You must log in or register to comment.
That SVT kind of fucks
I don’t hate it.
Bullpupperest AUG.
Is there a Bullpuppy? Does it want cuddles?
The kriss has a really interesting internal mechanism. Worth a glance if you’re into guns. I got to try it once and nothing feels like it.
I’m assuming you only got to fire it semi-auto. I’ve heard the two round burst on non-civilian models is extremely uncanny feeling.
2rb actually, at a place in Las Vegas. The guy next to me was literally firing a mini-gun.
Ooh nice. Of course it was in Las Vegas lmao. That seems very on-brand for minigunning.
Doesn’t it have some kind of counter balance system so it recoils downward? Or do I have that backwards? I saw something about it years ago and it was indeed interesting.
Yeah the recoil goes down at a ~45° angle so you get weirdly little muzzle rise. It was uncanny.
I would very much like to see someone try to fire the Bullpup SVT.
they’re good dogs bront
So from a mechanics standpoint what are the pros/cons of a bullpup design? off the top of my head I’m guessing more barrel length but less space for any kind of recoil supression?
Pros: Longer barrel in the same overall size, or a shorter total length for the same barrel. A longer barrel means more exit velocity, while a shorter weapon means more agility in small spaces (indoors, for example).
Cons: the ejection port is close to the shooter’s face, making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible. The chamber is also closer, making it more dangerous in the (relatively rare) case of a catastrophic failure.
the ejection port is close to the shooter’s face, making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible
Keltec RDB
Keltec RFB
Springfield Hellion
DesertTech WLVRN
… I probably missed some, but there are many bullpup rifles that are swappable between left sided and right sided ejection ports, and swappable mag release, charging handle, bolt catch, safety selectors… or have some other solution to this problem.
Not exactly nearly impossible.
I would add in as a detriment of bullpups… that their internals are generally more complex, and properly identifying the cause of a failure to fire, and fixing it, while under stress, is often more difficult, and general maintenance tends toward being more time consuming as well.
Also: generally notorious for requiring a lot more foot lbs of force to pull the trigger, and that trigger pull is ‘crunchier’.
making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible
Kel-tec calls bullshit
Hot brass bukkake is the price you have to pay.
making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible
Angry FAMAS noises
well, it’s not strictly ambidextrous but it’s allegedly pretty easy to change the side of the ejectionB-but the FN P90 is ambidextrous and ejects the casings downwards.
The FN P90 is weird no matter how you look at it.
It’s safer to look at it from the rear I believe.
Hard to scale that particular design up to longer cartridges, unfortunately. A 5.56 P90 would be so cool, though.
The Keltec RDB has bottom eject and fires 5.56
Ckr even more noncredibility, the Keltec RFB is a bullpup with forward eject.
This is how the RDB rendered on my mobile browser:
we need wide zelensky with stout rdb rofl
Two projectiles for the price of one?! Count me in.
Borderlands ass gun lmao
Keltec just can’t stop making cool shit
Cons
Also generally a more complex mechanism, with the associated negative effects on reliability, cost, or both
Also weird ergonomic issues and a different manual of arms. Those can both be trained around, but that’s a big ask for most militaries.
Hinterschaftlader
