If we were realistic about going to Mars, we’d start with serious plans to build an oceanic base on Earth first. Traveling to Mars is a small hurdle, in comparison to actually living there. We’d learn a lot if we built a self-sustaining base in the deep ocean.

(elon, vance, trump, hegseth, bessent, rfk jr, bondi, mcmahon, gabbard, loeffler, etc)

Well, yes, but also that’s very illegal.

Will the GOP hold them accountable and start an investigation about it? Fuck no!

> WEAR GOGGLES

But, most of them are just food, because we would never have this uptick in smuggling otherwise.

And we’re signaling border officials to throw away all of that food, as if we didn’t waste enough food in this county.

I’m halfway joking, but marketing does involve various degrees of lying.

Dying is the point. This man wants you to die.

Ad-tech

world free of fraud

Am I missing something here? Marketing IS fraud.

FAGGOTRY
FAGGOTY
FAGGY

So close, yet so far.

Is “jew” still on the list? That one didn’t make a damn bit of sense.

Unless it’s with two women, because that’s totally hot.

What is far more likely is that policies simply wont cover accidents due to autonomous systems.

If the risk is that insurance companies won’t pay for accidents and put people on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills, then people won’t use autonomous systems.

This cannot go both ways. Either car makers are legally responsible for their AI systems, or insurance companies are legally responsible to pay for those damages. Somebody has to foot the bill, and if it’s the general public, they will avoid the risk.

The only enemy is the rich. This is how it’s existed for thousands of years. Rich emperors, rich kings, rich industrialists, rich media mongols, rich oligarchs, rich billionaires, rich corporations.

At this point, everything involving Trump and Musk are Not the Onion material.

That doesn’t explain why poor people are conservatives.

Because poor conservatives are trained to enjoy being fucked over. They believe in the “faith” of their party, as long as they get to “stick it to the libs”.

The poor conservatives do not benefit from any of this, even when they do oppress. We’re seeing this firsthand right now.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

Let’s say what it really is: The in-groups are the rich, who can afford the lawyers, corruption, bribery to make the law protect them, and use those same tools to keep it from binding them. The out-groups are everybody else, who cannot afford those same tools.

Once we simplify the equation on both sides, we get:

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: To protect the rich and fuck over the poor."

That’s it. That’s all that matters.

“Didn’t watch the video” seems to be a popular sentiment, considering the content of some of these replies.

Too many people trying to answer the question of the title, instead of actually watching the video and seeing what he has to say about it.