• Apeman42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because it’s one thing to not shame ignorance, and quite another to entertain people who are being deliberately obtuse.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It’s certainly reasonable to offer a charitable interpretation of the question, rather than assume mal-intent.

        “What would it take for an AI to be given governance over the world?”

        • Toes♀@ani.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah that’s pretty much what I was going for.

          Kinda surprised about the downvotes but glad people came out to comment about it anyways.