• SatyrSack@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How so? On Lemmy, at least, they are absolutely not private. It is just a way for two users to communicate without cluttering up a thread or something. Not a way to communicate in secret.

    EDIT: Oh, I missed the joke. DM = Dick Move. Woosh

    • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s private in the sense that the DMs were made between 2 people. They are public in the sense that the admins of the instance(s) can read the DMs. Just like admins of any server can read anything that’s not encrypted at source.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        so… only admins can read the mail but the counterparty can’t disclose their own mail?

        wtf sort of logic does this rely on

          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Almost everything you said isn’t true. Point to the rule that says someone can’t disclose a DM they were part of? Unethical? Sure.

            And I mean everyone can disclose anything in their posession.

            It’s just not allowed

            Make up your mind.

            Also Drag is a troll. Has suggested that several people commit suicide. Drag doesn’t get a pass. Drag is a piece of shit. Don’t be Drag.

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                It depends on the state. My state is a one party state, meaning any person that is party to a private conversation can legally reveal everything in it to the public.

                  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    On paper, whistleblowers have federal protection from prosecution. In reality, however, if you blow the whistle on a rich person, a corporation, or the government, the government will go out of its way to punish you and make an example. See Edward Snowden, who is still wanted by the government, despite having revealed the government was engaged in what was then highly illegal espionage against their own citizens. The government responded by making that invasion of privacy legal.