Because she also drew some fury kink stuff as well. I don’t think that makes a difference as long as it isn’t part of any events or other stuff she does. But that’s not gonna stop the right from working themselves up. If there’s something else she’s done that I don’t know about that’s worse though please someone let me know.
you piqued my interest here so i went looking and found a tumblr post with a good summary:
Labelle has admitted to using a photograph of an actual child for “diaperfur” art, which is a type of fetish pornography (though she has done much to obfuscate this). You should not use people as references for art without their permission; you absolutely should not use children as references for fetish art. If any stage of producing fetish art requires using a child, it shouldn’t be made.
Never said I thought there was something wrong with it. I’m just saying that’s probably what the right wingers are saying. I’m friends with people who are furries and they are wonderful people.
Because she also drew some fury kink stuff as well. I don’t think that makes a difference as long as it isn’t part of any events or other stuff she does. But that’s not gonna stop the right from working themselves up. If there’s something else she’s done that I don’t know about that’s worse though please someone let me know.
you piqued my interest here so i went looking and found a tumblr post with a good summary:
full post: https://www.tumblr.com/deusexlachina/644386684936519680/in-light-of-sophie-labelles-sexual-misconduct
What the absolute fuck
There’s something wrong with furry kink?
It’s not my thing, but my experience in person at scifi cons is that furries are some of the best people in fandom.
Never said I thought there was something wrong with it. I’m just saying that’s probably what the right wingers are saying. I’m friends with people who are furries and they are wonderful people.