The idea feels like sci-fi because you’re so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.
The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn’t been valid for decades.
It would make promoting new art and events downright difficult.
What’s wrong with making a societal shift where people learn to go out and look for what they want? It’s not like you can’t have a website with a schedule of all the activities for your ________. And if people want to see or do ________ they can come find out when and where instead of the constant barrage of shit they aren’t interested in anyway.
There are better ways.
And you know about this website how exactly?
Seriously advertisements have been used for thousands of years because they solve a very real problem namely how do you get people interested in the extra stuff you have?
Advertising has grown into a monster. It’s pervasive. You seem to be defending the concept a lot, do you work in advertising? maybe you have better ideas as to how it should change to better address the problem the article charges advertising with.
You realize searching the web can exist without ads or unfair pay structures … right??
Ok? How do you know about these websites if you only have word of mouth?
Unfair pay structures have nothing to do with this.
Are you sense? Just look them up lol
You must be in marketing. Go watch a Bill Hicks video, thanks.
No but I do have an education in history and economics which makes it hard to believe the claims of the people here or in this article
People can promote things they like.
That is called advertising.
Advertising is when they’re getting paid for it. Otherwise it’s called recommending.
Congratulations! You’ve just reinvented MLMs!
And paying people to suggest they buy something off the guy who has more stuff than they can sell by word of mouth has been our way of efficiently distributing goods for thousands of years. It’s almost as if it is solving an actual dilemma.
That’s not the kind of ad we meant.
So it’s almost as if we don’t want to ban all advertising as some versions of it are in fact useful?
If you want to split hairs, manipulative advertising is what people are talking about, and I’m sure you know that.
“The idea feels like sci-fi because you’re so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.”
The article itself contradicts that notion. I added italics to the bit that highlights this fact. They are literally talking about all ads.