I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I’m going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.
T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can’t speak for another person’s intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.
I’m trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?
Yeah noncery is afoot, Triagonal is acting like a creepy crawly cradle-robber
As I explained, there is way more to it than just the perspective of someone you met today.
Get a job, weirdo lol
You calling people out as a form of jest almost seems indicative of trolling.
Hello. I don’t think ShiverMeTimbers is participating in good faith and may be associated with the Triagonal person. They’ve also spammed the same exact message on the thread. They accused me of being two other people, and their proof was “you said you did but deleted the comment”. I only have 2 deleted comments on my entire profile and I undeleted them. They straight up lied about something I never said to spite me, thinking I wasn’t able to undelete comments (which proved I didn’t say what ShiverMeTimbers said I said): https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/22904406/13319893
Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.
So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.
Why would I be aware? I have a life outside the internet
Call me Lenny/Leni/shinigamiookamiryuu is the “Triagonal” person.
The point being that doesn’t square well with the original verdict.
Shut up lol
I can’t point out conflicts of interest?
I just don’t even really understand what you’re saying mate - an adult is creepily trying to get with a child in the screenshots, and you’re talking about something else. What are you trying to say?
Call me Lenny/Leni is the “Triagonal” person making comments to the child in the screenshots. Click on Call me Lenny/Leni’s profile and there’s a link to the Triagonal account in the bio.
That there is more to the context than what you see (not to mention it happened years ago with any amends that needed to be made having been made, the kind of thing pictures wouldn’t show) and that the person you initially were responding to who is trying to spread around the claims “about Triagonal” has been a part of an ongoing harassment/stalking/slandering campaign against the people they’re referring to, which is what I was alluding to.
The last two pictures portray things that took place in response to other things. The other person in the first one only got upset because she was recommending something far more NSFW and someone missed a beat when a second thing was suggested which didn’t have any inherently non-platonic-related undertones. Same with the picture after it. Everyone was throwing loose answers out there in response to a joke thread about an art phenomenon, and there was only one pairing not taken up.
The first picture’s vagueness aside, it’s amazing anyone takes someone’s word for plain grey text on a plain white backdrop that portrays something you’d expect to be impossible if the individual doing it is banned from that place for whatever reason they got banned for. It’s the equivalent of accusing someone of writing their own name on a bathroom wall when the accused person has been dead for a month. Is gullibility just the modus operandi for fediverse revolutionaries?