• tburkhol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Think of it as a profitability index rather than a diligence index, and it will make more sense.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      It will also be wrong.

      The only credit lines I have and have had for the last 7 years (which is as far back as the bureaus care, at maximum) are credit cards. I pay them off every month, so I’m charged zero interest, and they’re rewards cards, so their profit off me is literally negative.

      My credit score is over 800.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your ‘reward’ is less than the transaction fee they charge the vendors. You use your cards a lot, they make a lot of transaction fees. As long as you never miss a payment, you won’t get the interest fee, but miss or be late with just one, any they will charge you interest on the full balance, every month, until you have a $0 statement. That’s fantastic for them, but they’re perfectly profitable on just your transactions.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Your ‘reward’ is less than the transaction fee they charge the vendors.

          And that has literally nothing to do with customers’ credit scores/reports, and my point was to rebut the assertion that credit scores are intended to be measurements of how ‘profitable’ a borrower is, so it’s meaningless to bring up this irrelevant fact I already knew.