it’s his platform, he can do whatever he wants on it, he paid a lot of money for it. […] I really don’t get why this would upset anyone
lol
Champions “free speech” to justify buying Twitter in a legitimate way.
Wins over idealists who think they’re fighting for openness, calling it a “public square”, “Greek Agora” etc.
Bans critics and content he just doesn’t align with.
Gets called out.
“Whoa whoa, I meant my free speech. The rest of you? Peasants.”
People leave the platform: “I don’t get why this upsets anyone, it’s his platform”.
This reminds me of the behavior most common in subreddits such as /r/Bitcoin, we can even put it side by side:
Step 1: Preach a grand ideal — “X is the free speech Agora!” / “Bitcoin is your path to financial freedom!”
Step 2: Rally support by moralizing it — “If you’re against this, you’re against liberty!” / “Only fools ignore Bitcoin!”
Step 3: When the consequences hit — censorship or market crashes — suddenly the ideal becomes personal:
“It’s his platform, he can do whatever he wants.” / “You fool! You shouldn’t have invested more than you can afford to lose.”
lol
This reminds me of the behavior most common in subreddits such as /r/Bitcoin, we can even put it side by side: