’s arbitrary opinion, if it makes you feel bad to read something you disagree with, you can’t fix that outside of yourself.

            • atomic@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              I love that your response to what a “star trek purist” is is a defense of bs opinions on the internet

              • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                It probably means different things for different people, because like every other fandom, it’s kinda arbitrary.

                I was kind of purist. I started with TOS, but TNG, DS9, and VOY were right then too. Didn’t care as much for Voyager, but it was ok. Skipped Enterprise completely. I have TAS but haven’t watched it. Actively disliked the Kelvin movies. I’ve missed all the new stuff because I don’t stream, except Lower Decks, which I find delightful. I’m gonna pick up Picard and SNW soon.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                My actual response to someone so cynical and unable to relax and banter about hobbies and fandoms is to block them. Bye.

              • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                I guess you missed the part where he quoted the exact part of your comment that he was replying to. Or do you just want to ignore that part so you don’t have to defend it?

                • atomic@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  you mean like they ignored the part of me asking what a “star trek purist” is? maybe you can shed some light on that.

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          A purist would know that it’s not Star Trek if Kirk, Spock, and McCoy are not present. We don’t need French men with English accents or William T. Ripoff!

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              Focus that energy on areas that are making people actually contentious and hateful towards each other like rampant capitalistic greed, subversion of democracy and internet grifters who manufacture hate for engagement. Talking shit about the shows we like and don’t like is fun.

              People have been debating their standards for media, entertainment and franchises for longer than we have written history. Literally, look up Roman graffiti. It’s fine, it’s fun even. If you’re seeing malice and stress in these kinds of debates, you need to back away from it entirely for a bit. Just don’t get involved, stay healthy.

              • Nico198X@europe.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 days ago

                part of that is calling out negative behaviours. critique is one thing. but there are too many shitbirds today who think it’s somehow cool and erudite to yuck other people’s yums.

                as you said, a lot of the blame for encouraging and normalizing that behaviour goes to grifters, social media, capitalism. but every person gets to make a choice on what kind of person they want to be today and what energy they want to put out.

                more ppl need to start choosing the good.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I agree, but after spending some time here, it’s amazing how sensitive the people are about their fandoms on these more niche communities. Like guys, come on… it’s just entertainment, you’re allowed to have opinions, not everything should make you feel so stressed.

      At least in larger sites like reddit people can have lighthearted spats and debates about silly things like media. Some of the folks here really need some sunlight.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 days ago

    I just don’t feel like a real man if I don’t have my 125 daily lagers. I would surmise astronauts are the same. Maybe that’s why nothing gets done up there,… they’re being rationed !

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’d think that but due to reduced gravity in LOE it takes more beer to feel like a man. You can calculate the number of beers required by taking the number of beers at sea level times the distance from sea level in kilometers.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 days ago

      Plus like what if the mission lasts for a long time. If I plan on spending a week at a friend’s house but end up being there for much longer it won’t hurt to have more beers.

      If we’re using NASA as a reference Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were in space for 286 days instead of a planned week long mission. I definitely would rather have 100 beers in that situation over 12 beers

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        If we’re using NASA as a reference Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were in space for 286 days instead of a planned week long mission.

        They did get resupplied with additional clothing and personal effects after a few weeks.

        Coincidentally, there is no laundry or shower on the international space station.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 days ago

          True, but just in case, would still rather have the 100 beers. Plus if I know more beers are coming I can worry less about rationing the beers

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Nah. Heat is a real issue on the space station. Maybe a 6 pack for the three Xonauts that were up there, but excess sweating and excess heat production is a real concern for the ISS, or really any spacecraft, they have heatsinks that stick into a vacuum, and that is the problem. The vacuum is only ≈3K, or -270.15° C, but a vacuum is not particularly receptive to heat dispersal. Up on the ISS or any other spacecraft, you really wouldn’t want alcohol at all. It would absolutely cause you to burn too hot, causing excess heat to be introduced into the system.

            Weed edibles should be a better option. Specifically NOT flower or concentrates since even a vape is going to be introducing, potentially, too much heat into the craft.

            Actually, I wanna see some Xonauts do some Shrooms.

            • mkwt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              The vacuum is only ≈3K, or -270.15° C, but a vacuum is not particularly receptive to heat dispersal.

              This is true for all of the black parts of the sky.

              It is not true for that big yellow ball that shines on the space station half of the time. That big yellow ball is as bright and hot as a hot desert day on the surface. Daylight can raise the vacuum temp up to +250 or +300 C. And it also means that the night time temps don’t cool down all the way to 3K.

              So the ISS is continuously exposed to these thermal cycles on the outside. As a heat load these should dwarf any marginal heat loads introduced by whatever recreational drugs. And the station has to have radiator capacity handle it all plus margin. Remember, too, that the ISS crew also has to do hard exercise 2 hours per day.

              • kautau@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                So what you’re saying is the cooling system would in fact be OK with my 100 beer ration

                • mkwt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Yes, but you won’t be okay with the two hour treadmill sessions after drinking 100 beers.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Coincidentally, there is no laundry or shower on the international space station.

          Adding to that: Worn clothes are “thrown out the window” and burn up in the atmosphere.

      • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        I feel like informing women astronauts the current stock level of tampons on the ISS will come across as misogynistic, regardless of how factual and procedural the conveyance of information would be.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m not sure whether that’s a hot take, and I know there are different levels of tolerance, but I think you might have a problem if you drink 20 beers in 2-3 days (assuming 4-6% alcohol). Or at least you will probably have, starting day 2 :D

    • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean, if you’re doing a full weekend of activities with friends those beers could be spaced out far enough that you’re never more than slightly buzzed (small cans, <5%ABV). But yeah, if it’s a regular thing, it’s not a great look.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah if you crack open the first cold one at noon when it gets hot while you’re helping with some outdoors work and finish your last one at 3 AM talking shit with your friends, you probably never get drunk with those amounts. If you drink it all over 4 hours per evening, different story.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      There is a big difference if it’s a periodic activity or a one time party thing. If it’s a one time one, it’s not a big deal, apart from heavy hangover afterwards.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        You can get permament drunk guy syndrome/brain damage (people who look drunk even when sober) from consuming too much in a short period (chugging like crazy), so that one party can potentially (EDIT: Pay attention to this word and stop blowing things out of proportion lemmy! Potential does not mean always, it means there is a chance involved) fuck you up more than periodical drinking. I think it was called alcoholic cerebellar degeneration. This is why I refuse to touch strong drinks like vodka and whenever I drink beer, I take a sip once per minute or two, not chug the can in 5 minutes, and never drink again in the next few days.

        Consume your drugs responsibly, people.

        • Patches@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Do you realize how much “too much” is in your scenario?

          Like alcohol poisoning dead level. Can’t walk. Can’t stay awake. Can’t breathe. Can’t do anything.

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            And I’ve seen people like that in parties. Several times in my life, it resulted with ER visit. Said people are younger than me and already look drunk even when sober, while others who enjoy the occosional beer after work are fine their entire lives.

            Did not realize how much lemmy defends alcohol, and I’m from East Europe where I’ve seen more than you’ll ever read online.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              This isn’t about “defending” anything. Alcohol is a dangerous substance. And most people here know that.

              That said your level of fear mongering is extreme to say the least. You sound like someone telling everyone not to go within 1km of an ankle deep pond because they’ll drown.

              While possible in both cases to get permanent brain damage or drown. It is extremely unlikely on a winning a large lotto level.

              Almost all people will pass out or start throwing up, long before they get near that level. Especially if they are not already an alcoholic with huge tolerance.

              Source: 20 year hard core binge drinking alcoholic (20-30 drinks a day or more). That has been in the hospital 6 times for withdraw myself. And in rehab multiple times with large groups of other extreme alcoholics…

              Edit: I strongly suspect most (if not all) those you thought had that condition were actually under the influence. Daily drinking alcoholics are extremely good at both hiding it ( oh I have to go to the bathroom) and lying about. They will tell you straight to your face they haven’t had a drink in weeks after you just caught them drinking a beer.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Alcoholic cerebellar degeneration is caused by chronic consumption.
          If you aren’t alcoholic already, and unless you have some very specific condition, the body will start getting rid of alcohol way quicker than you will be consuming it, through any means necessary.
          Drinking a lot is still dangerous, but mostly due to drunken behaviour.
          You’re indeed right that drugs should be consumed responsibly, and alcohol is poison, but it’s also not that dangerous, unless it’s an addiction.

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            the body will start getting rid of alcohol way quicker than you will be consuming it, through any means necessary.

            This shit is getting upvoted while I’m getting downvoted? Tell this to any medical professional and they will look at you the same way I look at flat earthers. Alcohol metabolism is capped, while your ability to consume it isn’t nearly as capped as your body’s ability to deal with it. That “by any means necessary” makes it far worse. Those who know, will know.

            Another side note - tolerance /= faster metabolism.

            Chug on few vodkas per hour and report back to me about your myth (or should I say, forward your autopsy report to me?)

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              My man, if you think I didn’t do my fair share of stupid drinking, you’re severely underestimating what college does to a young man.
              Things that I did and not particularly proud of:

              • drinking a standart 0.5 liter bottle of vodka in one gulp (the trick is to swirl it so it does a little whirlwind, this way it creates laminal flow)
              • drinking 80% proof alcohol like it was regular vodka
              • drinking so much beer in one sitting, it was sloshing inside me like I was a baloon.
              • much much more.

              Was it not smart? Yeah, totally. Was it fun? If you account for all the vomiting and hangovers and states of total drunkinnes, overal no, it wasn’t fun, don’t recommend. Did it give me any permanent damage including death? Nope, I was lucky enough to be smart enough to not make it an addiction, and because of that I am alive and as healthy as I could be at my age.

              • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Humans themselves typically don’t feel their cerebellum shrinking or damaging. Others, who know you well, notice it way before you.

            • Malek061@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 days ago
              1. You are not much fun. 2. You have never been to a good party. 3. Humanity owes its existence to alcohol. Beer and wine were the only safe drinks before water purification.

              Alcohol also creates reproduction.

              You also will vomit when too much alcohol is consumed. Even if you are passed out.

              • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                Ask me how much alcohol and different drugs, including rarely known ones like 25l-nbome I’ve used. Medical field and drugs have always fascinated me, hence my excessive reading on it and the potential dangers associated with them. What I said isn’t also some hard-coded event that will most definitely happen, it’s actually mostly down to genetics where some will deal with said substances better than others. Look up super-hangover gene (forgot what was it called ironically)

                You all seem to be ignoring the “potentially” word from my original comment.

                • Malek061@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Potentially is doing too much heavy lifting. Everything can Potentially kill you. Excess water consumption kills you better than alcohol

                  Eating beef could Potentially kill you with brain parasites. Lettuce coils Potentially kill you with e coli.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          You can get permament drunk guy syndrome/brain damage (people who look drunk even when sober) from consuming too much in a short period (chugging like crazy),

          I have never heard of this in over half a century of drinking. Link or you made it up. Difficulty: no links to Mormon/religious nutcase made up shit.

            • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              I literally just entered your search terms and literally clicked search and, literally, I mean it, not figuratively, literally it responded:

              No results were found. Your search was processed without automatic term mapping because it retrieved zero results.

              I literally just copy/pasted that response here because I literally knew you are making shit up, you lying propagandist.

              Lying. Propagandist. Go back to handing out Chick tracts to people who toss them in the recycling bin.

    • Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      20 beers

      There’s no volume stated here… is 1 beer a pint, 0.5 liters, small bottle/can of .33 liters, 2 liter bottle.

      If it’s the the small bottle it’s not that much

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      If it’s like a once a year event, is it really that bad? It’s what I do for summer solstice. I don’t easily get drunk though. Maybe 15 beers an evening to get me drunk, so 30-40 for a weekend if I were to drink only beer and nothing stronger.

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Assuming 12oz beers at 5% ABV, that you’re a man at the global average weight of 180lbs, and have a healthy liver, if you paced yourself to 1 beer every 1.5 hours over the course of your 16 waking hours per day, your BAC would never exceed 0.02, you’d have 5-10 minutes between beers with a BAC of 0, and you’d drink about 12 beers in a day.

      Most people would not be noticeably intoxicated by this and probably wouldn’t experience any kind of hangover. They might wind up a bit dehydrated if that’s the only thing they drink. It’s also definitely not advisable to do that over any extended period of time.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            I think that’s just a rival company supposedly one-upping them, but that’s not a “real” pack, it’s just a pallet of 24-packs wrapped in a sign saying “1000-pack”.

            Cheers though I wasn’t aware of this before

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I remember watching the X-files sometimes in the noughties and Mulder came up with a deduction; “it must’ve been two men…nobody drinks two six-packs alone” and I just cracked up.

      12-pack was like a medium for the night, 24 a heavier. Plus bars usually. (Finn here.)

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        Also, alcoholics are real. My dad used to go through a 24 a day just to maintain. The liquor on top of that was to actually feel intoxicated.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah tbh, most people didn’t finish their beers, so only drank like 80% of a can they were everywhere, and usually people bum one or two.

          And unless we were at some festival, people wouldn’t have time to destroy 24 + bar drinks.

          But cruise ships? Three days of innumerable drinks of all sorts.

          I kinda miss that though. The adventure and friends, not drinking that much.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Perhaps the store was out of 12-packs.

          Also at that time, in like early 90’s (in the tv show), I don’t think 12-pack was that common

  • 474D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Get a 12 pack of beer and a medium sized nice liquor bottle as backup

  • EldenLord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Edit: Why would people downvote this? I actually want to know if anyone has an idea

    • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah this is the actual solution. With that said, I would be fucking stoked if I showed up to a friends house and they showered me with 100 beers.

  • Xulai@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 days ago

    I only upvoted for the Darmok reference and the actual photo still hasn’t loaded to see if the reference is valid.