- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmus.org/post/15293533
Article: Tesla Allegedly Disables Rapper’s Cybertruck After Song Critique.
If you hate Teslas that much, why do you own one?
It was praising the cyberfuck
I’m sure he’s REAL motivated to clean up his dis track in order to use a vehicle that was bad enough to warrant a dis track.
I’m not going to listen to it but apparently it isn’t a dis track, it is a load of wank about how rich he is that he can afford a Cybertruck.
Apparently the author also declined to listen to it, but they are a Journalist; it is their job to listen to it.
This is vital context. They didn’t disable his truck because he talked trash about it. He loves his Cybertruck. They disabled it because he’s black and dances around like a black person while he’s talking about it, and that means he’s not welcome at the party. If he was Tim Pool making a song about how much he loves his Cybertruck they’d have invited him to the next event to put it on stage.
It’s like these companies never remember the Streisand effect. I didn’t’t know who this rapper was before this, but I do now. Gonna go listen to this song too.
He should make another song where he tells the story, bashes the company and Elon, and showcase the truck being destroyed to bits!
From the king of “free speech.” 🙄
The fascist dictator at the helm remotely bricking customers $100k private vehicles will surely improve the brands image and sales performance!
Fake news
In any sane world that would be a trivial lawsuit to win
doubtful since a case would be in texas with the judge who owns tesla shares
That’s why they said sane
Don’t feel bad for dumbasses who bought Nazi cars.
I accidentally ended on threads.net trying to find lyrics to this song and failed. Didn’t sound like he was dissing the car though. Also, the letter may be fake because the signature doesn’t match LinkedIn.
The song is basically hyping how he’s so rich he’s got a Cybertruck.
Totally reasonable. I wish every electronic device would brick itself if it heard you talking shit about it. People are too rude to toasters.
Rude? No, no no, that’s a misunderstand. It’s call percussion maintenance SLAP
Hey, don’t judge. My toaster is into it!
“Alright Sparky, if you burn the toast again, it’s off to metal recycling for you!”
The clankers won’t spare you when the AI extermination starts.
Your wish would destroy the printers market
Theyre bricking themselves for free
HP are already doing that with the policy on bootleg ink and toner.
HP is a tax on people who don’t know about Brother
Cannot come quick enough.
I’m pretty sure my older hp printer heard me talking vaguely about my 3d printer that was being a pain and went on strike. “Printing Head not found”
Definitely real and not a marketing stunt.
Y’all believe some wild shit.
I am unsure how reminding people that the car can be remotely disabled is a good marketing stunt.
You don’t understand how a rapper whose thing is Tesla might benefit from him being in the center on controversy?
Big Huey
Marketing for the rapper, not for Tesla.
Until this; I’d never heard of that rapper, and this drove lots of people to at least find the song that supposedly led to the C&D/stranding(real or not).
This is purely nominative fair use.
If it was just plain old trademark/copyright law, you’d be right.
It sounds like Tesla are basically saying that you signed an NDA/non-disparagement clause when you bought the vehicle, and therefore it’s a contract dispute.
Doh.
And yet they just bricked his car and terminated any contract they had with the Artist, so… recording a sequel now!
I am sick and tired of the war on our property rights.
i don’t see that anywhere in the notice and such a clause would be unconscionable, IANAL.
All the notice claims is “violations of [ToS], including misuse of Tesla’s trademarks and brand identifiers in media content that falsely implies endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation with Tesla.”
ToS is effectively a contract.
This interpretation of the ToS could be deemed unconscionable, but that seems like the kind of argument that takes a judge and 5-6 figures in legal fees to settle.
An arbitrator is just going to read it, say ‘yup, you broke the rule’, and side with the company.
While not a “review” in the traditional sense, I hope it would fall under the CRFA anyway.
The Consumer Review Fairness Act makes it illegal for companies to include standardized provisions that threaten or penalize people for posting honest reviews.
They can’t necessarily use a “contract” as a defense.
I would hope so. CFRA seems to be the only explicit protection.
Not a Tesla fan, but this smells like manufactured controversy. The person who allegedly signed the letter has never held that position at Tesla, according to their linkedin
its most likely a lawyer on retainer
It’s most likely a dumb PR stunt from the rapper. At least a similar message displayed on the car screen was easily forged by a hackernews commenter, can’t imagine why a letter like this (with old title) wouldn’t be. We live in the age of LLMs.