I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I’m going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.
T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can’t speak for another person’s intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.
I’m trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?
You could if you knew the OP was lying about several things and taking other things out of context, which was their whole point in coming to Lemmy and ban evading twice when they got caught the first two times.
What do you mean by lying? I checked out the description of the video and there’s links which prove the screenshots I posted here are legitimate.
deviantart.com/comments/18/2617047/4886760940
deviantart.com/comments/18/2612773/4879845792
Textually legitimate, contextually legitimate, or subtextually legitimate?
These are all different. Plus you actually have to prove their ages and their local legal ages for it to even begin to be legally binding.