Oddly, without the neural component it would be worthless for nearly all drug testing. And since they don’t really understand how things like the gut are almost like a second brain, the lack of a neural component will really hamper most things.
No doubt. And plenty of other things. Since the government doesn’t actually have the best interests of it’s people in mind. Bring on the AI overlords, since AI doesn’t have emotional reasons to hurt us for it’s own gain, maybe it will be better. Lol
Somewhere along the line I read a scifi book where “truth in advertising” laws were used to convict advertisers so they could be put in jail and used as involuntary organ donors. And I am sad to say I wouldn’t feel very sorry if that were a real thing. My hate for manipulative ads is so strong it overrides my hate for killing.
I think anything that can’t exist without money from advertising either shouldn’t exist, or should be subsidized by taxes, not ads.
If private industries can’t afford to do it right, they shouldn’t do it. You need only look at the quality of software to see why. Once the bar is set low, they will never raise it.
I just want to ask for more details on the “they’re litterally right” part. Mostly cause I didn’t think the had an official organized statement to be right about. But I don’t really follow them, so maybe I’m missing something.
Sounds reality tv…