I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I’m going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.
T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can’t speak for another person’s intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.
I’m trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?
I don’t see anything there which says I have two lemmy.wtf alts.
Because they’re deleted, duh.
My thread was locked, so I deleted the thread along with the comment replies. Either point me to where I said what you think I said, or go somewhere else.
I did.
No, you pointed to deleted comments in a thread about art and tried to say I said something I never said, using only the fact the comments were deleted as a means of making things up.
I just undeleted the comments. (Thanks Lemmy). I suggest you now delete the comments accusing me of saying anything else.
You straight up lied in this thread to everyone. I’m not going to reply to you any further.
Sure, just as long as I get to accuse you of false accusations of art theft, based on those screenshots (which further prove you just came here to slander the poor girl). Those images you accuse her of stealing were traded to her via art trade, she went into detail about that some time ago.
I wasn’t accusing anyone of anything, I was asking if the person was an art thief, not saying they are one.
You straight up lied in this thread to everyone and you call me a liar? I’m not going to reply to you any further. Have a good day/evening/night.
Then you admit the accusations of her being an art thief are just speculation?