You can caveat it with their perspective all you want, that’s an aditional statement that has nothing to do with the original perfectly valid, perfectly understandable statement that you understood.
It’s normal for both Americans and Finns. But that’s kinda duh, you spoke about they who find it normal so of course they would be people who find it normal.
I mean, I know what you’re saying because… you know, but if we’re going to do this dick measuring thing you’re going to at least have to approximate language.
You can find it abnormal but it still is normal to Finns. It doesn’t change the actual reality. That’s just what it means.
You can caveat it with their perspective all you want, that’s an aditional statement that has nothing to do with the original perfectly valid, perfectly understandable statement that you understood.
You said “they” though.
Finns and Americans are both “they”. Everybody who isn’t you or me is they.
Keep it up, we’ll descend all the way down to pure formal logic this way. Breaking new frontiers of semiotics, I tell you.
It’s normal for both Americans and Finns. But that’s kinda duh, you spoke about they who find it normal so of course they would be people who find it normal.
That is not a sentence.
I mean, I know what you’re saying because… you know, but if we’re going to do this dick measuring thing you’re going to at least have to approximate language.
I’m sorry but what do you mean?
That’s my exact question, actually.
You don’t know what you meant?