• JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate this argument. The term America has been used to refer to the US for so long now that it’s colloquially the same.

    The term “USian” is just as bad as “American” if you really give a fuck about the names of countries because the USA is not the only “United States” they could be part of either. If you’re gonna try to find a word that is instantly recognizable as “citizen of the United States of America” why not just use the one that literally billions of people already use every day?

      • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        How about we call them “Union Members” seeing as they’re part of “the Union” as decreed by their founding fathers? Instead of bulldozing over all of the other “United States” in America and the world by replacing the imperialist “American” with the… Somehow less imperialist “United States Ian”?

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      why not just use the one that literally billions of people already use every day

      Estadounidense?

      • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you’re speaking Spanish, and that’s the colloquial term in your region, yes. That’s exactly how linguistics work.