Indeed, we should not. Thank you for saying this
Indeed, we should not. Thank you for saying this
Nothing wrong you say. Sure, noooothing can go wrong with this approach (I am looking at climate changes, fucking plastic in living organisms, wars not stopping even for a day, idiots in positions of power). Cool story bro, does not work
Lol. Navigating through menu-in-popup-in-window-in-tab-in-popup or adding/changing registry keys you understand nothing about is surely superior, right?
I was today years old when I realized that “just works” has nothing to do with the interface kind. If it works, it works, that’s it.
Then I offer my apologies for speaking too harshly. And thank you for another perspective on software, I did not think about shapes much before
Also, vim-like mode in IDE gives me a headache too :)
Tried, it irritates me. And nope, I never said my workflow is the best. I answered to your “wild” part. There is nothing wild in coding in vim. And yes, people proclaiming vim family is the greatest thing there is are no better than people proclaiming that only full-fledged IDE can get any job done
So I re-state the same n-th time over: I, and many other devs, have no need to draw anything. So I, and many other devs, will choose whatever works for us, and there is exactly nothing wild in doing so
It may be, but really it doesn’t even matter to me. I will choose the tool that can do that using command line anyway
It’s wild to me that people that people use VIM in professional software development settings
Ya, sure. wild that professional software development does not begin and end with 3d shapes. Great worldvew, thanks
Lol I am not making 3d shapes in the first place. Anyway, here ya go: 1,2,3
4,5,6
7,8,9
10,11,12
Do you need an explanation for that?
that is not VSCode default, so nah. once again: I have no time for battling against software
and if I do not want the GUI part, how come it surprises you that I do not use that superset?
You have overdone the pedantic part, so I will do the same: GUI has objectively way more visual noise, so exactly in professional software development setting I prefer using NeoVim with plugins, configured by me for my convenience, because I have no intention of spending any extra effort, and more importantly, thought, on whatever the IDE decided I must need. I want to think about the task at hand, not memorize the finger-twisting magical shortcuts or mouse-clicking several menu layers to do one damn simple thing
I like your optimism (really mean this)
And good luck to them (sarcasm)
So, not the programmers do this, lol?
A-ha, better languages my ass. They may make some specific job easier, but calling them good just because of that - nuh-uh. I would (and actually will) rather spend time learning to properly use C or C++
I dare assume you get downvoted for liking Rust, so take my upvote for balance. We differ about what we think of the language, but this kind of angry downvoting is plain ridiculous
I would say “why not, to each their own” if not the thought about what else the filemanager is going to do with root access (like downloading data from web for file preview). But the general sentiment still stands, it is absurd to think that computer must be used only in one way by all people
Well, fine with me. Closing one tab is no big deal, let the website die
Yes, I second this. QA has caught so many things that did not cross my mind, effectively saving everyone from many painful releases