• Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How does that work? I usually take 2 to 4 hours, how are all the other men supposed to fit in, in only 6 hours?

    Or is it literally sleeping? Because I’ve been to a 80.000 people festival, there have been several thousand sleeping at the same time I was sleeping, so my track record is better then hers.

  • Bunbury@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What are the chances that one of the first 50 or so people had some kind of STD and this is just a mass-spreader event? What are the chances that she now has permanently damaged her health?

    I’m fine with sex between consenting adults as long as it happens safely. I just don’t see how this could possibly have been safe. And even if (and that’s a big “if”) all of the participants got tested beforehand, what are the chances that the next person “inspired by” her will also do this safely?

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Typically professionals do ensure all their partners are tested beforehand.

      what are the chances that the next person “inspired by” her will also do this safely?

      Puritanical hand wringing. Tons of people have unsafe sex every day. If you want to lower STI spread, create public awareness campaigns and improve sex ed for students.

      • Bunbury@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I hope you’re right about the testing. Wish it said in the article. Also more sex ed is always a good idea.

        Sadly I don’t think you’re wrong about the puritanical bit. I didn’t think I was but the idea of this many sexual partners in this short a time does make me uncomfortable. Definitely gave me something to think about and maybe uncovered some bias worth working on.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Either she never read the book “Snuff” or she wanted to see if it would really happen…

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No its her stunt to make her job stand out and very clearly detrimental to her ability to do her job.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d castrate by steel toed boot any friend or acquaintance of mine that said they would be taking part in something like this, thought it was normal or wrote it off to personal choice.

    If you don’t understand this as morally bankrupt, exploitative and abusive, you need to review your values.

    • freeusething@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never gotten up to that number in a night, but I’ve gotten up to 30 or so. Planned it out as a birthday treat for myself. Something I wanted to do, because it was fun.

      Some people really do like sex.

      • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re just advertising. No better than any other company lying in internet comments to get people to click. Fuck off.

        • freeusething@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No? The quickest I block a guy is when they offer me money. I don’t have an OF and don’t want one. (If I took money, I’d feel pressured into doing things that I don’t like.)

          If I want clicks, it’s for my own… interests.

    • vomitaur@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      threatening unwanted physical harm against friends/acquaintences for any reason is morally bankrupt.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Let me concern about the outcome of my actions.

          Maybe you should “concern about” your ability to form coherent sentences

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Is my poor domain of the english that concerning to you? I’ll be losing my sleep, tonight.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, your inability to form a coherent thought was just easy to target. What I really don’t like about you is that you apparently don’t see women as independent human beings with their own thoughts and goals.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I am. And the very sad conclusion I’m forced to draw is that most people don’t care enough about others to prevent unnecessary and easily preventable suffering.

            Like the case at hand.

            The woman ended in a hospital. Maybe - just maybe! - the men participating in the stunt should had stopped for a fraction of a second to think if they were enabling and causing unnecessary suffering.

            Maybe.

            I might be wrong.

              • qyron@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Just because it’s legal, doesn’t make correct.

                The same way, many of the dangerous and/or disgusting things some individuals are into are considered a disturb.

                Following that, and remembering the spirit of my original reply, that by now has been removed, I would strongly - very strongly - disincentivize any friend or acquaintance if they told me they considered either taking part or were indifferent to the outcome of such a stunt. It would be one of those friendship ending situation.

                This is a calous indiference to human suffering and an easily preventable and avoidable one. And exploitation of it. Which is extremely sad. It is a telling sign of the times we live in.

  • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the third name I’ve seen with a sex with hundreds of men title in the last moth or so.

    In this a new trend??? In which case … I hate to be old school but wtf

    • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      i assure you that group sex is not a new trend. it predates agriculture, civilization, and humanity itself.

      those numbers would have been incredibly difficult to organize in the pre-internet era however.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is, and there’s a handful of people trying to one-up each other.

      With great financial success, I might add.

  • huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “I don’t understand why people have such an issue with it. These guys are just out here living life. They’ve been given an opportunity, and they’re like, ‘F*** it. Like, let’s just do it.’ They’re just having some fun. I think the people that are hating [are] probably just jealous, and their lives are really boring …I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”

    • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “…I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”

      I think that pretty much sums up a big part of America’s problem right there lol

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    OnlyFans star Annie Knight is sharing an update amid her recent hospitalization after sleeping with 583 men in six hours.

    It’s bizarre that US uses “sleeping with” to mean “had sex with”. Readers clearly understand, she uses the word “sex” in her quotes, but the magazine/site insists on using that bizarre euphemism.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t think that that’s very uncommon. When one “goes to the bathroom”, it’s understood that this is a euphemism for urinating or defecating, not just hanging out there.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed. It just seems like a weird editorial decision. Maybe it’s because I’m not a regular US reader, or I live in a different country, but it seems to slightly obfuscate what happened.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re looking way too deep into it. “Sleeping with someone” is such a common expression that nobody can possibly hope to obfuscate anything with it. Everybody knows they fucked. There will be no mistakes, no confusion. Besides, it’s not unusual for different contexts to use different phrases and expressions for the same thing. The press using a “softer” language is not a uniquely American thing by a long shot and it’s kinda weird to assume it would be.

          Not an American either btw.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You mean to tell me that when someone says that they’re taking a shit, it shouldn’t mean literally turd burgaling?

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      One fewer word/syllable.

      I think they should pare it down further though, and just say ‘fucking’

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jfc it’s just as bizarre as every other fucking cultures language on earth but I get it, it’s popular to shit on America while it’s fighting a civil war that was never declared. Easier than realizing this shit show is coming for you next.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not talking about the US, I’m talking about US Magazine. I’ve seen other US publications use “sex” to refer to sex.