

0·
5 months agoNice reply, btw. I thought it looked impressive at first, especially with the lack of motion blur but noticed the short depth of field which got me thinking a bit, but it stilled looked impressive. Your link is less sharp/more grainy so maybe the OP’s image could be digitally enhanced? which would explain some of the quality.
Good work and thanks for the update and info :) a good reminder that there’s people out there looking after our communities whilst we doomscroll away! ;)