• Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    The guy brags about how he has this magical influence over Putin, and “if he were in charge, none of this would be happening”…but when presented with an opportunity to prove that influence, Putin just says, “Nah, fuck that”, leaving Trump with no choice but to shrug and say, “Oh, well…I tried”.

    If you don’t find this pathetically hilarious, then you need to check your pulse.

    • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It’s funny that Trump believes he has leverage over Putin, yes.

      Your comment implied that Putin had leverage over Trump, which is equally false and hilarious. Sadly, the Western media has pushed that narrative to garner the most martial diplomatic stance possible in this Second Cold War.

      • Archangel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        My comment only implied that Putin holds the dominant role in their relationship. For all his tough talk, Trump goes as soft and submissive as a toothless puppy whenever Vlad enters the chat. Then he spends days gushing about how wonderful it was just to talk to him, regardless of the actual outcome. It’s like watching a 12 year old girl with a crush.

          • Archangel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I don’t think the Ukrainians would agree with your assertion that their desire for independence is based on a “liberal obsession with the personalities involved”. I know for a fact that if it was my country being invaded by a hostile neighbor, I would hope someone out there would help us fight back…and not just encourage my people to surrender.

            Would this have been your advice to the Vietnamese when the Americans invaded their country? On the surface, they didn’t stand much of a chance either…so why didn’t they just give up and let the US take what they wanted, in order to “save more lives”? Why would any country resist being invaded by a hostile foreign power? By this logic, the aggressor should always win…and no one would ever be safe.

              • Archangel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 days ago

                I know a lot of Ukrainians…many who were students at the time of the Maiden protests. It had nothing to do with the US. At all. They simply didn’t want their country taken over by Russia again.

                Prior to 2014, Ukraine was already moving away from Russian influence. The Yanukovych government actually represented a reversal of policy that went back over 2 decades, since Ukraine first declared its independence from Russia. Once he was ousted, Ukraine went back to the direction it had been heading, before he changed that course. That wasn’t a coup. It was the end of one.

                Putin never approved of Ukrainian independence. He was determined to prevent Ukraine from getting closer to Europe, by any means necessary…and Yanukovich was just another attempt to sabotage that relationship. When the Ukrainians realized who he was really working for, they took to the streets in protest.

                This wasn’t an attack on Russia, although it was an open rejection of their influence.

                And if you actually understood anything about Ukrainian history…you would know that the comparison to Vietnam’s history, is much closer than you’re willing to admit. Ukraine has been occupied by Russia for centuries. Treated as a vassal state, and subjected to horrendous abuses at the hands of the Russian Empire, and later the Soviet Union. The ruling class in Moscow has always viewed Ukrainians as peasants and lesser people.

                Why do you think they were so eager to be free, as soon as the Soviet Union collapsed?

                • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.netBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  Yeah based on your posting I’m not surprised you know Maidan participants and parrot their talking points. You’re describing the affects of western influence, and a common one at that, dividing a region into camps and luring one to work for the colonial powers against the regional interests. The imperialists empower some groups against others, and in this case they empowered literal white supremacists with the promise that they would become true blue europeans if they only sacrifice their neighbors, and themselves. To argue that a slavic nation is doing the right thing by getting pulled into a feud with it’s neighbors in order to join forces with the imperialist, colonial camp is again the most cracker take you can possibly have on the region.

                  The only people who wanted to be free from the the USSR were literal banderite fascists who were tired of having to hide their love of pogroms. The quality of life in Ukraine and all of the former Soviet Union plummeted and has never recovered. The best comparison of the Ukrainian leadership post 2014 in the Vietnam context is to the comprador catholic french speaking Vietnamese who hoped to exploit their own relatives to live it up with genocidal fascists and colonizers

                  • Archangel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    11 days ago

                    It’s pretty weird that you’re talking about Ukraine, while discounting the views of actual Ukrainians in your assessment. All you seem to know is what Ukraine looks like from a Russian perspective.

                    That says a lot.

              • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                Russia is breaking way more agreements than any other country.

                Yes, including the US.

            • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Ukraine’s 2014 coup d’etat brought US-backed fascists into power, which fractured the country into a civil war. The oblasts in the east and south sought independence in order to escape the ensuing ethnic persecution, but in response, fascist paramilitaries invaded the donbass and escalated it to violent ethnic cleansing. Eight years of attempted ceasefires were broken by the West[1] before Russia finally intervened.

              “8 Years Before” Donbass Documentary


              1. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/02/10/ukraine-zelensky-minsk-peace-russia/ ↩︎

              • Archangel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                What fractured the country into civil war, was Russia annexing Crimea during the Euromaidan revolt.

                • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  during the Euromaidan revolt

                  You understand the chronology.

                  BTW, even Western-based polling consistently showed the clear majority of Crimeans supported the referendum.

                  The war in the Donbass was also discrete from Crimea (where there was never armed conflict).

                  • Archangel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    That’s the thing with international law…you can hold a referendum if you want to, but it doesn’t mean you get to just give the land to someone else. The entire country needs to decide on that…not just one region.

                    If those people want to become Russian citizens, they have every right to apply for citizenship and move to Russia. No one is stopping them. But they don’t get to take the land with them. That land belongs to Ukraine. All of Ukraine. Taking it, without the rest of the country agreeing to let it go, typically results in civil war.

                    The problem however, is when foreign countries like Russia intervene in order to tip the scales and take that land for themselves. That is illegal. That is an act of aggression. It is an act of war. Not just civil war, but open war between nations.

                    Ukraine didn’t start that. They didn’t attack Russia. Russia attacked them. And then continued their effort to steal more land, by openly invading the country.

                  • Archangel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    Lol! Do you know how easy it is to find a few hundred racists willing to wave flags and yell obscenities in front of a camera? You can find people like that in Russia too.

                • Flyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Let’s be honest, they were hardly going to leave their nuclear submarine bases in the hands of a hostile government, were they…

                  • Archangel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    Ummm, yeah. You should recheck your dates. Crimea was invaded in February, 2014. Poroshenko didn’t take office until June, 2014.

              • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                You do know that you would be killed in Russia for showing your pronouns, right?

                So why do you keep simping for their propaganda?

                Ukraine has been sovereign since 1990. They are not a part of Russia anymore since then.

                So even if your fascism misinformation was correct, it still wouldn’t give Russia the right to invade.