• 1 Post
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 25th, 2024

help-circle

  • hotel

    I think you mean “all-inclusive” resort (that isn’t all inclusive and actually charges a gazillion dollars in random fees) that makes them feel like they’re experiencing local culture while actually just experiencing the effects of the resort chain exploiting the local population for cheap labor while cheaply imitating the culture.

    Don’t worry, we Americans are definitely capable of escaping our cultural bubble! /s


  • Not only are their wages lower than their parents’ earnings when they were in their 20s and 30s, after adjusting for inflation, but they are also carrying larger student loan balances, many reports show.

    True, true. Surely they won’t try to both-sides this and make it seem like they’re overreacti-

    But by other measures, young adults are doing well.

    Oh no.

    Compared with their parents at this age, Gen Zers are more likely to have a college degree

    Because more jobs require them even when they’re not necessary. Also, see the crippling debt you just mentioned.

    and work full time.

    Yet still make less than their parents while working longer hours. How is this “doing well?”

    Plus, many millennials have more saved for retirement than they did just a few years ago, after reaping the benefits of positive market conditions.

    Fun fact, if you save money for retirement, it tends to go up, shocking.





  • The key difference is that these goods and services wouldn’t exist if you were not paid to do the job.

    If landlords didn’t exist, then all housing would either be government-distributed, socially-owned, or obtained through mortgages.

    If the workers building those houses didn’t exist, then the house wouldn’t either.

    The only difference between a system for housing with a landlord, and one without a landlord, is that the landlord is an intermediary that shaves some money off the top any time money is used to pay for housing, even when the building is already fully paid off, or they aren’t there, and your money just covers the cost of construction and maintenance directly.


  • Well, no, you’re funding the foundation itself, but to have the foundation let you pick to solely fund Firefox would require additional management and technical changes to actually make the accounting work the way it’s intended to, that probably just isn’t worth their time, given the small donor base.

    I’m sure if more people donated, they could actually be incentivized to make such an option available, but they barely get any donations compared to the revenue they make from the Google subsidy, so it’s just unreasonable to expect them to put in that additional effort, especially when the primary thing the vast majority of the money goes to is Firefox staff, development, and related server hosting anyways.



  • ArchRecord@lemm.eetoComic Strips@lemmy.world"Politics"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m genuinely not sure if I’m being too sensitive or if this is genuinely behavior that shouldn’t be supported.

    There’s nothing inherently wrong with that content existing, and being something people can pay for, but you’re also not being too sensitive for not personally wanting to pay that artist, if your surrounding circumstances would make the access to explicit content then seem a little unsavory in your particular case.

    Ideally, that artist would let you pay for just the non-NSFW content, or simply send a tip/donation directly, instead of requiring the NSFW content to be bundled with any attempt at payment, but that doesn’t mean that offering NSFW content itself “shouldn’t be supported,” even if it’s not desirable in your case.