Serious answers only. For over a year I was told that trump “doesn’t have anything to do with that”.

I honestly need to know from an actual Republican who believed trumps words and is now witnessing p2025 almost hit 50% completion with the department of education getting dismantled.

And with that; how do these people feel that public schools, daycare centers and tech schools all going to cost 3-6x as much as it does now for tuition?

  • sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    they’re not going to “snap out of it”. what he does for them isn’t the point. he could personally fire each and every Republican and fuck every one of their wives but as long as he’s a big tough guy triggering the libz, it’s all fine. this is just 21st century politics now.

    • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dang. At least in Black Mirror 21st century politics got to be shadow-ruled by an animated blue dog puppet, which took a modicum of the edge off the oppression.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I remember finding that episode annoying when it first came out.

        I watched it again after 2016, and boy did I view it differently.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Schools won’t cost 3-6x as much stupid LIBTARD! Schools will cost 3-6x as much and your Taxes will be Raised to pay for the CEOs Mansion STUPID COMMIE!

  • Letsdothisok@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know anything about it. What is it? I guess it’s got some good stuff in. But I wouldn’t endorse it. Whatever it is.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You were lied to, unfortunately. Project 2025 was always their plan, and as you’re seeing now, they’re going full steam ahead with it. The best thing you can do now is learn from this mistake. Don’t trust what politicians tell you they want, or tell you they’re doing; see for yourself what they’re actually doing.

    By the way, you’re going to get responses from like 95% leftists since it’s lemmy. Doesn’t mean they’re wrong though.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They don’t think Trump and Musk are doing anything wrong. When quizzed they’ll ask you to name anything they’ve done wrong.

    Everything Trump and Musk are doing is guised in Libertarian and Conservative values.So nothing wrong has been done on their eyes.

    If you go places like r/JordanPeterson (to ask) and r/Conservative to observe the media landscape - you’ll see that “The Woke” are wrong and have turned violent against Tesla. You’ll see Trump and Musk are thought of as doing great things.

    That’s how they think. They’re not in the same media landscape as everyone else is.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s how they think. They’re not in the same media landscape as everyone else is.

      This is literally the cause of all our issues. Fucking propagandists creating an alternate “reality” for Magoos to exist within where they are the good guys fighting the evil evil communist far left scum.

      I can blame a Magoo for being so susceptible to hate filled ppropaganda, but I really REALLY fucking despise the propagandists with every fiber of my being. If there were ever a group of people that deserved a firing squad it would be those like Sean Hannity who know exactly what they’re doing…

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        But they also think you’re in an alternative reality because of “leftist reactionaries” over blowing things in the media. Some of them would probably go as far to say that “We need anti-propaganda laws against the left wing media”

        …the problem for the left is, the right wing “alternative facts, alternative media landscape” is unfortunately MORE REAL in a legal sense because they own SCOTUS, and SCOTUS want to institute Unitary Executive theory… Which is what they’re doing.

        It’s a very clean sounding bunch of words for a kind of fascism.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s so funny that Republicans have found this magical loophole to excuse just about any action by just saying it’s woke. The second anything is called woke, it instantly must be destroyed and there’s no disputing it because it is just simply too woke. Shit at this point I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Trump said that zelensky and Ukraine has gone woke and they will send military aid to Russia to stop them

    • starlinguk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tell them research into women’s medical conditions (like endometrial cancer) is no longer allowed. I’d love to know how they’d spin that one as positive.

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is their spin isn’t designed to be positive or have mass appeal. It’s designed to create fervent followers who are desperate for something different and a sense they’re winning.

        In your example I believe the response for them would be something along the lines of “Good, women shouldn’t be getting special treatment anyways - END DEI !!!”

        • starlinguk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even though this means men are getting special treatment. Because research into prostrate cancer, for example, hasn’t been banned.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      When quizzed they’ll ask you to name anything they’ve done wrong.

      Why is this a thing? I’ve seen that so many times. “Oh yeah, well name Trump’s indictments” as if they got a trump card.

      And, well… uhh there’s a summary right here. What do they expect? Secret knowledge? As if pretending nobody knows that they are gives them leverage? I don’t understand.

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They’ll say a mix of “He’s clearly not guilty because nothing stuck! Teflon Don!” and “You shouldn’t go after politicians personal lives” and “Sucks for you he’s President now! You’re just a sore loser.”

        …that might make you mad, which they enjoy.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I asked my MAGA coworker whether he thought Trump broke the law in the hush money case, and his response was “she should have kept her trap shut”.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Project 2025 is the most double talky I’ve ever seen Donald Trump. “Project 2025? Nope, never seen it, never heard of anything in it, but it’s got some great ideas. I’m not going to follow it and I don’t have anything to do with it but I hear it has some really good ideas, but I won’t be adhering to them.”

    Reminds me of the “Unite The Right” rally where he wouldn’t really condemn anyone: “Those folks are really nasty, but also there’s a lot of good folks.”

    I think this is part of his “charm”. He double talks, so if you are a fan you perk up on the positives and let your eyes glass over during the bad parts.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      this was actually a key part of Hitler’s strategy. early on in the Nazi meetings they would try to pin down and give an exact agenda and set of policies.

      he would yell at everyone that they’re missing the point. it’s more about the vibe than the logic. being vague and ambiguous keeps your options open.

      “It is not truth that matters, but victory.” Adolph

      By refusing precise definitions, you are able to retroactively decide what the ideology “always meant”. so when it’s convenient to hate against health insurance CEOs you are “against the swamp”. when it’s convenient to dismantle the government you are “against the swamp”

      it can mean whatever you want it to. similar with the “enemies of the state”

      nazis would use the word marxists or “degenerates” very loosely. makes it very easy to shift blame to a specific target or another when necessary

      berlin’s degeneracy is because of gays, somewhere else it may be gypsies, another it’s the jews, etc.

      today we see phrases like “radical leftists” “cultural marxists” “woke ideology” etc

      a federal judge blocked some of Trump’s orders (Trump ignored it of course) and what does he call him? a radical left judge. something that couldn’t be further from the truth- radical left would imply some type of communist or socialist. but it doesn’t really matter because the term is vague enough it can work

  • 10001110101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know a couple life-long Republicans I sometimes briefly talk about politics with (one family, one acquaintance). Neither of them like Trump, but like the idea around Project 2025. One is an evangelical Christian, the other is a Catholic.

    The Catholic strongly believes government should be run like a business, and the president should be like a CEO, so he should be able to fire everyone and replace them, if needed, with workers that will execute his plans. He’s also an anti-abortion, and tough-on-crime/immigration type. However, he strongly disapproves of Trump seemingly being pro-Russian now, Trump and his cabinet’s personal lives (he’s always strangely fixated on people’s personal lives, in a moral sense, for some reason), the take-over of the FBI and CIA, and the tariffs hurting his stock portfolio.

    The evangelical Christian just doesn’t like Trump as a person, and doesn’t like Russia. He’s a just-world-hypothesis, small government, women are subservient, pro-business type; but also low/lower-middle-class, and has needed, and will need the social services he opposes. I guess his opinions are pretty similar to the Catholic’s, just a little more extreme on the social side, and supports policies that have always hurt him. I mean, Republican policies hurt the (fairly wealthy) Catholic too, but at least they get to say their taxes are lower and there’s less red-tape.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Government should be run like a business” sounds like a totalitarian religion.

      So basically the opposite of what the founding fathers wanted with separation of powers and checks and balances, right?

      I thought these people were cosplaying traditionalists.

      • 10001110101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, these people are ignorant of and don’t care about civics. The ignorance of the one guy surprised me, because they went to a decent college, but didn’t even know what gerrymandering was. They are un-american, IMO.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And this boys, girls, and the Eldritch entity in my cupboard is why the humanities are so important, if you want other examples go watch the Behind the Bastards episodes on the Zizians.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you want to understand them more, I think the problem is you’re seeing different aspects to what they do.

        ‘Large’ government with lots of power might sound more like totalitarianism, overseeing many aspects of life that - in the opinion of many - ought to be left to people’s freedom.

        Running the government like a business, on the other hand, implies having pressures on it to do only what achieves its aims, and do that efficiently. And a CEO-president means the power to fix the government without being restricted by bureaucracy.

        … Of course to me, by that point, it sounds like a king, exactly as you said. And running a government as a business sounds about as stupid as you can get. But these things aren’t exact, and understanding how a different perspective can make something look good helps us to understand the people with that perspective. It also helps us see things to improve that our perspective might be missing.

        • whereisk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But it’s not about the size of the government, or the bureaucracy, it’s about whether anyone can have dictatorial power over life, death, freedom etc of others without any check on the legality of their orders.

          The separation and co-equal branches of the 3 arms of government is bedrock. The government and bureaucracy can be huge or tiny without relevance to this.

          I understand the appeal of being unshackled by other people’s opinions and interests.

          I just don’t know how they reconcile their notional “conservatism” (they is conserving the traditions) with dismantling the actual tradition.

    • eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He thinks the president should hire/fire anyone they want, but they dislike the people the president has been choosing.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No offense but your personal experience does not characterize an entire religion. 2 people do not speak for 2 religions unless one of those people is the Pope.

      The reality is people often use the guise of religion as an excuse for them to act a certain way when in reality they are just bigots.

      • 10001110101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Didn’t mean to paint entire religions. It was just a convenient way to differentiate the 2 people I was talking about, and to imply where their motivations may come from. I’ve known plenty of less right-wing Catholics and Protestants. I am an anti-theist though, and think religion does more harm than good.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The person i was talking to about it said that he doesn’t want Project 2025 put in place, but also voted Trump and (as you said) said Trump “doesn’t have anything to do with that”.

    When I went to talk to them again after the election, he had either deleted his account or blocked me after I ask about Trump appointing many involved with Project 2025.

  • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The older ones are hearing stories of social security being canceled on people like them and they are getting nervous. My vehement Trump supporting co-workers are having trouble backing things he does. The cracks are small and slow but the confidence in their statements of support are getting weaker. I think some support is eroding, but it’s slow. It’s really going to have to affect them more directly for it to fully erode sadly. Though I think it will, the damage the right will inflict in the mean time will change this country for generations.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Trump knows that his supporters are going to turn on him eventually, which is why he’s working so hard to set up an infrastructure that can crush opposition without due process. He’s also testing the waters about ignoring court orders.

      If the supreme court lets him use the AEA then that means the president can use war-time statutes without Congress needing to declare a war, which means that he’ll be able to use a different statute to deploy the military on US territory. At that point, US democracy is officially over.

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait till they officially start calling for a constitutional amendments and they suddenly start losing some of their own rights. But by then who knows what it’s gonna look like.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can tell it’s hitting, every repub that was loud af about trump this trump that good idea this good idea that. The only thing I’ve heard lately is the CRT stuff that they just don’t understand because they’re unable to see anything from anyone else’s perspective and one of their buddies kids asked their parents about the racist comments they were making and if they were racist.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Like it’s their third rail of blow and their homie just picked up another ounce.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know any republicans personally but I would not be surprised if, given a choice between admitting fault and feeling bad, or literally any other option including lying or violence, they won’t admit fault. If they weren’t emotionally stunted, they wouldn’t be conservatives.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have literally stopped speaking to my parents over this and have put the ball in their court, telling them that all they need to do is re-evaluate their position about this one fucking guy and admit they were wrong.

      And I guess they’re fine with just not speaking to their son instead.

    • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Humans in general are very hesitant to admit that they were wrong. Cult members doubly so.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s so unfortunate too, because so many of our society’s current ills can literally be boiled down to “so and so refused to admit they were wrong”

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah I realized admitting fault is kind of a power move. You can just be like “oh! I was wrong. Woops” and what might have been a like hour long argument about some unimportant minutia instead just wraps up. Nothing bad happens.

    • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is why blaming conservatives or getting them to admit fault doesn’t work. It only makes them become more defensive and entrenched.

      A better approach is to appeal to their victim complex. IE: Instead of “Trump is ruining this country and its your fault for voting for him!” try “Dude, Trump is screwing us! This isn’t the great America we were promised!” or some variation of that. Gotta use different tactics.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, you have to make them see you as a member of a shared in-group. That’s the most important thing to them (and many people, honestly. we’re all susceptible to tribalism and such)

      • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure it’s possible to blame Trump rather than his voters when he literally promised to make most of these changes. It might be more effective to say that Trump was misled by Musk.

  • ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Please insert face in designated slot; the next available leopard will feast on it momentarily.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I appreciate you taking the time to write this post, and I appreciate you noticing this trend.

    But I’ve got to be honest: the writing was on the wall the whole time. Being in the Republican bubble doesn’t really change the fact that you only get here from a lack of critical thinking and a general susceptibility to propaganda. These are things that many people spend time and resources getting educated about. It’s hard to have sympathy when the whole country is now suffering because so many were so sure they knew better.

    If I sound angry, I am. I do hope you take it constructively, but you also need to understand: most of the damage has already been done. It doesn’t really matter how you feel from here on out, because the deed (from voters) is done.

  • sifr@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point, I don’t know why Republicans don’t outright just say they want people who they see as less than them suffering and/or dead. That’s their only consistent political view.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Studies show that people on the left are more trusting of others in general than those on the right. It is reflected in their obsession with guns and their rejection of social programs.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Leftist ideology is at its core about people. Even when it is wrong, it’s wrong trying to help people.

        The right is just about power. The only mistakes it makes are actions that cost it power.