Not defending Dementia Donny and either way I’m not shelling out $80 for a game ever, just wondering if this is really a result of the tariffs. I understand the console price being high due to them but I don’t see how it would affect the price of games that are essentially going to be 100% digital

  • meliante@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    I have a story. About 30 years ago Sonic & Knuckles was launched for Mega Drive. “I” bought that for 17.000$00 (Portuguese escudos). That roughly translates to 85€ without accounting for inflation.

    So although the price hike is unfortunate, I’m actually surprised the prices of the games remained stable for so long.

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    IIRC the price was announced first, and it’s the same in other countries so I don’t think that’s the reason. Which means that lets asume they will use Japan’s tariffs of 24% on them their base price goes from 80 to 99.2, plus in the USA prices are usually pre-tax so you also add tax on top of that, this varies from state to state, but a quick Google puts it at around 5%, so you will actually be paying $104.16 for them, and $117.18 for physical copies, or $126.63 if they’re manufactured in China and you get that tariff instead. This is just one example of what these isolationist policies will cause, be prepared to have that happen to everything.

  • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Nintendo just greedy, always have been, always will be. Don’t buy their trash, just emulate it.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I inherited a switch from someone who wasn’t using it and was blown away by the prices for the majority of games on it. They were charging AAA prices for Mario titles. If they had priced their Mario. Zelda titles at half the price, those things would have dominated before the SteamDeck’s came out. The switch is barely used.

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Vote with your wallet, and don’t let the FOMO pull you in.

    Nintendo is just a small slice of the gaming industry. If you don’t like what you see there are other platforms and game developers.

    For 80 usd you can buy a handful of bigger titles during a Steam sale. Just saying.

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The increased price is not the result of tariffs, neither for the games nor console. That’s pretty much confirmed by them costing the same amount (converted + sales tax) in Europe. The console is (was, before tariffs) fairly priced imo, it is comparable to the steam deck + dock.

    Is 80$ Mario Kart price gouging? Eh. The edit maniac in the comments here is right that video games have become cheap, maybe even too cheap, and that a price increase at some point was inevitable. 60$ was set as the AAA price before the smartphone existed, and was not always profitable as we’ve seen with the recent lay-offs.

    My own 2 cents: I’m glad some company broke that unspoken rule (we ignore skull and bones for obvious reasons), so big releases have more options in pricing, too long have we accepted 60$ games with 20$ DLC, I’m glad if this means devs can just charge 80$ for a full game. Oh, and it’s good for indie games too. People may actually buy the shorter games with worse graphics they wanted so badly a few months ago.

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Based on what little I know that goes into video game development, $80 seems cheap - assuming no mtx.

    But if it’s $80 + mtx? Fuck that.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m 100% sure that the next Fifa EA FC will cost €80 AND will have micro transactions AND people will buy it in millions of copies anyway

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Okay, here’s a slightly hot take.

    I’d rather the price go up and the games remain ad free and high quality (not you, pokemon, you can get fucked) than become enshittified with micro transactions, ads, etc

    I don’t like it. But it’s much more acceptable to me

    • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sorry bro, you get all of the above. Price go up, micro-transactions increase, more ads, and games get worse. We’re already seeing it happen, most games are overpriced and not even finished when they come out these days, and yeah, we are seeing ads in games now, especially sports games, and it seems Every game has to have a battlepass or some shit these days.

      You want good games without ads or micro BS? Buy indie, play old games, and wait for the AAA industry to collapse in on itself.

    • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Okay, here’s a slightly hot take.

      I’d rather the price go up and the games remain ad free and high quality (not you, pokemon, you can get fucked) than become enshittified with micro transactions, ads, etc

      I don’t like it. But it’s much more acceptable to me

      That’s absolutely a false dichotomy. In a world where games exist that are ad-free, high-quality and affordable, there’s absolutely no reason to believe any notion of high prices or in-game ads being a requirement for development. It’s just not true. Don’t fall for it.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Okay, fair enough. Just appreciating the lack of shit and (for something like an Animal Crossing or a BoTW quality Zelda game) I’m super happy to pay that much for a game I’ll sink hundreds of hours into, and I’d rather reward that price hike than any other form of monetization by them.

        I’m real enraged by like 99% of things on the internet and in the world these days, but this pales in comparison to the rapid pace of enshittification I feel like I’ve had in virtually every other place in my life.

        Still don’t love it.

  • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’d love to blame him but that seems like Nintendo’s choice. Yeah, I’m not fucking spending $80 on a game, especially when I have a gaming PC

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m always a few years behind on consoles and enjoy the robust secondary market, so to me, it doesn’t matter much.

    Outside of Zelda and Mario Kart, there isn’t much these days that’s exclusive to Nintendo that I give a damn about anyway.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is the problem with tariffs, it’s an opportunity for greedy corporations to increase prices MORE than the tariffs or on products not covered by the tariffs and no one will be the wiser.

    • JayGray91@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I doubt this is because of the recent tariffs. Nintendo is a cold calculating bastard of an old corpo they must have planned this for years.

      So my assumption this isn’t caused by that but just pure greed.

      No doubt they’ll jack up the price more because of orange fuckhead pissing to the wind

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Ocarina of Time cost $116.91 at launch, accounting for inflation.

    Edit: the original Legend of Zelda cost $144.89 at launch, also after inflation.

    • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yes, but only accounting for inflation really doesn’t tell the whole story compared to modern games. Games are primarily sold digitally now, meanwhile when OOT released all copies were physical cartridges - and that meant significantly higher cost of manufacturing and shipping. Also, games simply didn’t sell nearly as many copies back then as they do now. Being totally real, games don’t need to be more than $60 to turn a very very good profit.

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Games don’t cost 90$ today for other platforms tho… even Nintendo that are a few years old still cost basically the same as at launch

      • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They do. There are games on the PS5 store (digital ones) for more than 90 dollars. There are a few games I’ve seen upwards of 100 quid, which is about 130 dollars.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        True, sure. I’m just saying the overall price of games has gone down significantly over time. An upward correction makes some sense. I’m not cheering it on, just trying to help frame the circumstances.

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Competition for entertainment is higher than ever. You even have extremely good free games

          An upward increase makes sense only because corporations will try to squeeze every possible cent from consumer. That’s the only justification that they need

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well I’ve had essentially every console Nintendo has ever produced, but at least for now I’m not excited about the switch 2 for this very reason, I’m fairly put off about it.

    I’m either going to buy a steamdeck or wait for the cost to go down (Nintendo is usually firm with their pricing though) on the Switch 2 before I’ll ever buy it or any games.

    Especially while the US languishes under trump for the next nearly four years. I’m not going to have a lot of extra space for added expenses and price gouging.