• chellewalker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Listen, the only way to protect women is to systematically harass trans-women. And the only way to systematically harass trans-women is to systematically harass all women. That’s just how to protect women! There’s literally no other way!

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why is it always the non-trans people making bathrooms unsafe.
    Wasn’t there a Walmart employee that was harassed in the ladies toilets because a customer thought they were trans?
    Where are the stories of trans people harassing non-trans people in bathrooms?
    …Or are trans people too busy trying to be themselves to even consider other people in the toilet?

    Also, why the fuck are gendered toilets still a thing?

  • Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Not the biggest issue but I feel like “pee in peace” isn’t necessary. People peeing aggressively and wanting to be seen is pretty rare. I feel like “in peace” should be assumed as default.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    could you change the post title to be article headline? i’d hate for this post to be removed for breaking rule 3

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is said quoted post:

      If you’re still buying wizard book shit, you are no friend to the trans community. Here’s the wizard book bigot inciting harassment against innocent people to her 14 million followers on the nazi app.

      And no, they can’t Always Tell.

      Concrete proposals made for UK public enforcement of washroom trans ban. Lgbtq visitors to UK please be aware and all trans people travel in pairs, avoid any known conflict sites and do not take direct action but withdraw and call police if harassed in washrooms.

      From twitter/X

      https://bsky.app/profile/shelleybwoke.bsky.social/post/3ls7m4vhsy22z

      I get why you would think said post was Rowling’s, though . It’s quite confusing how the article laid it out and it’s easy to miss that the embed logo changed from \mathbb X to Bluesky.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    She’s CORRECT! The ONLY way to stop Transgenders from Harassing Women in the Bathroom is for Cisgenders to Harass Women in the Bathroom!

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you still consume any media, purchase merchandise, or god forbid go to the themed areas of Universal Studios parks… you are fulling this bigotry. She is profiting from your consumption of a franchise and using that fame to attack women.

    I am heartbroken by what they have become. My childhood (and many other people’s) had that franchise throughout a big part of it. It has become shameful to say I was ever a fan. Nothing will redeem them. Nothing will make it okay to consume anything related to this franchise.

    If you openly wear/carry/own merchandise of any kind today, you are literally sporting symbols of hatred. Please stop doing that.

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    This entire article just feels like it’s written to say “oh, look at all these cis people who are harmed by this transphobia!”

    Well,

    what about the goddamn trans women being crushed underfoot by these regimes?

    • DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      And trans men, don’t forget about us!

      Real bloody fun to be arrested by police srripped and humiliated or run out by security guards or assaulted by patrons all while being treated like perverts for following idiot laws to the letter by peeing in the “correct” bathroom…

    • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think that the point is “Rowling claims to want to protect cis women but even cis women would be harmed if she got her way, so nobody actually benefits”. Maybe it’s too charitable an interpretation but then again maybe not.

      • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It isn’t just an interpretation, everyone going to the women’s bathroom, in order to use it, would be harmed. If only by fear of the fact of this eventually happening ( if she would get her way ).

        She is so full of hate, she doesn’t even seem to think further than “hurt them”. What a stupid idea.

    • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it’s always worth pointing out that this hurts even the people who she argued she’s protecting.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not just photographing. She said:

    Photographing, reporting and disseminating such men’s images online will be a piece of cake.

    So feel free to take pics of her peeing and post them online.