Since we’re using El Salvador like it’s a new Gitmo. Like yes, it would still suck for the people from El Salvador.

But at least people from other countries would go back to their home country. Presumably to be treated far better than El Salvador.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because then most of the people being deported right now would just be deported to the US, causing a paradox and unfolding reality.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      We could easily, and should, implement a law saying that people must be deported back to their own country. It just means fewer people would be deported.

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        it’s not a law that one country can make. it’s a law that requires agreement between countries via international treaty

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Still not getting it.

          The US can create a law saying “you can only deport people to their home country”. And if the home country doesn’t allow that, don’t fucking deport them.

          It’s basic empathy.

          Otherwise, let’s just all deport them all to Antarctica. It would save a lot of money on logistics, if we’re willing to not give a fuck.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do you remember how prisoners were kept in Guantanamo Bay, even after they were no longer suspected of any wrongdoing, simply because there wasn’t a country that would both accept them and treat them in accordance with US law? Many of those prisoners ended up nowhere near where they came from.

    Some countries refuse to accept deportees. Some countries are so likely to mistreat deportees that sending them to those countries is illegal. Some countries simply don’t exist anymore.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because our laws only protect the wealthy, enforce racism, sexism and are getting worse and more genocidal in real time

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I bet the general answer from congress would be “Why? It’s not our country’s problem where they end up once out of here”

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because both Houses of Congress are controlled by Republicans who are 100% in support of everything the regime is doing.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, ignoring the law is this administration’s whole thing, so it wouldn’t matter. Also, as we’ve seen in the UK as well as the US, many targetted individuals have never even been to “their own country”.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    To the current constitution-violating republican administration, none of this matters and the cruelty is part of it. That said, let’s play a game:

    • what is the country of someone who grew up in the US, possibly speaking only English?
    • what happens if the country is inaccessible for some reason (countries occasionally collapse or close borders)
    • what happens if the borders of the country change and the person’s hometown is now in country X instead of their country of birth Y

    There are probably more weird edge cases that would need to be in any law as well.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup. Just waiting for a little while from now when Trump starts deporting Ukranians to Russia because “well the place they came from doesn’t exist it’s Russian now”

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also, if someone claims asylum, international law explicitly forbids sending them back to their country (not that international law has any bearing whatsoever on this but y’know, add a layer on top)

  • Tracaine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because the cruelty of it is the entire point. People still like to imagine those in power have some sort of misguided moral compass or reasoning. They do not. They are pure, unadulterated evil.