• Martin@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yes, they are really cheap and the law (here in Sweden at least) requires all outdoor cats to be chipped. So the cat is probably already chipped anyway.

        • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          Even if for some reason you didn’t want to chip your cat (you should absolutely chip your cats and dogs) it would be trivial to just put a tiny receiver in something that dangles off their collar for the door to communicate with.

          • Dust0741@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Why should you? As a non-cat owner, I am curious about the privacy implecations of it. Also the benefits.

            • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              You store your contact information on the chip. Then, if your pet gets out and someone finds it they can take it to the vet to have the chip read. Then they can contact you and give you your pet back.

              You could, of course, have your contact details on their collar. But collars can come off or break. And if you’re worried about privacy, literally anyone can just read the tag on your pet’s collar. Most people aren’t going to have the equipment on hand to read a chip.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Personally don’t want to leave collars on my cats, I also don’t let them outside much though beyond our patio.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    A tag with proximity around the neck has to be the simpler and more cost effective solution. Thats just dumb tech bloat bs.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I think some guy did a HackaDay or Instructables about this a few years ago using Arduino. He got it to recognize his cat’s face to keep out other neighborhood cats. But to give the software enough time to recognize the face, the cat had to go through a 3-ft tunnel. Our cat door is built into the real door, so I can’t attach a tunnel to the outside. But our problem isn’t the wrong cats coming in. What I need is to detect if the cat has something in its mouth like a rat, which they love to bring in alive to play with and immediately lose so I have to root them out. Our cats are dumbasses.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      A few years ago I saw someone just simply checking for a cat head silhouette. Was enough to deter other animals and also worked to recognise if the cat had caught something.

      We have a cat flap that detects the RFID chip in her shoulder. It seems to be broken since a few weeks. But our cat (and not the stupid neighbour’s cat) can open it anyways with a little prying with her claw. But luckily that doesn’t work as well when she has an animal in her mouth. So we will probably leave it broken.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Silhouette sounds like an interesting method, although I’ve never tried to figure out how to test with and without rat in mouth. Probably would just have to try it in practice.

  • Mutterwitz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    If this could also prevent your cat from bringing in prey to your house, it would sell even better.

    Bird in mouth -> door keeps shut

  • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I wonder how long it will take the local racoons to figure out holding up a picture or video of the owner’s pet to the camera should suffice. Imagine that – racoons lying-in-wait, with stolen cellphone, trying to get something good.

  • nogooduser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    There’s not a chance in hell this is going to work to be able to differentiate between two black cats.

    We had two black cats and Google and Apple photos both get them mixed up despite them being easy to differentiate for us.

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Not to mention just how bad facial recognition is on two non-white people, let alone cats.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Cats from the same race tend to look very similar dont they?

    Anyway, this is more interesting than more chat robots.