America needed well placed, strategic policies to support domestic manufacturing decades ago. Now numbskulls started seeing that those jobs should be in the states. Republicans capitalized on that to get elected to attempt it in the worst possible and most destructive possible way.
Get out and ask some people. Plenty of women like it as long as you’re polite
Seniors who show they deserve respect should be given it. But plenty do not.
You’re being incredibly over dramatic. Plenty of businesses thrive off of mostly middle or lower income customers.
Cities are just better. Rich or no rich, larger amounts of people means more restaurants and things to do.
Genuinely, is that an issue if it is one?
Because smart people know that democracy is better for them.
Got elected with a promise of being a dictator on the side. Not on the promise of being it. He got elected on the promise of abusing immigrants.
He’s the president of the most powerful country on earth. When his words are “I’m seeking a dictatorship” they are news.
If we allow animal experimentation it’s only fair to also allow human experimentation
This isn’t a boring dystopia thing. It’s many things, but it’s certainly not boring ):
You know, you could just make a different phrase for troops.
Any example of an apolitical thing you can give, I can explain why it’s political
I disagree with the idea that just because something can be debated in politics, that it is by necessity political.
Basically, I think an object at rest remains at rest until it’s actively debated in politics
I think you missed the part on the chain where I was in support of allowing politics.
I disagree with the basis of “everything is politics” because to me it feels like that reduces the seriousness of what are actually active political endeavors.
I don’t ever agree with stances that ban politics from spaces. Because everyone should keep it on mind until the issues are fixed enough that it is not urgent.
The reason I disagree is that I don’t generally see random memes about cats, or physics existing as political. I don’t think people can reasonably call those political.
Except, “everything is politics” means everything. It doesn’t just mean everyone… Basically, my disagreement with the statement is to say that gravity is not political
Please don’t slander me what the fuck
I am very pro trans rights.
“everything is political” is a phrase designed to reduce the actual meaning and implications of the word politics. That said, I agree with the point of your message
You’re not going to have a hard time finding a dem inciting violence.
So you think it’s right to blame people who did what they could? Just because others voted against them? Prick.
Is ancap not synonymous with libertarian? Either way, you all lack understanding of what the government needs to do for an area to function
This part specifically is the what I was referring to. Basically, I feel as though you’re overemphasizing the “rich” aspect of why people live in cities. Tons of people just like being around other people.
The faster money flows, the more expensive jobs can be provided, and in the country side money moves slower. Wages being higher in cities isn’t because that’s where the rich are; it’s because there’s more places to spend money, so everything changes hands quicker and “creates” more money.(While I do think that plenty of modern econ is bunk bullshit, that’s one concept that rings true).
While I do agree that the rich kills small towns, I think it’s primarily a different reason—big box stores like walmart and medium boxes like dollar general using abusive price practices like undercutting using their wealth to push out the smaller competition, and make it nigh impossible for new places to get going.
Wealth inequality is quite meaningful, but I think it’s far from everything. There’s a lot of smaller reasons why cities tend to be better places to live, that don’t have to do with the rich.
One good example is that higher density means more gov $ per sqrmile, even if the people are poorer, and more infrastructure can be shared, making it cheaper to build. That results in cities inevitably having better infrastructure than the countryside