• tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      22 hours ago

      What people really want is to not have to change anything - neither about their lives, nor about themselves.

      They want to live in a perpetual 2005 where Windows is forever usable and still just an operating system. Where they feel happy and comfortable in their environment and their skills and abilities.

      And I get that, because I feel it too.

      But sometimes you have to change yourself, in order to change your world.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I mean if you’re dead set on it you can get a lot of modern things running on windows xp, chromium browsers, dx10/11 games, discord, etc. it’s a nightmare and you’ll have a ton of headaches (especially with the dx10/11 stuff, apparently, I’ve never tried any of this) but it’s possible

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I mean to be clear I don’t do it. The only computer I run xp on is an old tektronik mainframe that only has lan access and needs proprietary software to work that only runs on xp

            I don’t really count that though since i literally only use it for the one app that allows the logic analyzer and oscilloscope cards to work

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          There are also hacked/modified XP builds floating around based off the source code leaks that backport some of the modern Windows OS features.

          Still not an “easy” experience though.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Please use different formatting for emphasis and non-speech. I recommend escaping the asterisks with backslashes for the latter.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            The way you wrote it, there is no formatting distinction between emphasis (nonbinary) and stage directions (laugh track). I suggest you use something else for one of these, preferably the latter:

            u might even say its a nonbinary choice *laugh track*

            u might even say its a nonbinary choice [laugh track]

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Except for… context? I’m constantly annoyed by grammar/spelling online and even I say you’re going too far.