I really don’t get why so many people are turning this into a privacy versus anonymity debate when the real problem is censorship.

Yes, Signal needs a phone number to sign up, but replacing that with an email or username doesn’t make it anonymous. The real issue is that governments are blocking the registration SMS, so people can’t even sign up for the app in the first place.

Sure, there are workarounds, but most people aren’t going to jump through all those extra hoops just to use an app. If we want to spread privacy, how do we do that when Signal’s phone number requirement is actively working against us?

Instead of arguing over privacy versus anonymity, shouldn’t we focus on making sure everyone can access Signal without issues? What do you think?

  • monovergent 🛠️@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I credit a good part of my success bringing friends and family over to Signal to the fact that it emulates what ordinary people are used to: a centralized service where people’s identities are associated with phone numbers. No need to teach them anything new, just download it, punch in your number, and then punch in my number. I think Signal is targeting exactly that and putting more anonymous and decentralized models way on the back burner. Concepts as simple to us as ‘instances’ are surprisingly difficult to explain to newcomers, and I wouldn’t be surprised if accounts not associated with phone numbers pose a discoverability issue.

    This all might be sidestepping the question a bit since I haven’t dug deep into the issue, but my thinking is that Signal, in its current state, should be seen as a transitional solution until things like SimpleX become more mature and widespread.

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is a centrakized service.

      And yes, the familiarity makes it easy to get people to switch. The phone numbers made my contact discoverable so I had an easy way to find out they’re on signal.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Different people have different wants and needs.

    Your real problem might be censorship.

    But your uncensored messages are going to other people who might have a problem that’s not censorship. When you sent that message to your uncle last week about all the horrible things done around the world, and he gets stopped at the border to another country, and they used a certain unlocking software provided by another country with a really big intelligence service. Now his ass is waiting in lock up for agreeing with you on a message. His problem isn’t censorship.

    There are lots of ways to avoid censorship. There are very few to remain anonymous while you’re doing it.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    it’s been asked a lot and I’ve seen others respond about how the passcode and account username that were added in the last few years are steps in the process to make accounts not dependent on phone numbers. I’ve just given them the benefit of the doubt that someday we won’t be tied to a phone number anymore

  • Sailor88@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    We should be working to get more people to use XMPP rather than signal, Whatsapp, etc.

    • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yes but Signal is libre. If you’re already failing, stop making it harder. Get others to care first, then go for decentralisation.

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Signal is like TSA: it’s security theater. Any entity serious about security will not do these things that Signal is doing:

    • Hostility to non-Google appstores
    • Using phone numbers and SMS for signup
    • US-based entitity controlling the ecosystem
    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      So what messaging platform is actually serious about security per the points you have described?

      • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        SimpleX is promising, but seems very new.

        Telegram is better than Signal on many angles, but has other problems.

        I don’t think there is a perfect app yet. But Signal’s aggressive marketing is security-theater, not real security.

        • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Telegram as a platform is amazing. Feature rich while still easy to use. Easy to create useful bots too. Sadly the rest is questionable.

        • Lychee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Using SimpleX for some time now, can only recommend… only had an issue in France, though last time it just worked.