Context

Alberta is a conservative Canadian province that is rich because they extract a lot of oil. The Alberta Government opposes all measures that could reduce oil-production or oil consumption.

For instance, when the Canadian Federal Government tried to take measures to reduce plastics pollution, the Alberta Government publically protested.

Calgary is the largest city in Alberta. The city has a traffic violence problem. Data shows it has the worse road deaths and injuries rate of any major Canadian city.

Jyoti Gondek, the Mayor of Calgary, recently suggested building more safe bike lanes to reduce car dependency. A few days later, her office received this warning letter

  • AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bike lanes doesn’t “decrease vehicle capacity”, quite the opposite. Maybe someone should explain what the word “vehicle” means to this dumb cunt.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can we stop putting actually infuriating political BS in the lighthearted c/mildlyinfuriating?

    • Rose56@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They won’t stop, lemmy now is 80% politics. Yet they complaining about dead niche communities.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          alwayshasbeen.jpg

          Life is politics, people enjoy trying to make this clean divisible line between “talking politics” and everything else but that line is non-existent.

          Politics touches everything we do and interact with. Literally name anything and there will be some sort of rules and laws around it that impact whatever the topic of discussion is.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Politicians sponsored by the fossil lobby are the norm, even outside pressure from USA (via ambassadors, state visits, bilateral agreements and extortions, or again lobbyists) is normal.

    It’s present all over Europe as well tho it’s (gotten?) weaker.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Paris evidence is right there for anyone to look at. Everything works, people get to where they need to be on time, AND the air toxicity has plummeted year on year. Excess and avaoidable deaths reduced.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s almost like being a conservative makes you a shitty and evil person and you fuck up wherever you are at.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    For Lemmings from other areas, it doesn’t read like a warning, exactly, but in the context of what the Alberta government has been doing it kind of is.

  • JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    They could use the inside lane of the four lanes on 4th Ave for a bike lane and a lot of their traffic problem would be gone without anyone missing anything. That would be constructive w/o construction tho.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wipe your ass with that.

    As demonstrated in Montreal, Toronto, Paris (France), Netherlands (pick any city), Berlin, San Francisco, and every other place that takes transportation seriously, you have to degrow car-centric infrastructure to build people moving infrastructure, including bike lanes.

    The growing urban population needs to find more sustainable ways to get around, because you can never satisfy car-centric infrastructure. “One more lane, bro” isn’t an actual solution to anything.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Let’s read this study about how adding more lanes and roads just makes more congestion, not less and how car alternatives are needed for the future of transportation to arrive. Like, oh I don’t know, Bike lanes and increased Public Transit infrastructure. Now, let’s throw it in the Garbage and go back to what we’ve been doing unsuccessfully for the past 75 years.

    • This Guy ☝️
  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I assume that it’s legal to ride a gasoline-fueled moped in the bike lane. Does this make everyone happy?

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    As if increasing bicycle throughput isn’t increasing vehicle throughput. They’re vehicles, and can probably achieve a higher passenger density than individual cars can on a city street.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      No ,no, the letter specifically singles out motor vehicles. Burning gas is the point. This letter has nothing to do with transporting people.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hope he crumpled it up, then reconsidered, uncrumpled, took the photo, and then presumably recrumpled it before throwing it away.