• JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate this argument. The term America has been used to refer to the US for so long now that it’s colloquially the same.

      The term “USian” is just as bad as “American” if you really give a fuck about the names of countries because the USA is not the only “United States” they could be part of either. If you’re gonna try to find a word that is instantly recognizable as “citizen of the United States of America” why not just use the one that literally billions of people already use every day?

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          How about we call them “Union Members” seeing as they’re part of “the Union” as decreed by their founding fathers? Instead of bulldozing over all of the other “United States” in America and the world by replacing the imperialist “American” with the… Somehow less imperialist “United States Ian”?

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        why not just use the one that literally billions of people already use every day

        Estadounidense?

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you’re speaking Spanish, and that’s the colloquial term in your region, yes. That’s exactly how linguistics work.