• hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Seriously. Why the fuck would I want a machine that draws for me? What’s next, a machine that pets cats and laughs at jokes so that I can use all my energy towards making profit for our overlords?

  • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is the thing I really don’t understand about the AI crowd. I would be so much more supportive of companies like openai if they they were pursuing the automation of the dull tasks nobody wants to do, rather than flagrantly breaking copyright laws (the same ones that have been weaponised against normal folks) to create a pale imitation of human creativity.

    Like, shit. I want a machine that will do my taxes and fold my laundry so that I have more time to pursue artistic endeavors.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    As someone who mothertongues a language that reads “ä” as “eh”, I’ve always been calling that thing “heh’aagen-dasz” and because of that I’ll never buy it. It could be delicious, yet I refuse to support this kind of usage.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I’ve never seen anyone say they should ban traditional art and only have AI?

    What a well constructed strawman.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s not a perfect analogy because no one is paid to eat ice cream. People do get paid to produce art, and that allows a lot of people to pursue their passion while still being able to house and feed themselves. Automating art and making it cheaper than humans means they would no longer be able to do that. We’ve automated away jobs that people actually enjoy doing. It’s not banning per se, but it greatly reduces how much time people can spend on it.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Right but people who like art can still make art, which is what the comic is implying they can’t.

        Is this about creativity or capitalism?

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          If you’re wealthy enough, you can. Otherwise, all your time is going to be spent working (not through producing art) to make ends meet and resting so you can do it all over again the next day.

      • Micromot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I know what AI is and have developed a simple one myself before. I have also used ai and I still think it shouldn’t be used to automate away interesting jobs

      • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The neo-luddites are mostly bullies riding high on their vocal mob up voting anything they say. They started out blindsiding anybody having fun with AI in any forum and repeating these stupid arguments that wouldn’t pass as grade school logic if their pitchfork mob wasn’t yelling hurrah at any nonsense they spew.