• bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Popular and profitable things do way more damage no matter how “uncool” they are. Boomers making minion images will only worsen the problem.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I dont know why it upsets people. Maybe accept that it exists in the world and it only mimics real human creativity.

    If there was a fish that could mimic and recreate human art would you be mad at the fish?

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not to mention teachers (it steals our lessons and tutoring work), writers (it steals their work and rehashes it), musicians (music generation is a thing), programmers (so many code snippets, so few coding jobs), and many more.

      • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        And if the fish did just the same, putting artists out of work, would you be just as mad that the fish exsisted?

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Maybe if a fish was hooked up to a machine running terabytes (edit: actually, petabytes, probably) of stolen data through its brain, punishing it when it fails to produce similar results, until it can produce them… Then I would hate the people who did this to the fish, and the people who support them by using the fish to produce art.

          • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Its a fish, there are millions of them. You just get one and put it an aquarium in your house and they create these works through telepathy and telekinesis.

      • RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Plagiarism isn’t real except for capitalism and the machine of capitalist innovation has been eating jobs for as long as science has existed. If this is the reason someone is upset by AI, then I would ask why they were not mad at all the jobs that came before that had been consumed.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          There’s no option for me to choose a copyright-free world. But, I can choose to not use (or promote or propagate) works made by “AI” owned my MASSIVE corporations in violation of the copyrights of millions of independent, often non-profit-driven content creators (including myself).

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Exactly! The ‘death’ of facebook has in no way seemed to impact its influence on everything. I still find places that use a facebook page as their company website. The marketplace is inescapable if you want to buy or sell something used.

      All this idea would do is establish a very well known area for AI to be used in… and it would serve the same function as a reservoir of infection for pathogens.

      • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Or even local municipalities publishing important adivice.

        /hey did you know that they have to cut the water supply to work on these leaking pipes? /no /why not we put it on facebook /…

        No i don’t have facebook, O just wish people who used it understood this little fact of life. But no. They rely on facebook for local communication, essentially cutting out anyone else.

        • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That one freaking kills me. I can only hope that the movement of some places onto mastodon might help be a gentle push and a guide that can be pointed to for other places to follow.

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like it.

    It’s the “Use your kid’s slang to make them realize it’s garbage” reverse card.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    I feel like it usually minionizes anything it touches anyways, so that’s a surprisingly good fit for it.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I think that was every normal person’s experience with minions. They were funny as side characters in the film, but then the sequels and spinoffs leaned too heavily into them and the memes started and everyone with 2 braincells to rub together said “fuck this” and ignored the minion scurge to fester

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Too bad the supreme court put the dagger in artists backs for AI already. It would have been great if a company would license an artists source material to make a set of variations for a limited venue. Like a company licensing a voice actor’s samples, then they get to use AI to make those characters say whatever they want, in that one movie, or that one game, based on the license.

    As it is now, we’re going to end up with Spruce Lee fighting Hackie Chan movies, and none of the actors or their estates will get to say shit about it.