Kinda makes sense why he lied and deleted my comment for “genocide denial” previously. Makes it easier to ban someone down the line and have it seem justified. Apparently, I’m simultaneously denying a genocide and engaging in apologia.
Don’t forget everyone:
- Criticising a mod == genocide apologia.
- Disputing a regular poster to a mods comm about Hasan using his own clip == genocide denial.
Preemptively for all the idiots who played right into this guys hands last time, didn’t deny the genocide in Palestine and still don’t.
Yeah how convenient. You aren’t known for your top tier takes. You tried this social credit reasoning on the last post. My account was an alt for my lemm.ee account. That instance shut down and I moved to this one.
I’m not known for genocide denial, so at least I’m still a better person than you’ll ever be.
Honestly has been wild to me that a mod lies about genocide denial and that no matter how many times I state otherwise that same group of people (one with a month old account and 832 comments, you with a days old account) will come in and parrot it. Definitely nothing suspicious or wrong with that.
His former account is @_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Ah with mod logs showing being banned for harassment and calls for suicide. That tracks.
The mod who made those actions has been a frequent PTB, and has tried to start a “war” on some instances.
So that is not the “proof” you think it is, FYI.
All of them? The 196 bans and .ml bans? There are multiples instances of each of these types of bans spanning back nearly a year. Seems to be a pretty compelling pattern of behaviour to me.
I was referring to the most recent, specifically.