You’ve seen instances of quadruple amputees, people losing their lower half and instestines, etc. After playing a bit of Deus Ex I started wondering exactly how much of a person needs to exist for them to survive (not talking quality of life, but just enough to communicate intelligently). How far could you do it with only natural parts and then how far could you go with artificial parts too?

  • deadcatbounce@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There are a great many politicians who only appear to be the arsehole (with no other redeeming features) and remain alive.

  • Berttheduck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It really depends what you mean by survive.

    You could do ECMO and dialysis and get rid of the heart, lungs and kidneys, parenteral nutrition to feed via an IV so no need for a gut.

    The patient would be bed bound and at immediate risk of dying from a complication but in theory that’s basically an empty abdominal cavity connected to a brain and a bunch of machines.

    You would need enough decent sized blood vessels left to connect it all up but otherwise not much physically.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s basically exactly what I was getting at. So theoretically, at least with machines, you would only need your head to survive.

      • Berttheduck@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maybe, you’d want to talk to someone like an intensive care doctor really but yeah a lot of your organs can be replaced mechanically these days at least for a while.

        • ell1e@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Can they really replace the liver and the kidney long term? That would be news to me.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            On constant dialysis that you never get unhooked from, I don’t see why not.

            If you can just pipe nutrient-rich blood into the brain directly you can probably bypass the entire digestive system. That takes care of the liver, and with the only waste products coming from the body being whatever the brain produces, that should be a pretty light workload for an artificial kidney.

            • ell1e@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I think dialysis damages the blood from what a web search suggests to me, so I doubt that would work non-stop.

  • ell1e@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I like science fiction so I find this interesting. I’m not qualified to answer, but while the skull is probably needed, probably not eyes and nose and jaw 🫥 right? And beyond that just neck to connect things and to swallow liquid food, and some parts of the torso. I guess the question then remains how much of the torso.

  • sharkfinsoup@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The book Johnny Got His Gun kind of answers this question. In the book, a WWI soldier gets blown up by an artillery shell and wakes up in a hospital missing most of his body. He has lost his arms, legs, nose, mouth, eyes, and ears.

    In the end he learns he can communicate with a nurse by tapping his head in Morse code. So it would seem as long as you could move you head with your neck, you can still communicate with others.