• The “but alcohol is worse and its legal” crowd really rustles my jimmies in a bad way. I propose any reader to go trough every comment and post the best arguments for this being “fearmongering propaganda” under this reply.

        • Killer57@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Show me the studies proving that THC is even remotely close to as bad as alcohol for you, THC sure as shit isn’t going to kill your liver either!

          • You’d have differ between public harm and self harm. Also you miss the point, both can be bad in different ways. The links of THC use under 25 leading to psychosis and trigger/cause early onset of schizophrenia are more than established. I won’t choose between liver cirrhosis and mental health problems because both ruin your life. You don’t need organ failure rot in a clinic or become homeless with schizophrenia and off yourself. I’ve seen both substances ruin lives and my country of residence has infinitely better, and free, mental health care.

            • Killer57@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Please let me be as transparent as possible about this, I am a bud tender working in Canada, I sell legal cannabis to people right beside a liquor store. Cannabis has been legal up here for coming up on 10 years, and yet, I still haven’t seen any proof of what you are trying to say. So at the end of the day, please let the people who haven’t been allowed to research cannabis usage under prohibition research and report their findings.

              • sandwich.make(bathing_in_bismuth)@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I don’t think people with schizophrenia will still be visiting your store. I am pro legalisation of cannabis, but the possible consequences should not be dismissed as propaganda.

                For example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30373388/ (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6591882/)

                Now I agree that you could assert, in the case of depression and anxiety, these results could mean someone is self-medicating for said mental problems, thus clouding the objectivity. But that is not the case with psychosis. Not at all. That is entirely correlated to cannabis (and my personal research concludes this has to do with an increase trend of higher THC contents of strain in the past 30 years. A joint in 1995 is a hell of a lot different experience compared to today’s strains [yes I know there are strains focussing on CBD or other cannabinoids like CBG etc. But let’s not compare apples and oranges. Take a strain from 1995 and today, picked with the sole reason of getting high, and today’s strains will have a lot higher THC contents])

                Normally I dislike editorial pieces but this one refers to solid papers: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-link-between-cannabis-and-psychosis-in-teens-is-real/

                I don’t think anyone in cluster A or B (some specific diagnoses of cluster C maybe) should be near drugs. And especially THC, because of its image (its just weed, it doesn’t cause any harm). A lot of people self-medicate. I don’t want to create an illusion of there not being any precautions needed. People who use shouldn’t Russian roulette and find out if they are on cluster a or b, very likely increase early onset of symptoms or maybe even trigger something as permanent as schizophrenia. Even a single psychosis with no follow up episodes can fuck your life up good.

  • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I get that this is fear mongering propaganda but also, I kinda hate that you can’t buy any old school pot anymore.

    28% THC with no CBD just isn’t very enjoyable to me tbh.

    I miss that stuff that was like 18% THC and at least 0.5% CBD.

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      1.) It’s stupid easy to grow your own for next to nothing, in “stealth” containers ranging from 5gal buckets to full-on multi-plant gargants. (See: “space buckets” — and check your local laws)

      2.) It’s called weed for a reason. Set a reminder on your phone to water, prune, tend to your buddy. Spend as little or as much as you feel like, depending on how into the new, meditative hobby you’ve embarked on.

      3.) Realize you’ve been spending far too much on something you can set & (mostly) forget.

      4.) Enjoy!

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You can also just buy straight up CBD and mix until your hearts content.

      You don’t have to fill it to the brim with high grade pot if you don’t want to.

  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Willie Nelson looks great and sounds great for his age, with a case study like that I’m not putting down the cannabis

  • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is fear mongering disguised as “science”

    A population-based retrospective cohort study of 9.8 million people in Ontario, Canada, found that people with an emergency department visit for cannabis use or cannabis-induced psychosis were at a 14.3-fold and 241.6-fold higher risk of developing a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder within 3 years than the general population, respectively.4

    So another way to state this: people who are prone to mental health disorder are likely to LEARN ABOUT IT with cannabis, but it’s not causing healthy people to go crazy

    Some prohibitionist jumped on this to spin it as propaganda

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Copied from another reply:

      Schizophrenia is a mental health disorder that can be triggered by psychoactive substances, trauma, or other significant events/life changes. Not everyone who has schizophrenia was guaranteed to get it, it’s just that some people have the potential for it. A psychotic episode (whether substance-induced or organic) is a common trigger to cause schizophrenia in someone that had the potential to develop the disorder.

      If you have a family history of mental illnesses (particularly Schizophrenia and Bipolar disorder), significant THC use and substance-induced psychotic episodes can be the grain that tips the scale towards developing the disorder that may have otherwise been avoided.

      (TL;DR: if Schizophrenia runs in your family, be exceedingly careful about what psychoactive substances you use.)

    • misk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Some of us are more prone to mental health issues. Cannabis is a strong trigger. It is possible to go through life without triggers. THC is not something you need in your life unless prescribed for specific conditions.

      I’m all for full legalisation but legal age for most substances should be simply higher because it’s way too risky and damaging before your brain fully develops, as evidenced by the this paper.

            • misk@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              I’d rather add meta-comment in an effort to preserve quality of discussion. I’m seeing this everywhere - making a point by linking to a blog pretending to be a scientific paper. It has about as much value as a comment by anyone here. If I understand correctly it’s an attempt to add some kind of authority to your opinion but it’s just harmful to the way establishing truth works.

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                We’re talking on a casual forum. This isn’t an academic discussion. Blog posts are a lot more approachable than most journal articles. And blogs often contain references.

                Not everything is a formal academic debate. Most things aren’t. Note, you didn’t reply to the parent commenter demanding that they provide journal articles for their point. You just saw something you didn’t like about my comment and decided to demand a journal article as a citation. Usually when people who aren’t participating come into a discussion to demand peer-reviewed sources, it’s done in bad faith. They demand high quality sources from one side while not extending the same requirement to the other.

                Here’s another blog posts that address the original topic. You can look up the primary sources if you are so inclined.

                https://www.newhopecg.net/post/so-your-brain-actually-isn-t-fully-formed-at-25

                Or if you want to improve the quality of discussion, perhaps add your own sources instead of demanding others provide them.

                And note, even you don’t provide academic sources for your claims. You claim you’re seeing blog posts linked everywhere, but where is your journal article defending this claim? Where is your paper performing a statistical analysis to prove that people are citing blog posts more frequently than in the past?

                And I would argue that linking to a blog post is far from pointless. Blogs are less rigorous but far more approachable and digestible than journal articles. The real purpose of linking to them is so that a commenter doesn’t need to spend the time greatly elaborating a point that could be made simply by linking to a larger outside discussion. That has value. And a blog post certainly has more value than a random short Lemmy comment. At least if someone is taking the time to write a blog post dedicated to a single topic, it shows that they’ve put the time in to consider the subject.

      • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        So to be clear: because some unknown small sliver of the population may have an issue with it, you want to bubble wrap all of society?

        That sounds pretty conservative to me. Too much, even

        • misk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Where are you getting your numbers on % of population at risk of psychosis and schizophrenia to call them unknown small sliver? Cannabis being harmful to people under 25 is well studied. Most neurodivergent folk are at risk and both things compound enough so that having this kind of legal age just make sense.

          I consume plenty of weed myself but I’m for responsible and controlled use. I’m glad to piss off liberals and conservatives alike since I’m a leftie.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It sure sounds like they’re just saying that cannabis helped people detect schizophrenia earlier than they normally would have. Which would strike me as a good thing…

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Schizophrenia is a mental health disorder that can be triggered by psychoactive substances, trauma, or other significant events/life changes. Not everyone who has schizophrenia was guaranteed to get it, it’s just that some people have the potential for it. A psychotic episode (whether substance-induced or organic) is a common trigger to cause schizophrenia in someone that had the potential to develop the disorder.

        If you have a family history of mental illnesses (particularly Schizophrenia and Bipolar disorder), significant THC use and substance-induced psychotic episodes can be the grain that tips the scale towards developing the disorder that may have otherwise been avoided.

        (TL;DR: if Schizophrenia runs in your family, be exceedingly careful about what psychoactive substances you use.)

        • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yep. I had a close friend that accepted a grip of shrooms from some random chicks at a house party, only to find out the hard way that night that his estranged (since ~birth) father’s side of the family had a high risk for schizophrenia… Be careful, friends. Knowledge is power. Use your damn brains, please.

          • medgremlin@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I work in medicine (mostly emergency medicine), and I have seen a lot of people end up with their lives completely torn apart because of permanent effects of psychotropic drugs. CBD has a lot of benefits and some real clinical evidence backing it up, but there really aren’t any non-recreational uses for THC and the people who want to use marijuana for calming effects can get CBD on its own these days.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yall are sayin stuff like “learn about” and “detect” as if they got to just add that to their notes and continue on their day.

        Going from “might develop schizophrenia some day” to “inpatient for an episode right now” is a big difference.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Schizophrenia is better treated the earlier it is diagnosed. We are not talking about people who “might develop schizophrenia one day” but those who found out they had it as a result of this process perhaps earlier than they would have otherwise.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m not sure that finding out by having an episode triggered that results in hospitalization is a good thing.

  • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I was using pretty hard after my mom died. Numbing myself every night for two years, it really messed myself up and my partners life. After taking a break for 4 months I saw and felt what it was doing to me and decided to reduce and use a different form for more control if needed. I take a gummy on fridays and Saturdays now, finally found the best option for me and sticking to it for almost 7 months. Be safe everyone.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’re right, don’t mind the other commenters.

      With edibles or just strong weed, you can have heart palpitations that make you think you are dying. You aren’t actually going to, but it can feel that way when you are mega stoned.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Never really done any investigation then have you. You should hear about this thing called sugar.

      • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Sugar? What? I was talking about high dosages. Ever been so high you thought your heart was going to explode? That shit was terrifying.

        • purrtastic@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes. Had a few paramedic call outs due to THC causing tachycardia. Fucking scary. My heart rate was so high I couldn’t talk. Thankfully my heart was structurally and electrically OK.

        • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Making intelligent decisions when it comes to things you put inside you is a good starting point. It’s only easy to get “too high” if you’re ignorant… And if you’re doing drugs ignorantly ya dumb.

          Sugar can kill you unlike cannabis.

          • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            That is straight up stupid. Sugar is not a drug. It might be addicting, but it’s not a drug. It doesn’t alter perception or act as a stimulant or sedative.

            Sugar is in food. Added sugar can be bad for you. I’m talking about overdosing on THC. What the hell are you talking about?

            I said THC is harmless, but it’s scary when you get too high and you come in talking about sugar. I think you’re high.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Yes it does act as a stimulant as well as being an energy source. Also saying it’s not a drug is a bit silly when it directly affects and triggers systems in the brain that modify the chemical balance as well.

              • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Why does everyone suddenly want to argue about fucking sugar?! I never mentioned sugar. I’m not talking about sugar. What the fuck!?