My guess is he’s trying to rename Testosterone Deficiency Syndrome because he has it.

You’re acting like you found some defensible loophole but your cageyness means you know it won’t work if the facts were laid out before jury selection.

The question isn’t about “the” law it means “any” law. The judge is asking you if you’re going to enforce the law for which they are under trial, not if you’re here to enforce the constitution. If that is what you wanted to do you would vote guilty and let them appeal to the Supreme Court because they are the constitution people, not you.

Say No, but provide that elaboration, and see what happens. You’re still lying, dude.

They really should have just had the fourth panel.