I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I’m going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.
T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can’t speak for another person’s intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.
I’m trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?
Call me Lenny/Leni/shinigamiookamiryuu is the “Triagonal” person.
The OP is lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
What am I lying about, exactly? There are links which prove the screenshots are unedited, if that’s what you mean.
deviantart.com/comments/18/2617047/4886760940
deviantart.com/comments/18/2612773/4879845792
Unedited does not mean contextually accurate.
Hello. I don’t think ShiverMeTimbers is participating in good faith and may be associated with the Triagonal person. They’ve also spammed the same exact message on the thread. They accused me of being two other people, and their proof was “you said you did but deleted the comment”. I only have 2 deleted comments on my entire profile and I undeleted them. They straight up lied about something I never said to spite me, thinking I wasn’t able to undelete comments (which proved I didn’t say what ShiverMeTimbers said I said): https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/22904406/13319893
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.