• nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If humans weren’t greedy dicks then capitalism or any other form of government would work perfectly. You can’t force humans to not be greedy dicks. No matter what system is being instituted it is susceptible to greedy dicks.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      capitalism or any other form of government

      But capitalism isn’t a form of government tho.
      Nor is communism of even feudalism.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Our entire schtick is co operation, it’s literally why we’re the dominant life form

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Your generalization is false

      The majority of humanity are not greedy or obsessed with profit

      The problem is that the few ridiculously greedy sociopaths that do arise per-capita are just so FUCKDAMN good at amassing power and wealth that we assume it’s the natural lot of all people

      So we just test and dispose of sociopaths at birth, problem solved. We already have the tests for it.

      Don’t look at me like that

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yep, which is why we need to use nontraditional power tactics like leveraging drones and cyber attacks as well as flashmob tactics and social media control

          Money buys you a private army but not loyalty, we need to start early and get idealists positioned in those private armies

          Make inroads with the children of billionaires tired of their parents’ excesses, this was a valuable vector during the French Revolution that almost no one talks about

          More than anything we need to accept the fact that no amount of signs or shouts are going to stop the ultra wealthy from destroying everything for more imaginary numbers in an already unspendable bank account

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It’s still objectively eugenics to target people based on genetic conditions, especially if the genetic condition has a not wholly undesirable result.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yes we can, via laws & regulation (which are also laws). You have no clue about what unrestricted greed does to people especially, on the recieving end

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yes if you don’t enforce it, but you don’t want to enforce it now, do you. You love greed until you are on the receiving end

          • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            You can’t even understand your own mother and here you are making bold assumptions about the personal values of someone you met on the internet half an hour ago. Fucking classic reddit right there man

            Greed is the source of nearly all human misery and it is not necessary for life at all, and I have personally witnessed what it has done to people

            I do not love greed in any form and the fact you just stated that with such effortless confidence tells me our society really isn’t worth saving.

            And now these statements, despite being only minor glimpses into my value system will of course immediately fill you with ten thousand assumptions as to who I am or what I think.

            That’s mental illness friend

            • Senal@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              <Complaint about bold assumptions of individuals values>

              < Bold assumption about all of humanity >

              <Assertion of personal perspective>

              <Further complaints about assumptions>

              <Name calling/Labelling>

                • Senal@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Dammit, missed the code tags

                  @page "/lemmy-reply"
                  @using HypocrisyManifest
                  
                  <p>Complaint about bold assumptions of individuals values</p>
                  <p style="font-weight:bold">Bold assumption about all of humanity</p>
                  <p>Assertion of personal perspective</p>
                  <p>Further complaints about assumptions</p>
                  <p>Name calling/Labelling</p>
                  
            • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Are you familiar with anti-trust laws ? Anti-corruption laws ?

              According to you they shouldn’t exist, because a crafty psychopath will get in anyway & yes you do love being greedy as long as it benefits you, why else would you be defending capitalism.

              Socialism HAS been tried & it works. You see I want everyone to get welfare, because with it you can have a safety net against the abusive owner-class. BTW, I’ve never been on reddit (I don’t even have a twitter account)

              • Senal@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                So I’ll be upfront and say i don’t know shit about socialism as a concept.

                Do you have any examples of socialism that has worked (or is currently working) at modern nation scales ?

                I’m genuinely not picking a fight, just looking for examples to read up on.

                • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Cuba, Laos, Vietnam & the state of Kerala in India. China too (but they shifted to state-capitalism). Most of Latin America were electing socialist leaders as well. (Until some coup came along)

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Which ones? Which ones don’t damage their land or steal children from enemies or rape or steal? Please don’t try to say any indigenous tribes because they are all guilty of one or more these.

        • RockBottom@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Any indigenous tribe. But seriously it was not long ago that no professional fishermen anywhere would ever overfish.

          • Ridgetop18@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Only because they weren’t capable of it lmao.

            There’s at least some evidence supporting human driven extinctions as far back as some of the earliest ‘modern’ (ie Homo sapien) hominid populations.

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            this is only true to the smallest of extents, there were plenty that had those behaviors, survivorship bias is not a good footing for an argument.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Survivorship bias is so important to remember when talking about human societies. Even our perceptions and knowledge of indigenous tribes is limited by survivorship bias. Consider that there may have been many more “peaceful” or “non-greedy” tribes, but they were conquered by groups of people that were more violent and selfish. There must be so many tribes that have been wiped away without a trace, tribes we know nothing about.

              But the real barrier to this hypothetical “non-greedy population” idea is the matter of scale. A peaceful village of 100 people is easier to create and maintain than a peaceful global population of 8+ billion. Even if indigenous villages managed to build such utopias where greed doesn’t exist, their models wouldn’t easily scale to the world we live in now.