Not really a meme meme, but i felt like i had to :s

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wonder how long this will last. The NSFW industry is insanely huge. If the current payment processors cut it off, that leaves a giant gap in the market just waiting to get filled (😏).

    If they hold firm on this, it might just be a rare opportunity for a new (and hopefully better) payment processor to enter the market.

    Or maybe just wider crypto adoption, idk.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Collective Shout happened, an australian organisation decided to wage global war on anything NSFW in games (so far), their key talking points are allegedly being feminist and anti-exploitation of women.

        i wonder if they asked the women they’re saying they’re protecting if they want that “protection”, or if they’re imagining that women just don’t make NSFW art

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Their (collective shout) open letter to these companies has a headline like “you are profiting from exploitation” basically, but worse. I guess the card networks were thinking about their stock price or something when they made the decision.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Time for Europe to get its own payment processor and stop being dependent on companies from Gilead.

      • _g_be@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        These conservatives are old, so they are trying to “conserve” ideals that were out of touch in their own time

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No. Conservatism has always only been about conserving aristocratic/oligarchic socio-economic power structures and establishing them where absent. Those are the only ideals they’ve ever had. All of the test was just a facade to pretend that their ideology has any place in a free, open, and equitable society.

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is why some of us love crypto currencies so much despite the hate it gets from so many who claim there is no intrinsic value, it’s a scam, etc.

    Stay away from shit coins, no doubt, but the intrinsic value is that you can side step all of the bullshit and spend your money as you choose. No need to get permission first. It’s looking to be a much better path forward, and payment processors inserting their own rules will only drive more acceptance of alternative payment methods.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean this is a false dichotomy. You can have a payment system that isn’t a shit show like crypto or a duopoly like Visa and Mastercard.

      • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        ??? Nothing about what I said was a dichotomy of any kind. Where did I exclude the possibility to create something else?

        All I did was use this situation to illustrate why crypto has value today.

  • niva@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t get it. Will they also ban sex shops, adult cinemas and every other offline adult entertainment thing that exist?

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Man. I remember being a kid and dreaming about a world where puritans got laughed out of existence. Then we had the “woke” era which shocked me sideways. I never dreamed that progressive thinking people would get hung up on regressive shit like policing language, it reminded me of being in church as a kid and hearing about those dreaded, awful, naughty words. But hey, at least their goals were well meaning and driven by empathy and concern for how other people have it in this world.

          Who did they piss off though? The fucking puritans. The very people who policed language all of my childhood. It turns out that nothing ever meant anything to them, they just wanted to control people. “Don’t tell me I can’t call a little person a midget! Bad words is fuck and shit! Not me making fun of people!!!” One group said, “if it’s fun it’s bad.” The other group said, “if anyone is hurt by it, it’s bad.”

          Now the puritans have gone full fascist because they felt like they were losing some culture war, so they want it all, and they scream loud enough to be heard.

          It’s like this tug of war that is just going to end with regular people who don’t raise hell when they get upset being shoved into the dirt by a loud crybaby minority of people.

          Before I had any grasp of history, I just assumed that people were always heading toward being more liberal in how they deal with the world.

          Nope, this is what we do. We have cycles of enlightenment and cycles of assholes responding to said enlightenment. Somebody always has to be morally superior, fighting some ugly enemy. If we ran out of reasons to fight tomorrow, we’d just argue over some other dumb shit.

          I’m drunk, so please don’t take me too seriously. I’ll probably wake up tomorrow and argue with myself about deleting this comment haha.

          Whatever happens, I really hope we have freedom at the end of the day. I don’t care what it costs. Maybe we aren’t meant to have it. Maybe our nature is just too ugly.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Imagine how many more “Thomas Matthew Crooks” are gonna come out of their basements if you ban their porn. Conservatives secretly love their porn. Might wanna rethink the ban.

    Or not, I don’t mind watching a IRL live movie about a rebellion instigated by…

    checks notes

    …banning porn 🤦‍♂️🤣

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    what even is the point of this cyberpunk dystopia if there won’t even be good porn to wank to?

  • bier@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    This comic goes from 2020 to 1984, was this comic originally about idiots that compared wearing a face mask to wearing a jew star?

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Worse, it was when Twitter banned Trump. This is just like when the Savage John asked to be exiled from the World State but the Controller forces him to engage in society to torture him.

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      There was a reddit sub where they take in unfunny comics (usually sexist) and then edit them to be funny. That’s how this actually became a meme.

    • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      cryptocurrency is absolutely not going to be a substitute. what happens when your client’s money drops in value halfway through working on their commission?

      • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or what happens when governments ban crypo exchanges?

        I think the real answer is for us (the electorate) to start electing officials who aren’t puritanical twats. Way way harder to do tough.

        • Tamo240@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Is this a serious question? Crypto is inherently decentralised and anonymous, from the base technology of the blockchain. The existence of crypto exchanges is directly opposed to its entire thesis as a digital currency, and only exist because people now treat it like a speculative asset and not like money.

          • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes it’s decentralized and very hard to stop to parties from making a crypto transaction. But what about cases where you need to convert your crypto to say euros because the person/business you need to pay doesn’t accept crypto? Don’t you need an exchange for that?

            How easy/ widely accepted is it to pay for things using crypto (gas, rent, mortgage etc.)?

            The point I was trying to make is that if paying for stuff in crypto isn’t ubiquitous, it’s far less practical as a form of currency.

            • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Not agreeing or disagreeing, but just a note that the alternstive to exchanges is peer to peer trading of cash/crypto where two individuals agree to swap. Obviously a lot more tedious and hard to do that, but with the right tools and mass adoption it could be feesible.

              If the government wants to ban crypto all together though, i doubt any solution could exist.

  • sprite0@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    i wonder if this is the shitgibbons in charge trying to drive up bitcoin prices seeing as how they just publicly bought a bunch of bitcoin.

    i know the payment processors have always been prudes but they are really doubling down and its only going to drive folks to crypto.

    edit: I don’t think it’s a good idea either but talk to anyone outside lemmy and ask if they understand the environmental impact of crypto and AI and they have no clue.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Bitcoin is really bad for using as currency, due to the fact that there is a permanent, public ledger of all transactions. Why would you want anyone you pay to be able to see and trace every transaction you’ve ever made? Pay rent in bitcoin, now your landlord can calculate your spending and who you do transactions with. And yes, there are services that aggregate and obfuscate transactions in order to make them less traceable, but now you’ve just reinvented the same centralized payment processor system that the whole thing is supposed to be replacing… so… what’s the point?

      Cash is good for using as currency.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        so… what’s the point?

        The point isn’t anonymity, but independence and autonomy. It’s hard to shut down and hard to tax. The banks/governments can’t freeze your bitcoins, nor can they simply print more or regulate the value otherwise.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          The banks/governments can’t freeze your bitcoins, nor can they simply print more or regulate the value otherwise.

          You’re just listing reasons why bitcoin sucks lol. Oh no!!! Flight risk criminals and terrorists had their accounts frozen!!! Oh no, ReGuLaTiOn BaD!!! Grow up.

          Finite currencies (like gold/silver/bitcoin) are deflationary currencies and are genuinely absolutely terrible for an economy. That’s why we don’t use gold anymore.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            “Flight risk criminals and terrorists had their accounts frozen!!!”

            Yes, those criminals, for example, LGBT people who conservatives believe are pornographic simply for existing. God forbid LGBT artists want to have a way of earning a living. Crypto is relied on by a lot of marginalized groups. It’s used by artists who make perfectly legal art, but whose content conservatives object to. Crypto is used by many queer content creators as they face being cut off from payment processing systems, as again, conservatives consider queer people pornographic simply for existing. Crypto is used by sex workers, often people with few other employment options. Oh, and crypto is used by trans people to get access to healthcare that is quickly being criminalized.

            How insane do you have to be, in 2025 Trump’s America, to fall back on the idea that anything criminal is bad. Republicans are trying to criminalize the existence of entire swathes of the population. And those people face being cut off from the banking system entirely, if folks like you, who blindly consider legality=morality, have their way.

            • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Ah yes, that’s why the Trump administration is one of the biggest proponents of crypto, right?? 🙄 did you even try?

              • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                How are those related? It is possible for some conservatives to want to purge LGBT voices from the internet at the same time other conservatives want to advance crypto. These are not mutually exclusive goals.

                • Zoot@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It does however look really bad that such a massive criminal organization (trump and co) are pushing for it so hard.

                  All of this before getting into just how insanely wasteful and terrible for the world that crypto is.

                  Sorry that it helps a few artists, but the cost for everyone else is significantly higher to embrace what crypto is.

          • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            It wasn’t my intention to come off as supporting it. I was simply giving the objective reasons for its creation. I see it as a tool that can be useful in some situations, but can be problematic in others.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Finite currencies (like gold/silver/bitcoin) are deflationary currencies and are genuinely absolutely terrible for an economy.

            Myth. Deflation is just negative inflation, and that’s been fine.

            • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              It’s a fact.

              Deflation is just negative inflation

              Yep, that’s a major problem. The total pool of currency needs to be able to grow with the economy. Take a first year econ course before speaking

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s a myth.

                The total pool of currency needs to be able to grow with the economy.

                Go on, back up that statement with references from your first year econ course notes.

                Under your model, how was the economy able to grow before 1976?

          • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            oh wow, it’s that easy? we should do it with other things like piracy, human trafficking, tax evasion, insider trading, bribery, cyberattacks and environmental violations as well. oh wait, we did? it didn’t stop it? i’m shocked. /s

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You can make intermediate wallets to obfuscate transfers, like throwaways, so the wallet that pays your rent is different from the one ordering a dragon dildo and it’s hard to say if it’s the same person, but it’s a hassle and you’ll get extra transaction fees.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s a bad argument. Visa, MasterCard, etc. know who you’re transacting with anyway. That is functionally equivalent to just paying from a Coinbase Bitcoin wallet. On the public ledger, it’ll only show a transaction from a Coinbase wallet. No one would know it’s you other than Coinbase and the porn provider

        Woth crypto you could at least send it to your wallet, throw it through Tornado Cash, then put it in another wallet, making it extremely difficult to track

        In general though, if the government wants to know who made a digital transaction, they’ll be able to find out. Doesn’t matter if you use a credit card or crypto

        What makes Bitcoin bad as a currency is the slow, expensive transaction times

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m cool with not trying the money that isn’t money but instead is an environmental disaster wrapped in explosive deflation.

      • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Looks like Bitcoin does indeed suck, but Etherium and one called Avalanche(?) Are more environmentally friendly.

            • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Deflation is not relevant for a transaction

              What are you trying to say with this? Cause I’m stuck between the very literal and wildly confusing.

              I will say, regardless of your further explanation, that deflation makes transactions less likely to happen, which is the whole point of a currency to begin with. Would you rather pay a debt to a friend off with dollars or a cryptocoin? Cause my money is that most people would say the dollars since the crypto could grow, whereas the dollar is always shrinking. A speculative asset is not something most people would give away like they would money.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                If you are storing money in a certain currency then inflation is a problem.

                If you owe money in a certain currency then deflation is a problem.

                If you are quickly moving money from one currency to another then making an instant one off payment, the time span is too small for either inflation or deflation to have an impact.

                The price of the service can be quoted as fixed in USD and adjusted in real time on the crypto side.

                • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Cool. So why would I ever want that? Why would I willingly buy a crypto to pay for a transaction when doing so is always detrimental to me over the person who I am paying? I’ll spend more than the amount of debt I have (thanks to various fees) in order to give the person I’m buying from an asset that’s more likely to gain value than lose. Instead of a dollar, a thing made to do the actual job of a currency that everyone already has and accepts.

    • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      If this really does drive people to crypto then I hope it goes to monero or a fork of it. Try blocking or tracking transactions then.

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      VISA and MasterCard get to build the digital dollar so they don’t care how any of it is manipulated so long as their position as middlemen is secure.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Probably simpler than all that, at least in the US. The Puritans get something like so passed. Fine. Now who in their right mind is going to stand up and say STOP. Imagine the political smear campaign. And it will all be “for the children”.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Let’s make a community run payment processor then. We’ll valiantly process porn payments.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      Having worked in the payment industry, there is a lot of work to be done.

      Even if you use the EMV standard, which almost all of the payment processor are based on, the challenge is to interface with the banks and making sure that every cards and terminals follow your standard.

      And that’s if you can convince banks to even accept you payment standard in the first place.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    So, this means that pretty much any paid adult content can’t accept visa, right? Or are they just stomping in the small creators for not being profitable enough?

    Looking at you, OnlyFans…

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      For now, they are targeting more niche “taboo” kinks like incest and bdsm. But as we’ve seen time and time again with bigoted, puritanical christofascists, they will not stop there. Next, they come for the queer content. My guess is furry stuff is next under the bad faith argument of “bestiality”, then more standard queer content, including tame non-erotic content. Finally, all erotic content.

      Remember, everything sexual is sinful and evil unless its a straight white cis Christian married couple having joyless missionary sex for the purposes of procreation only.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Valve has changed their content guidelines due to the requirements of the credit card processors. Itch.io, too. I wouldn’t call Valve niche.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      OnlyFans felt the pressure not too long ago. It’s just when they announced they were banning porn, they realized they didn’t have anything else. So they reversed course and somehow can still take payments.