• shice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    If I remember correctly, the spherical design was mainly created to resemble a baseball. Since most US citizens knew how to throw a baseball at the time it would mean they didn’t have to train soldiers as much

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That is a myth. The spherical form is to maximize surface area to volume for shrapnel, ensuring that no matter how it lands. Shrapnel will go in all directions.

      • Rusty@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s definitely a myth. Soviet WW-2 grenades like RGD-5 and F-1 are also spherical and baseball was unknown at that time in USSR.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s also wayyy more cost effective when you’re transporting them. For the Allies, because they relied so heavily on supply lines every cubic foot of space on a ship or truck was important. Carrying a grenade on a stick to the front means not carrying three more grenades. I’m sure four grenades are more lethal than one grenade that a soldier might be able to throw a little bit further.