I have been banned from unpopularopinion for exposing person defending genocide and use of human shields by IDF.

One of the users in unpopularopinion thread was complaining about someone calling him a “fascist”

https://feddit.uk/comment/17531487

In response I did paste a screenshot of his comment claiming IDF are not using human shields, it is Hamas who do that:

https://feddit.uk/comment/17529782

… And the mod of unpopularopinion banned me. I can only guess he is a another genocide apologist.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the second thread OP linked, the user in question is sealioning and “ackshyually” all the way. The whole thing boils down to:

      • [Someone] Israel Defence Forces are using people as human shields
      • [Opinionhaver] Ackshyually, it doesn’t count as human shield
      • [Someone else] It does, see: [explains it]
      • [Opinionhaver] I dun unrurrstand you are point, explain again.

      They’re quacking like a duck and OP called them a duck. In this regard OP is right.

      • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll be honest, I was going off the evidence presented in this thread and didn’t follow the links. Dude is definitely a genocide denier and in the wrong but I don’t see the connection between being a hypocrite sealioning about Israel using human shields and being a fascist.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Denying that specific genocide is already grounds to call someone a fascist, because of why that genocide is happening: to expand an ethnostate in the Levant. So, when he showed surprise that he was being called a fascist, that was hypocrisy, because it was clear why.

          Sealioning refers to how he was debating in that thread, not the specific claims he defends.