Apparently I’m now a shitlib for not buying into this disgusting tankie propaganda that it was all the Wests fault and Stalin had to ally with Hitler.

For a mod who loves to ban others for bad jacketing, they sure have no problem doing it to other anarchists.

The Ban:

The Context:

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    The reason I am often pissed at the democrats is due to how bad they are at actually opposing the republicans.

    You’re just a ‘team blue’ maga type

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      You’re just a ‘team blue’ maga type

      What does that even mean? It’s sure not an explanation for how the public record of your actions (and oft expressed opinons) appears to wildly differ from the values you’re claiming to hold…

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        5 days ago

        What does ‘team blue’ maga mean?

        The guy I was responding to has in this very thread said:

        In response to criticism of ‘the west’: ‘you don’t like it? leave’

        Please move to russia or NK. You tankies enjoying western civ while shouting down at how evil we are, is rich.

        That’s like something I would unironically hear from a republican

        Upholding ‘western civilization’ because capitalism somehow lifts people out of poverty, again this could easily come from a maga republican, this person just happens to be on team blue.

        Western civ like it or not has pulled more people out of poverty than any other civ in human history

        For me ‘blue maga’ are the people who are western chauvinists but act like they’re above it all because they voted for ‘the good guys’ running the soul harvester.

        It’s sure not an explanation for how the public record of your actions (and oft expressed opinons) appears to wildly differ from the values you’re claiming to hold…

        Is being an anarchist somehow contingent on passing a geopolitical opinion litmus test? I organize with anarchists, I shit on the russian government all the fucking time for being a capitalist shithole. I shit on the US government all the fucking time for being a capitalist shithole. I happen to have ended up living in the US due to the various political upheavals in mine (and my parents) lifetimes. As a result I tend to criticize the US more directly as I am not a fan of my taxes getting turned into dead children abroad.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Lol you clearly don’t know me, scan through my posts and see if you think I’m blue maga or whatever the fuck. I fall more on the social libertarian side than anything else. I’m very critical of the dems, but I’m not also a fucking idiot who thinks that the fascist shit pile we currently have is somehow the same as the dems by any means. The dems haven’t gone full fascist… it’s pretty clear they’d also not be destroying the US or harming it’s allies…and would be supporting Ukraine. Something you clearly are against…so to me you’re a tankie who sides with maga and fascist.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        “Blue MAGA” is literally the singular best example of tankies parroting fascist rhetoric and is open evidence of their not so quiet collaboration. What a perfect parallel to the original topic of this thread!

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          “I’m not racist because Islam isn’t a race”

          Not to shine too bright a light on this, but you kinda have a habit of finding a single sentence that out-of-context supports your position and then jumping the gun by citing it. Did you read the immediately previous sentence, where they provide that quote as a clarification of their pro-palestine position and then go on to repeatedly defend Palestinian lives and decry the actions of Israel despite their (Palestinian) religion’s general stance on the LGBTQ+ or other political and social issues? Here:

          You don’t label a civilian death as a hate crime just because they’re a certain race or gender. So no you’re statement is blatantly false.

          Honestly I don’t know how well I’d get along with SupraMario (they were pretty islamaphobic a year ago and don’t seem to know what anarchists actually espouse) - but this is beside that issue: it’s aggravating as heck to see these comments. You’re clearly intelligent, but you’re just too eager to respond and it keeps making you look foolish. If you’d just slow down a little and get the context in which things are said, you’d be a much more persuasive advocate for your beliefs.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’m not an Islamaphobic, I’m just not naive to think that Islam isn’t less violent than other religions. I can support the people trapped under its weight, while still denouncing the religion…hell I feel that way against most religions because of how oppressive they are. This doesn’t make me somehow a religious-phobic of one religion, I just don’t like that people are naive of said religion because it’s being currently at war with itself and anyone that doesn’t agree with it, and tons of innocent people are dying under it. It doesn’t give it a pass.

            The Christian right is doing the same shit, sans the beheadings and stonings of women and LGBTQ+, here in the USA with removal of LGBTQ+/womens rights, and everyone is in agreement that it’s fucked up…yet the same people will defend islam???

            Please make that make sense.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I should say that after a review of your post history I’m quite sure we’d get along, I really only included that as an allusion to magnanimity. Religion is a difficult topic, all too often the discussion of any major trend amongst it is rebutted with specific examples of contrary behavior from a subset of the group. Maddening.

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            the original comment they responded to in that thread was this:

            Israel is probably the nr. 1 murderer of trans people in the world right now. Get your priorities straight.

            moving the goal posts to ‘hate crime’ doesn’t change that point.

            ‘Israel’ and its US accomplices are the #1 murderer of trans people in the world right now, statistically speaking, even if it is indirect.

            SupraMario can say that that israel ‘sucks’, but then redirecting to ‘but hamas,’ or ‘Islam in general bad’ doesn’t bolster that position. Maybe they actually don’t like seeing US taxes get turned into dead children, but considering how strongly they feel that the west is best I’m not holding out hope.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              moving the goal posts to ‘hate crime’ doesn’t change that point.

              This is like saying that Ukraine is slaughtering LGBTQ+ people because they’ve killed nearly 1/2 a million russian soldiers. You don’t label a civilian death as a hate crime just because they’re a certain race or gender.

              They are not claiming that there must be a hate crime for something to be valid, just that the initial comparison is inherently foolish, and they are elaborating their position by using hate crimes as an example. It’s a passable application of reductio ad absurdum.


              SupraMario can say that that israel ‘sucks’, but then redirecting to ‘but hamas,’ or ‘Islam in general bad’ doesn’t bolster that position.

              What Israel is doing is fucked, we should have stopped funding their damn military decades ago. What hamas and other jihadist are doing to people (women and LGBT persons mainly) in the middle east is also fucked. Both things can be true.

              They explicitly clarify that their position is the direct opposite of what you’re presenting it as.


              You’re doing it again, Diva.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                5 days ago

                You’re doing it again, Diva.

                doing what? they do the same to me every time they roll up to call me a tankie.

                the point was that the US and its Israeli proxy have the most dead trans people on their hands right now due to killing civilians indescriminately.

                I don’t see what the comparison to Russian soldiers gets you in that quote, you realize that a war is different from a genocide of a captive population, right?

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  The initial premise is that there’s been many trans deaths in Gaza. This is undeniable - that’s just statistics. According to Hamas, there’s been about 65,000 deaths in the genocide thus far. So it holds that there have been a horrifyingly large number of trans Palestinians killed.

                  The new premise as presented by SupraMario is that this is not the most deaths of trans people due to a conflict in the world right now, due to the war in Ukraine. The best count of confirmed deaths for Russian soldiers in Ukraine is around 80,000 (it is likely much higher, as their casualties are about 10x that number - but this is a very conservative measurement using only russian figures). By the same assumption as above, many of those 80,000 dead were trans. That’s just statistics.

                  80,000 is larger that 65,000

                  I’m not sure how the political situation leading to someone’s death changes their gender orientation.

                  I’m sorry, I don’t really know what to say beyond that. It’s pretty self explanatory.


                  doing what?

                  You’re seizing sentences entirely without care for the context and presenting them as evidence for your position. It reflects badly on your commitment to a good faith discussion, as it keeps happening, and has been repeatedly demonstrated.

                  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    there’s been about 65,000 deaths in the genocide thus far

                    That’s the amount they’ve been able to confirm and count, not including all the indirect deaths caused by the enforced famine and widespread destruction of all civil infrastructure, it’s in the hundreds of thousands.

                    it also feels like whataboutism, especially to have been bringing up military casualties in a peer conflict rather than a genocide of a captive population. Reducing them both ‘conflicts’ also kind of minimizes whats happening in Gaza.

                    It reflects badly on your commitment to a good faith discussion,

                    What good faith discussion? the one that started with people calling me a tankie?

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Says the person literally doing a “but Ukraine, Nazis” so russia ok to kill and take over Ukraine.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                5 days ago

                I’m actually opposed to all inter-capitalist conflicts. Ukraine may have a bunch of Nazi gangs running wild, but I don’t think it’s ‘ok’ to invade. It just gets more people killed and the situation spirals out of anyone’s control. I can understand the rationale, but there’s also other motivations.

                got any more thoughts to share about anarchists, or maybe thoughts about NATO destroying Libya or US invading Iraq?

                  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    Nazi gangs running around killing people with no prosecution is bad; a brave take I know. Invading to ‘stop’ them is also bad.

                    There’s plenty of reasons Russian capitalists go along with the invasion and it’s not because they’re opposed to nazis on principle.

                    How is this difficult to understand?

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yea that makes me racists because I’m not a hamas supporter while also not supporting Israel? Lol try harder.

          Islam is a violent religion that doesn’t support LGBTQ+ rights or womens rights…those are facts.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        the person I’m replying to said that I was a tankie for being insufficiently critical of Republicans, go talk to them if you have an issue with people being US-centric

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      You’re just a ‘team blue’ maga type

      If I search for “maga house”, “maga car”, “maga outfit”, I’m going to get some very specific images as a result.

      Please show me an example of this “blue maga” in image form.