It bugs me when people say corporations enable people to take risks. They don’t. They eliminate risk. They allow people to do risky things without any personal accountability. Then they just shut down one corp, start another, and do it again.

Carice is a cool option.
An old school, no frills sports car, that happens to be all electric.

Sure, they’re hand built to order. But in that class, they’re surprising cheep. Less than €50K if I recall

You can manually setup any site to be your default search in Firefox.

Humans!

For the best results, keep both the soda and empty drinking glass in the refrigerator.

Then start with an empty glass tipped 15-20deg toward open can or bottle of soda.
Pour slowly onto upper inner edge of tipped glass. Stop with enough room in the glass for additional ice volume.
Place each cube into the surface of poured soda before releasing it.

If you’re insisting on ice first, use the other techniques but with a preloaded glass instead of empty.

Yes the idea isn’t, that they aren’t allowed to recommend anything. It’s that they can be held accountable (I.E. sued) if what they recommend, leads to people being radicalized by a hate group, or attempting suicide from cyber bullying. Or even just extra tharapy from doom scrolling ourselves to sleep. Right now Section 230 says they can’t be held liable for anything on their sites. Which is obviously stupid.

Those were my edits, they didn’t use both

On one hand the Judge is right. On the other hand the lawyer is right. Then on two more hands, they’re both wrong.

Yes, it’s bad to legislate by moral panic. Yes, kids are addicted to social media. Those are both facts.

The reason age gating is a bad idea isn’t because of moral panic, or “the children”. It’s because we’re ALL addicted to social media. It isn’t just the kids, it’s adults as well. The problem is the intentionally addicting algorithms, meticulously engendered to keep us scrolling. I’m telling you in 50 years, we’ll know how all the social media companies were hiding and lying, about the addictive harmful nature of their business; Just like we know about tobacco and oil companies today.

The best solution I can think of, is to revisit Section 230. You can’t hold these companies responsible for what people post to their sites, but we can and must hold them accountable, for what they recommend! If you have a simple easily definable sorting or ranking system of what people choose to follow? You’re fine, no accountability for something bad showing up. If you have some black box algorithm of infinite scrolling, based on a complex criteria that nobody can really break down and explain exactly why a specific post was shown to a specific individual? Now you’re on the hook for what they see.

Judge Uses D&D’s Failure To Make Him Worship Satan, To School Teach Florida On About Social Media Moral Panics.

I think that’s what they’re trying to say

I think your questions are more complicated than you realize.

Are Autocracies more powerful than Democracies?

If you separate the form of government from the governing, yes autocracy is a superior form of government. A dictator can instantly marshal resources to face any threat, or completely shift an entire nation, if a direction becomes clearly wrong. The reason they don’t work, is because the leader is always human. Humans make shit leaders, almost always. So distribution of power across a large number of people mitigates the risks of putting it all in one.

Are all democracies are doomed to fail?

Yes. Obviously. Everything eventually fails. The Sun will fail and take the earth with it.

Is the future of humanity, autocracy? For the rest of humanity’s existence?

No. Obviously. Everything eventually fails. The Sun will fail and take the earth with it. I would hope humanity (or whatever species humanity evolves to) lives past that.

I just call it a “Pull Cart”.
Or “Cart” for short.

It’s a pattern.
I know it seems strange from the anti-cancel-culture contingent of society, but it’s a real thing.

Sometimes people don’t pay attention to the community a post is in.

There is a difference between probably backdored, and we’re not event trying to look secure anymore.

So get a warrant.

In that specific regard, probably.
I use Fennec. I’ve found the more security minded versions, tend to have problems with some site or another, and annoy me.

If I remember, that setting is extremely aggressive, and breaks lots of sites. Firefox has by default, a more complicated and nuanced feature that works practically as well, without breaking everything.

I assume mostly, because the free stuff doesn’t have a marketing budget.