Now do it with 200 gigs of mods. I would love to know how stable Skyrim is with mods under proton.
i don’t run 200, but I run 58. i play on a steam deck and I use MO2 as my mod manager of choice!
runs just fine. i only get dropped fps in some dwemer ruins, but honestly? that might not be the modlist, that could be stock skyrim. lol.
How does MO2 work in proton? Is it one proton runtime that runs MO2 which then somehow launches another proton runtime to run the game? I can’t picture how it could be done
i run MO2 through Proton (also you should install protontricks if you don’t have it. it helps with additional wine dependencies that may be needed)
then I use MO2 to launch SKSE modded version of the skyrim SE launcher.
Vanilla skyrim runs perfectly with proton kinda on its own, so MO2 doesn’t really have to do anything except make sure all the plugins get loaded in the proper order.
MO2 is quite nice, actually. i use it to run the normal Bethesda skyrim.exe if I want to configure my base game settings (graphics etc) but then just exit and swap back to the SKSE launcher from MO2 and we’re golden.
I also find that CreationKit seems to play a lot more nicely when launched through MO2 than if I add it to steam and try to manually run it myself with Proton (CreationKit sucks to run, however and you’ll have to get used to crashes and losing all progress so I would only recommend using it for very small tweaks.)
but yeah! runs just fine in proton. you really only need MO2 to initially launch skse for you. then it just kinda chills while you’re playing. but the software is good (though I will say there was a bit of a learning curve in my case as I am a Vortex refugee 😅)
Interesting, sounds easier than I thought! Thanks!
200 gigs… ? what. the. fuck.
That’s about the avg size of most mod packs on wabbajack!
I’ve tried several lists over the years. The now defunct Thuldor’s Skyrim, and my current Tempus Maledictum list, both experienced the same issue. They get installed and run just fine, but i’m about 60% of the fps short, compared to Windows. I suspect it’s because of the vram overhead, and io bottlenecks in wine
I’ve noticed stuttering issues in modded Empire War, but I also run heavily modded Stalker just fine with 60-70 FPS. Wine is a fickle beast.
That was my general worry, i never got around to really testing it tho. Unfortunate to hear i wasn’t too far off on the IO bottleneck problem.
There are some lists that are designed specifically to run with Proton and/or on the Deck, claiming solid 40-60 fps on the Deck, so i’d take a look at what’s available in Wabbajack. In my case, i’ve definitely expected more framerate, but i can’t really complain here, because this list is really heavy in most aspects. 100% worth playing though
I’m in the process of doing that rn, probably not 200gigs but just enough to feel different from vanilla
Oh it’s the best. I can run just about any game now between proton, wine and other Linux tools for gaming like lutris or play-on-Linux. Gaming on Linux has come a long way.
I booted windows on a 2012 MacBook Pro with a 650m gpu and that computer got HOT!
I know it’s been 13 years, but it doesn’t feel that long and now a phone can probably run that game no problem.
Mind sharing your specs?
It’s Ryzen 5 4600h and Gtx 1660ti
Oh, I’d have loved to have that gpu back in the day.
If your laptop has more than 2 cores/2 threads and has integrated graphics better than HD 6xx it is not low end.
Its a 1660Ti, so really not a low end laptop lmao
To be honest I’d be surprised if it didn’t. I ran the OG version on a 2011 MacBook air with Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics. On HD 4000 it actually ran quite well.
I was playing Nine Sols for quite a little while yesterday, and when I switched away for something I discovered that NixOS had decided to rebuild the kernel when I did an update and I hadn’t noticed. It was sitting there with the load at 18, all the cores pegged in the red, just happily playing the game for me as normal the whole time.
Nine Sols is not some kind of graphical powerhouse but still I was pretty impressed.
On a 1660 Ti (MaxQ, I presume)? I can believe it. It’s the exact range of game that card is made for. At a glance I don’t see Skyrim AE benchmarks, but notebookcheck has it running Monster Hunter World, MGS V and Rise of the Tomb Raider maxed out at 1080p60ish.
Maybe I’m spoiled by just assuming Windows and Linux benchmarks are comparable by default? I guess it’s no longer a surprise now, so… congrats, everybody?
Also, man, is there something you can do about those CPU temps? It makes me nervous just to look at that 28% utilization at 90C. I’ve been away from gaming laptops since handhelds are a thing and I’m not used to that anymore.
at that 28% utilization at 90C
It’s probably all single threaded. Overall CPU usage isn’t very useful in the day and age of 8-24 core CPUs. Especially hybrid architectures like Intel has.
Sure, and with the GPU sucking up a bunch of juice that’s plenty to get toasty.
It’s just I haven’t been using laptops that do that in the past few years and coming from desktop world it feels so wrong now.
Skyrim is a pretty well optimized game, so this is not really that surprising.
Nice!
Mine probably can’t run Skyrim, but I’m surprised what my 8yo laptop w/ a Ryzen APU can still run.
Im playing it on my steamdeck. Ugh just lost a thrall and could not find shadowmere for awhile after the soul cairn. I really wish the thrall spell would just set the thrall to the max level of the spell rather than fail due to auto leveling thing.
